Sentences with phrase «did beat that game»

Now admittedly, I did beat the game fairly quickly (about 20 hours to get 100 %), but while some people claim that's proof the game is too easy or short... I honestly disagree.

Not only did she beat the game... but she did it before ME.

When I finally did beat the game, my brother was at Scout Camp so I plugged in my VCR and recorded the ending for him.

No longer do you beat the game with a character that was supposed to be dead after the first level.

In any case, you usually wan na tell everyone that you finally did beat that game.

Not exact matches

How do you beat the big dogs at their own game with a smaller brand, in a smaller market and / or with a smaller budget?

The situation gets more galling when Netflix executives state, without offering proof, that they are beating the networks, as Sarandos did last December when he said that Netflix's drug - trafficking drama Narcos reached more viewers than the HBO hit Game of Thrones.

Still, the angst gets cranked up every time computers do something impressive, like when Google's AlphaGo recently beat South Korean champion Lee Sedol at the ancient game of Go.

Just as my wife doesn't have to play like Steffi Graf to beat me at tennis, you don't have to invest like a pro to win the stock market game.

But to be overcome by evil does not mean that he who is overcome is weaker, inferior, beaten, eliminated; no, it means that he is led to play evil's game — to respond by using evil's means, to do evil.

Sure, it doesn't exactly win the SEO game, but you know what beats SEO?

I love that game, but I don't know movies very well so I am easily beaten at it.

we have got this boys Leicester has alot of big teams to face now coming to the end of the season and so do spuds go have a look at there fixtures the only teams that worry me in our remaining games are west ham and man city and i reckon we will beat both of them wenger wont let west ham do the double over us and man city are not the team they once was and cazorla wilshere are nearly back with us having a game in handdddd!!!!!!

But is it worth the risk playing a not so fully fit defender in an irrelevant game (sure, wat does beating dortmund tend to prove?

Arsenal did well, but we cant beat them this way, we must play with them like themselfs, dirty, But dosent matter, lets focuse our next game Even city did nt beat chelsea

Now coming to his recent games, he was easily beaten for that Burnley goal, he should have done better.

He had a jibe at Wenger after the game at the Emirates last season because we didn't beat a Chelsea team that parked the bus.

WENGER's biggest flaw is that he sticks to his plan again and again does not play his players enough that is why most teams, at least those with Coaches that can read the game beat us or put a fierce resistance, most know ARSENAL game plan and prepare for it.

Now we have another London derby coming up on Monday which certainly won't be as easy as the Hammers game, considering that Palace did the unthinkable last week and beat Chelsea at the Bridge.

Consistency is ultimately the key word for Arsenal moving forward, as if they could get at teams like they did with Spurs on a regular basis and really put the pressure on them while going out to win games and showing their quality, they can beat any team on their day.

(Jose) Mourinho goes to places, sets up and makes sure they don't get beat, Wenger does not play that game.

I just don't want to comment on the fact how much better our squad is than the one Spuds have, yet we manage not to beat them in 2 games.

OT I Remember the last time when we were Hoping for West Ham to do us a favour against Liverpool, that was back in the George Graham days and it was the second from last game of the season, yup, Liverpool ended up winning 5 - 0... And we were left with the mission of having to beat the Scouser's by two clear goals to win the league, at Anfield.

Beating the champions twice is meaningless if you end up 10 points behind them at the end of the season like we did last season to Leicester, I would rather we win the matches that really count like last nights game against Watford, Liverpool did us a favour and we did not prepare properly for the game

Arsenal tell a different story they win more games than Liverpool and than they put the icing on the cake by wining the FA cup and beating Chelsea truly well sending all the doubters with their banners to the silence corner Well done Arsenal

Even FA cup is in danger now, Chelsea are still in it and now they don't intend to lose a game any time soon, remember they always punish us during crucial matches, we can beat them when we need to win the plate or shield, or whatever

If I were to go out and get beat and then realize after the game that I got beat because of something I did the day before... to me, that'd be the worst way to lose.

Was beaten once on the night but this games did more good than bad for us out here.

Austin scored 18 goals at better than a goal every two games in his first season as a Premier League player and the fact that he did it for a club that was getting beaten all the time and was relegated should be even more impressive.

Even during the times of Denis B, Thiery H and Viera those referees were always against us otherwise how would one explain us with all that quality loosing to manure certain games??? The fa is part of that plan... the referees they keep giving those big games... why did we have to play manure on our 50th unbeaten game (not to mention the controvercial penalty awarded), why did we have to play wenger's 1000th game against a moreens chelsea we've never beaten?

It was actually a gift to a player of Alexis quality in that kind of position and the forward did not waste time to beat the goalkeeper and convert into the empty net to set the tone for Arsenal in the game.

If we can beat them again next game it will do wonders against the Old Trafford curse... This Liverpool game has the potential to do the same.

Last season we were not in it but we did beat Man City in the final pre-season game, only to play like puddings and ship four goals in a home loss to Liverpool on the opening day.

We can beat any1 of those teams on our day, we have trouble like teams against dortmund who press us high up the pitch, those 3 you just mentioned don't play a pressing game and i truly believe we are capable of beating them.

It's 3 points at stake and we don't get more points by beating Man u. I suggest we take it one game at a time and grab the 3 points at Huddersfield first because this can really be a banana skin.

The year before that we did win our opener against Crystal Palace after beating Man City to the Shield quite comfortably but then our title challenge faltered and Arsenal did not win another league game for over a month and by mid-October Chelsea were runaway leaders.

After Loyola beat Drake, 72 - 57, on Feb. 7, she wrote to Ingram: «Donte, keep getting those rebounds; that action helps to add more points to the game; keep making those threes as you did last night even though those Bulldogs were always on your back.»

Arsenal could beat Chelsea, as long as the players still have the motivation (we didn't see this in the last game).

Last season Chelsea didn't win every game 4 - 0 infact they beat bottom sides by single goals BUT even beating a bottom side by 1 goal is good because they got the job done.

Walcott did 21 goals and 14 assists in 31 games which even beats Marco Reus's tally (not saying he is better but similar).

They could not beat Luxembourg in their last game, nor did they manage to win the Euro's in their own country and lost to a technically inferior team in the finals.

United do look to be finding form at the right time, having beaten Chelsea and Crystal Palace in impressive fashion in their last two league games.

How true that is I» don't really no.But I do fancy us to beat the mancs tonight and the winner of our game will probably go on to lift the trophy in May

tough game against boro????!!! So how will it be if we meet man u next????!!!! or real madrid in ucl????!!!! so disappointing n do nt say they beat man city..

They are a complete Team and that is why it is so tough to beat them in a 44 - minute Game... Case in point, they trailed for much of their Week 1 Game with Team Harris but during the Game's closing moments they locked in and made big buckets as they so often do..

So how did they beat Virginia, a team that entered 31 - 2 overall and had won 20 - of - 21 games in the ACC?

There are numerous strong Teams in this League and if you don't bring your best (either literally to the Game or while playing in the Game) you will get beat.

I believe tgere are 3 titke contenders this year Leicester, city and arsenal About Leicester they are doing great but there football depends on counter attacking and few quick passes to reach the ball to mahrez or vardy i don't think they can impress anybody if they faced teams that park the bus like what the teams do with arsenal and also any injury for mahrez or vardy will ruin there season so i don't consider them a real challenge and in an open game we got the best out of them and beat them with 5 goals to 2 so calm down gooners About city they had very impressing start for the season then they were vety baf winning most games by pure luck or last minute goals and they could be beaten easily Arsenal are the best team form we controled most of the games and the losses and draws were by bad referee decisions or bad luck and the 4 points margain with city could have been easily 10 or 12

«I don't think we can beat Cincinnati at their slow - down game, and I don't much think we can beat them at our fast one either,» said John Wooden, UCLA's coach, when he finally arrived.

This was one that they can look back on come Playoff time and know they can beat anybody and do so in close games..