Not exact matches
And if you like that one blog that
does a lot of research
on Safe Withdrawal Rates and publishes case studies for fellow FIRE enthusiasts and other fun personal finance content (wink, wink) please consider nominating it in one (or all?)
For example, the
safe withdrawal rate changes over time depending
on equity valuations and the
safe withdrawal rate can be vastly different depending
on your age and expectations about Social Security, see two case studies I
did recently at ChooseFI and last week here
on our blog.
They understand the stakes of permitting honest posting
on something like
safe withdrawal rates or the Plan B gibberish (even if they
do not possess a full understanding of the investing realities).
Juicy Excerpt: I knew that the
safe withdrawal rate studies
did not contain adjustments for the valuation level that applies
on the day the retirement begins.
My good friend Mike Piper has written an article («Investing Based
on Market Valuation») at his Oblivious Investor blog exploring my finding that the Old School
safe withdrawal rate studies get the numbers wildly wrong (promoted recently by my other good friend Todd Tresidder) and the research
done by my other good friend Wade Pfau showing that Valuation - Informed Indexing has for the entire 140 years for which we have market data available to us provided far higher returns at greatly reduced risk.
Ataloss argued that the reason why I say that the Old School
safe -
withdrawal -
rate (SWR) studies are analytically invalid is that I don't approve of relying
on historical stock - return data to determine the SWR.