Sentences with phrase «did under criminal law»

Not exact matches

Last month, the federal government released guidelines to regulate online taxi companies, saying they should do stringent security checks and not contract anyone convicted of a «cognizable offense» under India's criminal laws.

How do you argue those counterfeit water pipes are illegal under trademark law when the original is illegal under federal criminal law?

But natural law, like much of civil law, has the humbler task of collaring the criminal and resisting what may under no circumstances be condoned, a task that must be done before elaborating the possibilities for greater perfection.

The ACCC secured its first criminal case under the laws in 2017 against Japanese shipping company NYK, which was fined $ 25 million, and has launched another case against Japanese shipping company K - Line, however Mr Sims said they were «foreign companies and don't involve individuals».

No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under national or international law at the time when it was committed.

The charge read, «That you, Joachim Iroko, aka Joe, and others still at large, on Saturday, August 13, 2016, at about 5.30 pm at the Ketere area, Sango, in the Ota Magisterial District did conduct yourselves in a manner likely to cause breach of the peace, by writing a name, Buhari, on a dog and parading same in the Hausa section of Ketere Market, Sango, thereby, committing an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 249 (d) of the Criminal Law of Ogun State, Nigeria, 2016.»

While we do not celebrate the criminal prosecution of Terry James, we laud District Attorney David Soares for investigating every assault at CDPC to ensure patients and staff are treated equally under the law.

«About 24 states have adopted the Child's Right Act, and under the law, which is applicable in Bayelsa State, what Yunusa did is purely criminal — kidnapping, forced marriage, rape, sexual assault on a girl who was 13 last year.

Law enforcement sources told the NY Daily News that Weiner, 51, was not currently under criminal investigation because the photo in question didn't rise to the level of endangering the welfare of a child.

But under Mayor Bill de Blasio, the department doesn't call in the state Attorney General's Office or the feds to help with civil or criminal prosecution, or pursue civil cases through the city Law Department, Terrell says.

Backing his claim with Article 13 of the Constitution which says «no person shall be deprived of his life intentionally except in the exercise of the execution of a sentence of a court in respect of a criminal offence under the laws of Ghana of which he has been convicted,» the caucus leader and Minister for Parliamentary Affairs said, «I do not think that the constitution, in so far as a matter is criminal, frowns upon the use of force to the extent that it may even deprive some other people of their lives.

«That you Abimbola Adeniyi and Tope Ogidiolu did willfully and maliciously damage the uniform of number 458158 corporal belonging to Adeosun Taiwo and thereby committed an offence and punishable under section 451 of the criminal code cap 16 volume 1 of the laws of Ekiti State».

On the other hand you are operating under an exemption to an existing criminal code law so maybe you should just do what the good folks at the regulators tell you to do.

To do so would be a violation of copyright law, punishable under the criminal code.

Under the Melloni doctrine, if EU law does not provide the full harmonisation of a matter, national criminal courts «are free» — i.e. they are permitted but not obliged under EU law — to apply higher national standards of fundamental riUnder the Melloni doctrine, if EU law does not provide the full harmonisation of a matter, national criminal courts «are free» — i.e. they are permitted but not obliged under EU law — to apply higher national standards of fundamental riunder EU law — to apply higher national standards of fundamental rights.

If your employer does not carry workers» comp (which is a criminal offense), you are still entitled to benefits under the Uninsured Employers» Fund (UEF), established through the New Jersey workers» compensation law.

So, under the pending fresh UK law for criminal deportation, do you think Theresa May and the conservative government should send serious EU criminals back to the mainland?

Suborning perjury is a criminal offense, at the federal level under 18 USC 1622, and is especially bad for a law firm to do.

Any managing partner who isn't having sleepless nights over it is not doing their job properly — it's a huge issue for us and for all UK and international law firms, which are under pretty constant attack from cyber criminals.»

The criminal case does not provide compensation to the victim of a crime — it seeks justice against the person who has committed a crime as defined under Florida law.

By contrast, whether the Charter also applies to the national rules determining under what conditions police and judicial authorities can access the retained data is less obvious, because Directive 2002 / 58 / EC does not cover «activities of the State in areas of criminal law» (Art. 1 (3)-RRB-.

One of my problems with anonymization under family law is that it does not bear any comprehensive test of coherence along all «material world» publication policies or rights of all privacy sensible fields of law such as criminal but even more so administrative decisions such as rent tribunal and social welfare.

Experts also said that the term «aggravated felony» does not exist under criminal law, despite its use as grounds for...

In doing so, the CJEU followed the viewpoint of the ICC, which had argued in its referring Order n. 24/2017 (English translation available here) that rules on the limitation period belong to substantive criminal law and thus fall under the scope of the principle of legality and its corollaries (p. 3).

As reported in the written decision of the Law Society Hearing Panel (which decision is under appeal by the applicant), the applicant threatened to sue the other board members for defamation after he was removed as President of the condo corporation and a notice of his removal was posted; circulated a letter (under a false name) on some floors within the building that falsely stated that some of the board members had previously gone bankrupt, had criminal convictions and were accepting bribes and free meals from the developer of the condominium to settle deficiencies with the developer; made a derogatory remark about some of the residents based on their ethnicity; threatened to report some of the directors to US / Canada border officials, falsely alleging that they were drug smugglers; threatened both the corporation's property manager and security services firm that their contracts with the condo corporation would be in jeopardy if they did not provide a character letter to the applicant.

A parent who does not pay can be prosecuted under the state's criminal laws.

It is useful to quote key observations by Stadlen J [at paras 126 - 129]: «In my view, notwithstanding the absence in the FTPP proceedings of some of the statutory and non-statutory safeguards which apply to criminal proceedings... [I] n deciding whether it would be fair to admit the hearsay evidence, the requirements both of Article 6 and of the common law obliged the FTPP to take into account the absence of all those [safeguards]... [I] n my judgment, no reasonable panel in the position of the FTPP could have reasonably concluded that there were factors outweighing the powerful factors pointing against the admission of the hearsay evidence... The means by which the claimant can challenge the hearsay evidence are... not in my judgment capable of outweighing those factors... The reality would appear to be that the factor which the FTPP considered decisive in favour of admitting the hearsay evidence was the serious nature of the allegations against the claimant coupled with the public interest in investigating such allegations and the FTPP's duty to protect the public interest in protecting patients, maintaining public confidence in the profession and declaring and upholding proper standards of behaviour... However, that factor on its own does not in my view diminish the weight which must be attached to the procedural safeguards to which a person accused of such allegations is entitled both at common law and under Article 6... The more serious the allegation, the greater the importance of ensuring that the accused doctor is afforded fair and proper procedural safeguards.

I am thus particularly pleased — and relieved — that the book is met with comments that enquire about the potential reach and limitations of my findings but not the general idea that it is legitimate and legally possible for international criminal lawyers to consider ESCR violations as part of what «their» body of law — under certain circumstances — can engage with (and has actually done so).

But ratifying CAT did not, by itself, make torture criminal or punishable under domestic US criminal law; the US simply became obligated to «ensure that all acts of torture [we] re offences under its criminal law» (art. 4).

However, perhaps a prosecution of a law society under Criminal Code s. 122 for its failure to perform its duties in regard to access to justice by at least trying to solve the unaffordable legal services problem would fail because, even if an official knows that a decision does affect his / her personal interests, there is no offence, «if the decision is made honestly and in a genuine belief that it was a proper exercise of his jurisdiction.

They wrote: «The provisions of the AHR Act concerning controlled activities, namely those involving assistance for human reproduction and related research activities, do not fall under the criminal law power, but belong to the jurisdiction of the provinces over hospitals, civil rights and local matters.»

The unauthorized reproduction of copyrighted information, like the employer's list, constitutes an infringement of copyright under [the Copyright] Act but does not constitute theft under the criminal law.

We do not cover: 1) loss or expense recoverable under any other insurance or through an employer; 2) loss or expense arising from or attributable to: (a) dishonest or criminal acts committed or attempted by You; (b) alleged violation of the laws of the country You are visiting, unless We determine such allegations to be fraudulent, or c) failure to maintain required documents or visas; 3) loss or expense arising from or attributable to: (a) debt, insolvency, business or commercial failure; (b) the repossession of any property; or © Your non - compliance with a contract, license or permit; 4) loss or expense arising from or due to liability assumed by You under any contract.

We do not cover: 1) loss or expense recoverable under any other insurance or through an employer; 2) loss or expense arising from or attributable to: a) dishonest or criminal acts committed or attempted by You; b) alleged violation of the laws of the country You are visiting, unless We determine such allegations to be fraudulent, or c) failure to maintain required documents or visas; 3) loss or expense arising from or attributable to: a) debt, insolvency, business or commercial failure; b) the repossession of any property; or c) Your non - compliance with a contract, license or permit; 4) loss or expense arising from or due to liability assumed by You under any contract.

According to Arizona law, major violations such as reckless driving, driving under influence (DUI) and other criminal violations do not give eligibility for a defensive driving class.

Also, really absurdly nitpicky note: under the «Don't include irrelevant info» paragraph it looks like the «arraignments» was written (def: A criminal proceeding at which the defendant is officially called before a court of competent jurisdiction, informed of the offense charged in the complaint, information, indictment, or other charging document, and asked to enter a plea of guilty, not guilty, or as otherwise permitted by law.

If a parent can not comply with parenting time arrangements, despite their good faith efforts to do so, or if they are inadvertently late for a pickup or drop off, it would not be wise to immediately seek court sanctions under either the family law or criminal law statutes.

the police first said they can't do any thing BUT I reminded them the tenancy ended with eviction and their lease was for the first unit... sitting in the other unit was in fact not covered under the Tenancy Act and dropped into the lap of criminal law.