I did read your response, and I have to say, it made me sad to hear about your experience.
Did you read my response?
Re # 215: Er,
did you read my response?
Not exact matches
Don't reply right away, give it an hour or two; think of a good, professional
response, draft it a few times and let someone else
read it again.
My
response was a simple message that
read «If fundamentals don't matter, what if Coca - Cola never sold another bottle of Coke?
My
response: I
did not forget, but you also appear to have not
read any of my comments to anyone else in this thread.
In Religion the same applies, as a member you must always
do what is right and not simply choose to follow any and every command, its in the manual of the Bible, you should
read it someday so that you can make an informed and educated
response in the future.
Reading through these
responses, it's very clear who understands Christianity and who
does not... who personally knows Jesus and who
does not.
How odd that after
reading such a beautiful article about love your
response is to generalize and lash out at professors (many of whom
do not fit your suggested profile).
Veritas tried to claim I was using the bible to prove the truth, however it is trivially easy to see that I never once on this thread quoted the bible on anything he probably
did nt even
read my post, it is just a stock
response.
if you can think at all,
did you
read tsq
responses bellow, that is what i am looking for!
But why
read a story about, say Lent, and then take all that time and energy to make a nasty
response about something you don't believe in?
It appears you either don't want to understand the answer or you didn't bother
reading my
response in the first place.
I
read it as an unintentional cri
du coeur: a confession of catechetical disaster and pastoral failure on a nationwide scale, to which the German episcopate has no
response save to urge others down the path that has led Catholicism in Germany into profound incoherence.
Therefore I
did read all of those
responses.
I would venture to say that anything you are
reading into his
response says more about you than it
does about him.
I fail to see how that
response has anything to
do with the point that I was trying to make, and, seeing as how you seem to have missed my postings intention entirely, I will not bother
reading too deeply into your thoughtful analysis of my commentary in return, which would no doubt be an engaging and intellectual adventure.
The typical
response someone struggling with porn receives from their Church might be to
read their Bible more, memorize Scripture and love Jesus more but Roberts explains that «trying harder» doesn't work.
Your
response, while valid, is the equivalent to giving a book that explains the virtues of literacy to a man that can't
read and doesn't want to...
I will take time to address the entirety of your
response when able to
do so, but for now, after a cursory
reading, am left to wonder: When Jesus said, My God, my God, why
did You forsake me?
I'll admit I
did not
read the book but was interested in the
responses of the readers.
His work The True Word largely survives because the 3rd century teacher Origen made a very longwinded
response to it, Against Celsus (which definitely falls into the category of books I have
read so that you don't have to).
@mennoknight, not to be seen as piling on, I didn't
read all the
responses I admit, but the story of Jesus, if written by the Greeks, would have been a comedy or a tragedy, depending on who wrote it.
-------- You don't
read any condescention in take
response from Bob?
From
reading and seeing his
response I
do not see or my spirit
does not sense repenrance.
Rob's
response here
does not really address good criticism, but it
does make a good point at the end — you generally should not criticize books you have not
read.
But wait, I don't recall
reading god's
response to his only son's plea.
Some months ago a comment on plagiarism was titled, «He who steals my words...» In
response to a reader who complained that the title itself was semi-plagiarized, I rather snippily said that anyone who didn't recognize the Shakespeare reference shouldn't be
reading the journal.
Your
response makes it sound like you didn't even
read the article.
Does CNN care about their image as a news outlet, or is it enough that people are
reading an article, regardless of their
response?
That was also a predictable
response; after all, why
does the pastor ask to talk with you if not to get you to take your prayer life and Bible -
reading more seriously?
I
do believe you are young, full of yourself and find that you never to
read back through the posts on this site for people's
responses that were sent to you days after you posted.
If you
read the comments and ask family members who were in attendance of the practice and actual graduation, you will see an overwhelmhing
response that he WAS NOT ordered and / or asked to
do anything that would infringe upon his religious beliefs.
... wow, lot's of mis - statements here by people speculating about the Bible and Jesus, including those of you who think the books of the Bible were written a few hundred years ago (Moses penned it around 1400BC)... the Bible is a collection of the most investigated writings of all time, so there is a tremendous amount of credible archeological and scientific material in this world available for review rooted in verifiable investigations... my
response,
read the Bible,
do your own investigation, determine the Truth for yourself... hopefully, anne rice's denouncement of faith in the God of the Bible (it's difficult for me to believe she ever had Saving Faith in the first place) will bring some readers to investigate and find the Truth... God will call the Elect, not one more, not one less...
In
response to ariaramnes Where
did you
read that SIkhs practice intolerance to non-Sikhs in their country???? I have lived in the State of Punjab for last 30 yrs and am yet to see that happen.
I didn't
read it with unbiased eyes, and I'm admitting that, but I think that the thoughts that came to me in that state are valid, even if they aren't valid
responses precisely to what he was saying.
Dear PATIAT, (In
response) Exactly!!!! I can't give the author any points for «making an effort» to offer a carnal spin on something spiritual and i never said «It's not like that» God's word
does that for her BUT she must
read it with a spiritual mind and let go of her carnal one.
I have
read a lot of comments posted in
response to this aticle and while my life is not perfect, I
do live in peace.
Laughing — yet again you fail, you sit here and you tell me in one breath that i'm wrong in dealing with absolutes, Yet My whole point in the previous post was to point out that I can't blame science for killing Billions of people because they created the bombs and guns to
do so... Just like you can't blame Christianity for people using violence against others, it's the people not the ideology that caused the violence, and i believe that... for whatever reason you apparently missed that and tried to make me sound like i honestly blame science for killing billions... so... maybe you need some
reading and comprehension classes... i
du n no, just would appreciate if you're going to argue with me, that you actually
read my
responses.
After
reading your
responses to my post, «When a Theology Just Doesn't Feel Right,» I felt it appropriate to address the topic of biblical authority, as our discussion often drifted in that direction.
Billed as «a Catholic
response to «End Times» fever,» this is a popular, easy to
read, and theologically reliable statement of what the Catholic Church, on the basis of Scripture,
does and
does not teach about the consummation of history.
blog
responses are poor on showing emotion, so don't
read into anything what i didn «t say.
And in
response to # 11, I don't have kids / don't want kids / kids make me kind of nervous, but I absolutely LOVE
reading about Jacob.
Thank you SO SO MUCH Often when I
read vegan blogs I don't get a
response on substitutes — which can be frustrating because I live in SA where vegans are not really catered for.
Have not
read all the
responses, but I
do want to second what this man is saying: cookbooks and cooking sites all assume that we have the lingo, when many of us
do not.
I
did exactly as you instructed (but I
read your
response after I made it, so felt good that we were on the same page).
Did you not
read my comment or are you just cut and pasting a
response?
Did anyone
read Robbie Savage's
response to John Terry?
If I
did write just one (more) column, it would run 10,000 words... and the very next day, I would
read something else that deserved a
response.
I don't know what tone you
read my
response in but it most certainly wasn't patronising.