Sentences with phrase «did early humans»

On the other hand, today's paleo eaters tend to include more meat than did early humans, ignoring the impressive evidence linking meat consumption to risk of chronic disease.

At what point did early humans develop a soul.

just like children learn to make pictures before they learn how to correctly make written language so did early humans.

Hugh Hewitt's interview gives you a good overview, as does the earlier Human Events essay linked, and over at Ricochet, D.C. McAllister has begun a series of posts that will examine the proposals one - by - one.

Not exact matches

«I don't want to say this is a great day — because it will have a negative impact on human beings, and I want to be compassionate,» says Linkner, the founder of Detroit Venture Partners, a $ 50 million venture capital firm that invests in early - stage start - ups in the city.

For example, when political newcomer David Brat successfully challenged House Republican majority leader Eric Cantor to represent Virginia in the U.S. Congress, it came as a surprise only to those reporters who didn't bother to go to Virginia and talk to «actual humans,» as Rutenberg observes (echoing an earlier analysis by Washington Post media reporter Paul Farhi).

Young people don't appear to be as saddled by this issue, though — a 2011 study found that humans are best at learning new names in our early 20s.

In an earlier computing era — not really so long ago — a beautiful hardware device with smartly tailored software to run it was a market - shaking innovation, and no one did that better than Apple: Its combined expertise in hardware design and human interface design were unmatched.

If you weren't an early adopter of Twitter, or don't spend a ton of time checking your timeline (or if you're just a normal human being with better things to do) you can get a little behind in Twitter abbreviations and acronyms.

Scarlett Johansson's casting as a Japanese human - cyborg in «Ghost in the Shell» caused an uproar earlier this year, as did Tilda Swinton's role as the Ancient One in «Doctor Strange» — a character depicted as an Asian male in the comic source material.

With the recent discovery of anatomically modern humans evolving 100,000 years earlier than previously estimated, it's not out of the question that our ancestors did a lot of moving about.

For instance, the researchers didn't look at other contaminants, like the effects of endocrine disruptors, flame retardants and pesticides on human health and early deaths.

I believe that throughout most of our early human history, when our species population was still relatively small, you simply didn't see rampant homosexuality.

Early cosmologies also pictured the cosmos relative to the human observer, as we continue to do when we speak of sending a rocket «upward» into space or refer to Australians as living «down under.»

I agree very much with the idea Sam brings forth that in our early history as the human race we did not know of mental illness and explained it by possession.

But if human beings are a product of the evolutionary process, why do we suppose that the earlier participants in this process were wholly unlike us?

What the early Christian believers and writers, for example Mark, tried to do was apply to him the highest conceivable categories, human and divine; but in the end these all proved inadequate, as the later church soon discovered; for Jesus means more, was more, and is more than any of these categories could convey.

I also do not want to sound like an expert in human behavior but could you ask your partners aunt who or what influenced her the most at an early age?

So despite the fact that I believe human life is inherently valuable even in its earliest form, I only feel a little guilty voting for pro-choice candidates because I'm often convinced they will do more to address the root causes of abortion — poverty, health care, education, etc..

If any human life has a universal objective right to exist, then it only follows that a life in the earliest stages of development does also.

I have urged in an earlier chapter that to be human is to be both body and soul in a complex relationship in which the soul (or do we mean mind here?)

Any idea of going back to the pattern or world - view of traditional societies either primal or medieval or even early modern is doing violence to the historical nature and social becoming of human beings.

The truth is that St Paul has the most to do with the diversity of the early Christian Church (Followers of the Way), but today religion is used politically and otherwise to divide humans into «us» as against «them».

If the evidence required us to assume that the earliest beings we call human did in fact embody this structure of existence, then we would have to posit exceedingly high levels of mentality in our prehuman ancestors, assuming that for hundreds of thousands of years they must have far more closely approximated our contemporary existence than does any now existing nonhuman member of the simian family.

Did you know the Middle East is where mathematical calculations, algebra, geometry, etc. started??? Did you know it was an ancient Iranian who discovered alcohol??? Did you know that the earliest known Bill of Human Rights was written by King Cyrus, ruler of the Persian Empire?

It would be to do for the modern era what Aristotle succeeded in doing for an earlier age — it would be to find a way, given the modern world's understanding of nature, to do justice to human being as a part of nature so understood.

Dependent upon these «spiritual forces», the early humans knew they were not free to do whatever they liked on the earth.

Does religion (equated by Justice Kennedy in an earlier case with the belief that «an ethic and a morality which transcends human invention» exists) have any role to play in the law?

So a chimp didn't evolve into a human, rather an earlier form diverged to form both species.

But, as I said earlier, just because we're born in a sinful state, doesn't mean sin is part of what it is to be human.

This has always happened throughout church history, when new statements are brought forth to complete earlier insights in order to do justice to the inexhaustible riches of divine revelation even in the earthen vessel of human language.»

I don't think beliefs are completely fabricated by humans (thus my admission earlier), but I completely understand why you do.

As I said earlier, everything that is done by an institution is done through human agency.

While all Catholic moral theologians seem opposed to the direct killing of human persons, some maintain that the embryo in the early stages is not yet a full human person, and therefore does not have the same rights as, for instance, the mother.

If you believe in a deity (not diety, which has something to do with eating), he / she should have no problem existing beyond the constraints of time, and «Having 10 billion years to plan the reveal between the Big Bang and the earliest humans» would mean the same as an instant.

If King's conception of the Deity or deities that inhabit our solar system is that possessed by a primitive tribe of hunter - gatherers or by one of the earliest of civilizations, one of half - human gods (chimeras) or monsters, little concerned with the fate of humanity, both capricious and threatening («As flies to wanton boys are we to the gods; they kill us for their sport»), that is interesting from an anthropological perspective, but what does it have to do with «first things»?

(How was it ever conceivable, we ask, that a man like Christian Wolff, in whose dry - as - dust head all the learning of the early eighteenth century was concentrated, should have preserved such a baby - like faith in the personal and human character of Nature as to expound her operations as he did in his work on the uses of natural things?

These were wholly new forces in human experience, and they were drawing men to themselves, just as the Virgin had done centuries earlier.

Earlier studies involving animal models did not translate to humans.

Did you understand from the beginning you were likely to offend folks with your unhealthy yet indulgent food served by extra-attractive human specimens, and decide early not to worry about it because your core audience would get it?

«Recent research on humans published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition earlier this year indicates that drinking diet beverages does not cause people to overeat or to increase their intake of sweet foods and beverages.

Blake's 9.69 time is faster than what he ran in London earlier this month (9.75; Bolt won gold with a 9.63), and ties him with American Tyson Gay for the title of the second - fastest human ever — only Bolt has ever run faster than their 9.69 (and he's done it twice).

In my opinion, taking either of those guys with to Puerto Rico would be done as a human interest story, akin to when the Marlins gave Adam Greenberg an at - bat in 2012 after his career was derailed when he was beaned in the head in his first career plate appearance years earlier.

In 2013, a study was published in Early Human Development that questioned the effectiveness of tummy time, since no difference was seen in the babies who had regular tummy time and the babies who didn't.

Previous studies of the effect of breastfeeding on morbidity among full - term infants have not always accounted for selection bias that may result if infants who are breastfed are inherently healthier than bottle - fed infants.22 In the current study, the VLBW infants» ability to breastfeed did not reflect better health status as both human milk and infant formula were provided via gavage feeding especially during early enteral feedings.

But early weaning is not what human supposed to do and health cost need to be paid.

And early human societies probably did breastfeed their children beyond a year.

It's really only by scientists performing some of this essential work on early human embryos that we are going to be able to understand why some embryos make it and some don't.

A pregnant / not pregnant (qualitative) urine human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) test such as Clearblue ® can be done as early as 10 days after a missed menstrual period.

In 2007, researchers reported in the journal Early Human Development that children who had received no DHA in formula or breast milk during the first 17 weeks of life had poorer visual acuity at age 4, and did worse on language tests showing verbal IQ, than those who fed breast milk.