Did you follow the measurements in the recipe exactly?
I found it really tarty too and
I did follow the measurements.
Not exact matches
Just as Russell asked how could relations among phenomena not reflect relations among noumena, we can ask the
following question: if a key feature of mass is continuity, then
does this not imply some underlying substrate that must persist without change from
measurement to
measurement?
I don't understand why — if people were having issues with
measurements — you wouldn't go back and edit the post instead of allowing people like me to
follow an incorrect recipe, wasting time and valuable ingredients.
Hazelnut flour / meal
does not absorb much liquid and so the
measurements become all the more important to
follow.
interestingly, my packaging for wheat bran, oat bran, and wheat flour are VERY different than the weight
measurements you gave so i'm very glad i
followed your gram
measurements bc i don't know what my results would have been if i hadn't.
I'm slowly converting all my recipes to cup
measurements as I know a lot of people don't use kitchen scales and I want to try and make my recipes easy for all to
follow
But don't stress about
following our
measurements exactly.
Whenever I try out a new marinade, I don't exactly
follow a recipe or remember the
measurements.
AWESOME i usually don't post my comments, but i made this twice - once was bad and the second i am eating now and is amazing - so wanted to share my journey:) the first loaf i made was way too dry - i
followed the recipe by cup
measurements, but the result was a dough more than a batter, and the loaf was dense and hard.
I
do agree that more oil was needed in between the first and second batch but mine were cooked all the way through, and I
followed the
measurements of about 3 Tbsp.
I think they will be amazing & perfect then ** I
did use exact
measurements and
follow the recipe to perfection, so I didn't add extra almond or anything like that, just to clarify.
That's why those people are NEVER HAPPY and usually not successful at anything they attempt... they are failures waiting to happen... they don't
follow instructions... or exact
measurements....
If you don't know what Blue Apron is, it is basically just a subscription service where you can order meals for the week and all of the ingredients come pre-packaged to the correct
measurements and an easy to
follow recipe card that includes pictures.
I'm from Norway and
do follow Low carb eating on facebook: — RRB - There i see lots of recipes wich looks delicious, but I
do have trouble to understand your unit of
measurement.
The
measurements I've read online are 8 cups flour, 1 cup oil, but I really didn't have so much flour at home so I just
followed the ratio and made a small batch.
All you have to
do is
follow the directions to submit your
measurements to the designers.
I would then add to that by saying dietary cholesterol
does indeed have a significant impact on blood cholesterol in the hours
following a meal and only returns to baseline after an overnight fast (which is when they took their
measurements).
Hazelnut flour / meal
does not absorb much liquid and so the
measurements become all the more important to
follow.
The
measurements and ingredients will adjust themselves, and all you have to
do is
follow the method.
If you
follow the recommended practices (see «How
do I get a reproducible resting metabolism
measurement?»)
All I
do is that I
followed their suggestion,
do the
measurements and ordered my dress based on the size chart.
Now that sounds like my kind of shop - if I ran one I'd have
measurements on each label too, I
follow quite a few vintage shops on Instagram and it drives me mad that they don't bother mentioning size with anything, even with shoes?!
It's not the kind of dress that has give in it but due to the boning and construction it is the kind of dress that can
do some slight cinching work, so
follow the size chart with your most recent
measurements and you should be able to ensure a snug, comfortable fit that looks fabulous and glamorous this holiday season.
Overall I would say that the dress sizes true and that it's best to
follow the size chart as I would have still got a lovely fit if I have sized up for my hips, as I should have
done had I taken my recent
measurements.
And another difficulty is that the vast majority of national
measurements do not
follow students on time; in other words, national assessment measures a cohort of students — students in a specific grade or grades.
To address this concern, we use observations of student achievement from teachers» classes in the one or two school years prior to and
following TES
measurement, but we
do not use student achievement gains from the year in which the observations were conducted.
Nevada has imposed steep penalties on Harcourt Educational
Measurement for errors in administering statewide exams, and Georgia is poised to
do the same,
following scoring glitches typical of the kind that have plagued state - sponsored testing programs in recent years.
Mine won't change any actual
measurement [I
did make provision for correcting systemic errors, but
following a comment by Nick Stokes I now feel that it is best not to make any changes at all.].
If we
follow the mountains, then we have taken
measurements at altitude, don't we need to also measure at various levels of altitude where there is no mountain?
Doug Proctor says: February 3, 2011 at 2:32 pm «The circular logic of Phil Jones — to drop the mis - matching tree ring data for the recent past on the basis that the previous trends (before temperature data) of proxy data were valid, while the recent proxy data was invalid because it didn't
follow the temperature
measurement trends is still not understood.»
To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006)
follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport
measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you
follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW
measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).
2) Given what
measurements are available,
does any temperature change
follow CO2 or precede CO2 change?
Well since Temperature
measurements are good out to 1200 km away from the thermometer; you don't really need any more than one thermometer for Nepal; and since you only need one; it
follows by logical deduction, that it doesn't matter a hoot where you put the thermometer; well there are some places in Kathmandu where you could insert a thermometer and get anomalous readings; which aren't quite the same as anomalies which are supposed to be anomalous.
Following Professor Pielke's analogy (on his pages, I think) of heating a pan of water, he seems to be saying that you don't need multiple
measurements to understand a trend as long as you have enough spacial resolution, and that somehow «heat» is more important than «temperature».
Normal, non-ideology-based scientists question the veracity of the CRU — IPCC flavoured results just because the JBM camaraderie - based group
did refuse to honour such requests and people ask the
following question: why, if both the empirical results — the raw data (including the nitty - gritty details of the temperature
measurements) AND the theoretical model - based machinery are above board and the overall climatological picture of a man (n)- made warming is pretty much a safe bet, why then would some AGW researchers like the JBM gang refuse to accept that they, too, have got to conform to normal scientific procedure and release the raw data and the details of the theoretical machinery used to understand those data?
Implementation of the strategic plan requires the same priority as client work, continuing reminders of the firm's culture and expectation,
follow - up, reinforcement, publicity - internal and external - for efforts and especially results,
measurement of results and an assessment of goal achievement at various stages, i.e., are we getting it
done?
All racial groups had significant increases in days abstinent from alcohol and other drugs and in the percentage in recovery across the
measurement period, but
did not differ from one another at the six - month
follow - up.
Initially, these drawers were designed to be custom made wider, but the cabinet maker
did not properly
follow the design and the
measurements so during the installation of the kitchen we realized that we were ending up with a 20 cmm empty spot at the right side of the kitchen.