Sentences with phrase «did on carbon trading»

He said he did not know the details of Dr Pearman's case, but if a scientist were to join a group that argued against government policy as the Australian Climate Group did on carbon trading he or she would contravene CSIRO's media policy.

Not exact matches

The issue figures to feature prominently in the next federal election, with Liberal Leader Stà © phane Dion arguing the benefits of a carbon tax, while NDP Leader Jack Layton makes the case that cap - and - trade would do a better job of putting the costs on big polluters rather than on low - income families.

If permits to emit carbon were traded freely, the US would buy up the permits that China did not need, and so on.

At any rate, in my personal view, we should not prescribe exactly what needs to be done but should instead implement flexible schemes like Kyoto or the McCain - Lieberman Climate Stewardship Act that allow trading of emissions credits, credits for carbon sequestration (provided it can truly be shown to work) and so on.

The ideal scenario for Europe would be for the United States quickly to establish a system to cap and trade carbon dioxide, and then pledge to put pressure on other rich countries to do the same thing.

He proposes spending tens of billions of dollars (a bargain, he insists, compared to the hundreds of billions that would be spent on a cap - and - trade style approach), but he doesn't say how he'd convince the United States or China to adopt the necessary carbon tax.

Do you not think it possible to educate the public and Congress on the advantages of a carbon tax in simplicity and removal of opportunity for political horse - trading?

Unfortunately, there don't seem to be legions of lobbyists out there for innovation (and energy efficiency, for that matter), while there are potent forces fighting on the side of coal companies and utilities, financial institutions eager to trade carbon credits, manufacturers and retailers of today's consumer products.

My point is this: In my view, the Times should find out, and convey to the public (in one place and in organized fashion), the views of each and every Congressperson, and person running for Congress, regarding a moratorium on coal - fired power plants (until their carbon dioxide emissions can be eliminated), a carbon «cap - and - auction» or «cap - and - trade» system, or carbon tax, and related matters having to do with global warming.

It is designed to ensure the price on carbon imposed through the EU emissions trading scheme does not fall below a set level.

Based on Scenario A we are already about 10 % over the predicted emissions if we did nothing in spite of the fact that $ billions have been spent on Kyoto initiatives and carbon trading, so in spite of our efforts to slow down the rate of emissions because China and other rapidly developing economies are politically excluded from Kyoto; this has served no purpose in reducing CO2 emissions.

Regardless of the mechanism chosen, any carbon pricing system implemented should be Revenue Neutral so that the government does not become dependent on the revenue from the fee, tax or trade credits.

Yohe: There are a number of reasons, one of which is that cap - and - trade, while it does put a price on carbon, puts a variable price on carbon depending on the supply and demand of permits.

It is reasonable to conclude that China's rising carbon footprint is in no small part attributable to the consumer demands of its trading partners and points to the challenge of apportioning blame responsibilities on a geographic basis, as the current international climate negotiations attempt to do.

However, research from World Resources Institute shows that putting a price on carbon — with either a carbon tax or a cap - and - trade program — does not inherently help or hurt lower - income households (it is neither progressive or regressive, in economist - speak).

Climate News Network: Don't put any bets on it — but at long last the world - wide trade in carbon looks set to improve, if only just a little.

While California cap - and - trade doesn't apply directly to us, it does apply to the joint powers authority called PWRPA that we helped establish to get our power, and we may have a chance to sell carbon allowances from environmental improvements that we make (at 1:53:00, end of staff presentation): In addition to what you can see on the video is the 3 hours that we spent in closed (confidential) session to discuss internally the negotiations with labor unions for new contracts.

Where efforts to address climate change have for the last 20 years focused on reducing national emissions through sweeping policies, like cap and trade or carbon taxes, climate policy today has shifted decisively toward smaller bore, pragmatic policies that don't promise to eliminate the climate crisis in one fell swoop but do help us move our economy toward greater «decarbonization,» sector by sector and technology by technology.

Here in Sweden we don't have a trading exchange for carbon emissions but we have had a tax on these emissions for some twenty odd years and it doesn't work at all.

In other words, they would accept a commitment to a global carbon price, as advocated on this website, because it does not ask countries to trade billions of dollars worth of permits with other countries.

That the United Nations, most governments of the world, and all those involved in carbon trading schemes are salivating at the thought of taxing the snot out of all of us, redistributing wealth from rich to poor countries, making billions on carbon trading schemes, and having a one - world order fired up where we'll all do the United Nations bidding just makes me more suspicious about sending up one - armed satellites.

I do nt have a clear sense on how long it will take the public to realise that carbon trading is likely to be scammed.

The carbon offset, trading and what have you that we are being conned on do not remove one molecule of carbon dioxide from the 35 % and growing overload of that gas already on the globe causing melting, coral destruction, and various shifts in biota to relocate their niches for proper temperatures to survive.

On the subject of regulation, either a carbon tax or a cap - and - trade system, Gingrich and Lomborg push the conservative party line: regulations hurt the economy and don't help the climate.

With a multi-pronged attack on carbon emissions and related pollution, cap - and - trade may be only one component, or the price may even collapse if they don't establish the right cap or a floor on prices.

And although he has to deal with internal squabbles about whether cap and trade or a carbon tax is the best way to bring down greenhouse gas emissions, at least the Obama team does agree on the goal.

Given that, if one wants freedom of choice and an efficient market, shouldn't one accept a market solution (tax / credit or analogous system based on public costs, applied strategically to minimize paperwork (don't tax residential utility bills — apply upstream instead), applied approximately fairly to both be fair and encourage an efficient market response (don't ignore any significant category, put all sources of the same emission on equal footing; if cap / trade, allow some exchange between CO2 and CH4, etc, based CO2 (eq); include ocean acidification, etc.), allowing some approximation to that standard so as to not get very high costs in dealing with small details and also to address the biggest, most - well understood effects and sources first (put off dealing with the costs and benifits of sulphate aerosols, etc, until later if necessary — but get at high - latitude black carbon right away)?

And I do have a problem with someone that lives in a huge energy inefficient mansion, that flies around on private jets and that has huge investments in carbon trading firms telling me that I must make very basic and life shattering sacrifices to save the planet, but who obviously believes that because he invented the internet he is exempt from the same.

Why fiddle around with carbon trading when we could be doing carbon removal from our biosphere by using the pyrolysis process on the massive ever - expanding messes of organic wastes and sewage solids that present handling procedures allow to naturally biodegrade to reemit carbon dioxide that nature trapped in biochemicals.

So what did make the final budget cut — and is America still on track for a greener future?Unfortunately, not that carbon cap and trade — there's still room for the system in the budget, but after 28 Senators protested the cap, it was left out.

Efficiency does not happen all by itself in a power - sector carbon - cap - and - trade program for various reasons (see ACEEE's report on these issues).

... Clifford Chance took on climate change by attempting to do for carbon and emissions trading what Michael Milken and Drexel did for junk bonds: Standardize the disclosure and documentation to make the market more liquid.