Sentences with phrase «did choose number»

But, if you did choose number 3, and want to feed your family correctly, why would you want to do any different when it is your new puppy?

Not exact matches

Many folks will simply choose to go without insurance because they're no longer fined for doing so, and companies with large numbers of young employees are likely to drop all coverage, since the AHCA is far more generous with the 20 to 40 crowd than the ACA.

As the argument goes, Android and Apple may have 600,000 apps each to choose from, but do those numbers really mean anything when they respectively count dozens of useless fart apps?

Of course, not every player will do this, and it's possible some numbers are chosen more frequently than others.

«People need to be involved early on and well aware of what's happening,» Hayes notes, adding that the number one reason employees don't use a new system is that they weren't involved in choosing it.

Examine the reasons why so few women choose to enter or stay in venture capital roles and call on the venture capital industry to do more to recruit and promote women investors to partner level roles in order to increase the number of women investment professionals

We do not know if our sellers and Square Cash customers will choose to purchase all or any portion of these reserved shares, but any purchases they do make will reduce the number of shares available to the general public.

You can chose to redeem points at a number of travel partners, so you don't need to worry about being loyal to a single airline or hotel.

The actual number of shares doesn't matter, but you should choose a sufficient amount (say, 1,000,000 or more) that allows the flexibility to share equity rights among a broad set of stakeholders.

A large number of current retirees did not choose to retire.

Nor is it fully indicative of competitive position as (i) some players may be self - funding, (ii) others may choose not to disclose fundraising activity and (iii) it doesn't speak to the vast number of periphery players who may choose to meaningfully move into the crowdfunding market.

As a guide, a trader who is comfortable with risk might choose a number somewhere around five percent, whereas a trader who doesn't like risk would select a value somewhere around two percent.

«There are a number of funerals, and we don't want students and teachers to have to choose between going to a funeral and going to school,» Runcie said.

Much as I think the expansion has a good deal further to run, I suspect that a significant number of households have chosen a debt level which makes sense in good times, but does not take into account the fact that bad times inevitably will occur at some time or other.

Parental consent on many topics (NOT A LAW) 6: Thou shall not kill — NOT UNIQUE TO CHRISTIANITY (long pre-dated it) = > Goes back to the first offspring of humanity or the chosen depending on version 7: Thou shall not commit adultery — huge number of Christians commits adultery by LEGALLY remarrying = > still actionable in various tort and civil cases across America (didn't say it was a law) 8: Thou shall not steal — NOT UNIQUE TO CHRISTIANITY = > many laws on this we are very concerned about our stuff 9: Thou shall not bear false witness — NOT UNIQUE TO CHRISTIANITY = > purgery anyone 10: Thou shalt not covet — NOT A LAW = > stalking laws (Stalking IS a crime.

In fact, we already do that in a number of areas — Pell grants for poor college students, child care to the parent, not a religious institution, and the parent freely chooses a school that is secular, Buddhist, Baptist and so on.

I been saying this a number of times in the blogs now, that if someone other than Christian did this at a meeting... I will tune them out if I choose to... my point had been... why cant anyone else tune people out..

I have no doubt that John, our choir director at one of the congregations where my father served, sincerely believed that «Whispering Hope,» a number frequently chosen by him as the choir's offertory piece, was a profoundly Christian hymn; but it was really an expression of vacuous hope without any substantive theological grounding: «Wait till the darkness is over / wait till the tempest is done / Hope for the sunshine tomorrow, after the darkness is gone / Whispering hope, oh, how welcome thy voice / Making my heart in its sorrow rejoice.»

Most Christians might choose to distance themselves from Zimmerman's claim that the shooting was a part of God's plan, but a sizable number still do agree with his view.

@In Santa we trust — So if I give you a choice to choose the number 1 or the number 2 you don't have free will?

Any entity, in other words, which chooses some medium of the public forum to reach large numbers of the public with a message and is willing and able to pay to do so.

Since we don't know what happens after death, any number of things could happen, but my main point is that the idea that god gave us free will to choose is an illusion.

Sometimes I wonder if perhaps the rooms of Alcoholics Anonymous have, at some point in its 76 year history, contained individuals who possessed the ability to do great things — cure cancer, revolutionize politics, or contribute other great things to society — but whose minds became so polluted with AA propaganda that they shut off their own brilliance and chose to spend the rest of their lives «making their sobriety their number one priority» and believing humility to be more valuable than fulfilling their potential and allowing their greatness to shine.

Everything we do has more value if we do it deliberately, if we consciously choose to do it rather than any number of other things.

This doesn't include the number of wives who choose not to go to church because their husbands will have no part.

A growing number of classical theists believe that although God could coerce in the weaker sense, God has chosen not to do so because a world in which there exists significant freedom and the potential for evil is superior to a world containing neither.

It is unfortunate that CNN chose to address the New Year with predictions from a religious perspective, thus attracting any number of religious bigots to attack anyone who believes differently than they do.

If one makes this assumption, then one might (as Muehl appears to do) draw a further conclusion: that societal acceptance would bring in its wake a significant increase in the numbers of those choosing homosexuality.

What will this do to the number of followers of Christ who will choose to give not just their money but their lives to the needs of the world?

All you have to do is leave a comment from now until Friday June 5th and I will be choosing the random lucky number over the weekend.

BUT here's what you need to do: choose a recipe book from your shelf at random (either close your eyes, use a random number generator, ask your nearest and dearest to pick a number, it's up to you) and then turn to the index at the back.

You can leave but you won't be the same player you are here, history repeats itself Sanchez and us fans are used to it by now, so choose wisely buddy do you want to be a player that's loved by the fans or just another number the decision is yours.

Why i want this Mbappe deal is, the reasons are this following 1) Sale of shirt, now that Lacazette has taken number 9, i don't know the number he would like to choose, however the turn out on shirt sale would be doubled in Mbappe's time, trust me 2) This will make us immediately title favourites, with Sanchez, Ozil, Mbappe, Lacazette, our attacking 4 would be very massive.

Traffic on the Ohio Turnpike is a coffle of tractor - trailers as Golden Flashes coach Gary Waters argues that the RPI, that mystical set of numbers the NCAA tournament committee consults when it hands out at - large bids, should R.I.P. Every mid-major coach is sympathetic to Waters's argument, because big - time schools insist on playing nonconference games in their own arenas, with officials of their choosing, and the RPI doesn't penalize them for refusing to go on the road.

It's obvious for me that arsenal need 4 players to become a world class team like bayern and real madrid i couldn't dare mention barcelona because they have unbelievable front three and they maybe the best attack in history of football we are lacking quality in the ST as well as the RW of course giroud and campvell are very good players but in my opinion they are less in quality than the rest of the team so we need to improve the quality in these positins About the DM it's a number issue and i think the position is covered with flamini doing good job and elneny coming which can be deployed there About the fourth signing we need is a center back I don't think i saw till now enough minutes for gabriel to tell if he can make the position his own or not But what makes me doubt him that wenger didn't choose him till now over per which means he is not miles ahead of him so i think we need a new better CB This team can go and fight for every thing even the champions leafue....

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I hope that Wenger does not feel the need to push either Ozil or Cazorla in a wide position in order to accommodate both, but chooses his eleven on form, which means that Ozil will have to prove himself to regain his place in the number 10 position.

«But the fact Salah is playing so consistently well and creating and scoring goals in the numbers he is doing means there's now very little to choose between them.»

«I am obviously delighted that he chose us ahead of a number of other clubs and I think he will do really, really well for the team.

There's the possible snowball effect of Dybala choosing the number he did.

It's interesting that whoever admins the page has chosen Facebook as their medium, since Facebook is notoriously (and needlessly, in my opinion) difficult about breastfeeding photos, but it doesn't look they've had any trouble displaying images of actual breastfeeding mothers, although the page has been reported as offensive a number of times.

While children do this fall tree roll and cover activity, they will learn letters and numbers — depending on which option you choose to use.

I do think the number of families choosing to use cloth is rising in popularity though, as I'm constantly seeing cute cloth diapers on babies.

I understand this may not be true for everyone, those that choose not to work (see below), those who can not find work or those who are not happy at work, but I venture to say that a number of women do feel that working is an important part of who they are.

The number of times that I heard I was spoiling my son or was asked when would we wean, what daycare were we choosing, did he sleep through the night yet and so on was immense.

I don't think they realize that hospitals and doctors aren't threatened by the small number of people who choose homebirths.

Don't go overboard, but you can choose a smaller weekly award for a certain number of successful days and a bigger, more exciting reward for a monthly amount.

But that's what a small and growing number of women are choosing to do.

If your local authority does approach your family and ask for information, and you wish to provide that information, you might might choose any number of ways to do so.

Point is, if you choose to do EC, you will * absolutely * reduce the number of diapers you use, and thus positively impact your baby's well - being and the saving of our sacred environment.