How
did nuclear deterrence become plausible?
What
does nuclear deterrence have in common with (1) pacifist idealism, (2) the modern notion that warfare must be total, and (3) romanticism's vision of history?
Not exact matches
«While this might make Putin look like a tough guy flexing new
nuclear muscles ahead of upcoming undemocratic elections in Russia that will coronate him again, the new systems don't change the essential
deterrence equation between the US and Russia,» Barry Pavel, a senior vice president and director of the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security at the Atlantic Council wrote.
One chief difference is - neither India nor Pakistan have threatened to use their
nuclear weapons... the
deterrence aspect doesn't have to be vocalized.
Nonetheless,
deterrence and Mutually Assured Destruction
did prevent
nuclear war between the USA and USSR, until the collapse of Communism.