How
did simple organisms like yeast and worms evolve into ones as complex as birds and mammals?
Not exact matches
All an evolutionary storyteller has to
do is to start with the apparently
simplest version, ignore the neural equipment that has to be present for an
organism to make any use of a «photon receptor,» and spin a charming tale about how a tiny primitive light - sensing cell might grow up to be a full - fledged eye.
Recombinant DNA research has been
done primarily on bacteria, one - celled
organisms smaller than animal or plant cells and
simpler in structure, yet capable of very complex chemical activity.
I don't mean taking for granted things that are totally unproven, like the fundamental process of complex
organisms spontaneously emerging from
simpler ones.
I'll even offer observations - humans have manipulated existing
organisms dna, created new virus and bacteria, clone animals, and attempt to create new animals - yet
simple minded folks still reject the idea that another more intelligent creature might have
done the same thing and created life on earth in the same fashion while at the same time acknowledging that there is a strong likelihood of other life existing in this universe - talk about being dumbed down and arrogant.
While some of the metamorphoses that
DO occur in nature, eg caterpillar into butterfly or tadpole into frog, are as spectacular or arguably even more spectacular than your fish to frog morph, the
simple fact is that evolution doesn't happen to individual
organisms.
Perhaps they
do something different in these
simpler organisms, and membrane remodeling evolved later.
How
does a single - celled
organism, one of the
simplest life forms on Earth, manage to satisfy its nutritional needs?
«A lot of what
organisms do could actually be engineered in a much
simpler way,» Wagner said.
There's a lot of attention right now on how neurons fire and interact with each other, but the truth is, we don't even understand how a brain develops — even in the most
simple of
organisms like C. elegans, a worm with only 300 brain cells.
«All
organisms with complex cells have sex, so why is it that
simple, single - celled
organisms never evolved to
do so?
Knock out the commands that let a digital
organism do one of these
simple operations and it may not be able to add.
Some
simple organisms like bacteria can survive without oxygen, but all higher
organisms need oxygen and Earth's biology would probably be a poor sight, if the atmosphere
did not contain the 21 percent oxygen, which is essential for the human brain to function, for example.
Neuroscientists vying to find credible consciousness indicators in
simpler organisms may be overlooking the most direct way to
do so...
Antibiotics and other modern medicines
do not work on viruses because these radically
simple organisms infiltrate cells and hijack their processes to serve their own purposes.
«In those
simple organisms, scientists teased out exactly what the repeat region was
doing, and the same principles were at work in human cells.
Technologies to visualize neurons in live subjects — as well as process such gargantuan volumes of data —
do not yet exist, so only post-mortem studies in
simpler organisms are even presently imaginable.
The reason for this is very
simple: when you don't eat enough to support the healthy functioning of every system in the
organism for longer periods, your body slows down some of them in an effort to spare energy for more vital functions, and the reproductive system is the first one to get shut.
I doubt you will find any complex
organisms (probably
simple as well) with exponential growth and I don't see why trees shouldn't be included in that characterisation.