The outcomes revealed that the amount of disturbances while in REM sleep was decreased more in the Mediterranean
diet group compared to the other group.
Not exact matches
At the end of the year, people in the standard
diet group and the fasting
group lost similar amounts of weight
compared with those who didn't do any type of
diet at all.
The mechanism of greater fat loss in time - restricted feeding
group compared to the normal
diet group seems to be due to the different time of meal distribution.
The study of Moro and her colleagues
compared two
groups of resistance trained athletes, the one
group used the time - restricted feeding while the other
group was on a normal
diet.
Researchers
compared people who ate a Mediterranean
diet based on nuts and a
group based on olive oil.
The scientists found that 89 % of participants on the intervention
diet achieved satisfactory glycaemic control, whereby glycated haemoglobin fell below the 7 % threshold,
compared to 50 % from the control
group.
The study discovered that stage 3 and 4 breast cancer women who supplemented their
diet with virgin coconut oil during breast cancer treatment improved fatigue, dyspnea, sleep difficulties, and loss of appetite
compared to the control
group.
More than half of the participants in the
diet beverage
group, or 64 per cent, lost at least five percent of their body weight,
compared with only 43 percent of the water
group.
While both
groups cut their food intake significantly, after six months the
diet beverage
group had a greater likelihood of reaching a meaningful (5 percent) amount of weight loss
compared to the control
group.
Both Mediterranean
diet interventions were associated with a lower risk of PAD
compared with the control
group.
In addition,
compared to mice on a regular
diet, brain cells from animals in the olive oil
group showed a dramatic increase in nerve cell autophagy activation, which was ultimately responsible for the reduction in levels of amyloid plaques and phosphorylated tau.
The modified
diet provided just 10 percent of its calories from carbohydrates,
compared with 55 percent of calories from carbohydrates in a control
group.
They
compared the abundance of microbiota in rats given continuous access to either a healthy
diet or junk food with a
group cycled between the two
diets, healthy for four days and junk for three, over 16 weeks.
The sperm of offspring from the malnourished mothers had fewer methyl
groups in 111 regions of DNA
compared with that of mice born to mothers on a healthy
diet.
In the Ex-
diet group, serum total cholesterol (P < 0.001) and LDL - C (P < 0.001) were reduced after eight weeks,
compared to the C -
diet group.
When
comparing the two
groups, the rate of weight gain was almost double on higher - versus lower - calorie
diets, and patients receiving more calories were hospitalized for an average of seven fewer days, without an increased risk of refeeding syndrome.
His
group is now preparing a more ambitious study that
compares the microbiomes of people who completely avoid emulsifiers for several weeks with those on a standard Western
diet.
The researchers plan to carry out phase III randomized controlled clinical trials to determine the actual rate of effectiveness by
comparing those treated with the ketogenic
diet to a
group tube - fed a normal, nonketogenic
diet.
CD
diets induce steatosis, inflammation and fibrosis over 10 weeks without any difference in body weight
compared to the control
group (6).
After three months, a third of those in the Mediterranean
diet group reported significant symptom relief,
compared with just 8 % of the control
group.
According to their results, they showed lower inclination for gaining fat around the waistline
compared to the
group eating low - fat
diet.
They
compared this intervention to a control
group who followed a heart healthy
diet plan provided by the National Cholesterol Education Program's guidelines.
In a study performed at Johns Hopkins, the researchers recorded that the people who was on high - fats
diet took 25 days fewer to lose 10 pounds
compared to the
group that was on high carbs
diet.
Obese mice that ate a high - fat
diet along with the green tea compound EGCG (Epigallocatechin -3-gallate) gained weight significantly more slowly
compared to a control
group of mice which didn't get the green tea supplement.
Then again, in a randomized trial of high - cardiovascular - risk people who were given the Mediterranean
diet supplemented with either nuts or free extra virgin olive oil and were
compared with people on a low - fat
diet, there was no difference in diabetes incidence between the 2 variants of the Mediterranean
diet in comparison to the low fat
diet group.
They were
compared to a
group eating nearly 40 % of calories from fat representing the average
diet in the public.
Body weight was one of the differences seen between the 2
groups, the canola oil - enriched
diet mice weighed considerably more
compared to those on the regular
diet.
Using 24 - hour dietary recall and 24 hour urine samples they
compared the
diets of 4
groups of people from the USA, UK, China and Japan.
For this reason, a
group of researchers
compared the effects of a higher - fat, lower - carb DASH
diet to the conventional -LSB-...]
Researchers at Loughborough University studied healthy, college - aged women on a calorie - restricted
diet and discovered that they ate an additional 300 calories, on average, at dinner
compared to the control
group, who ate three standard meals.
Does anybody know any studies that would directly
compare the «paleolithic and vegetarian / vegan
diets, and maybe a
group such as «western
diet»?
One year later, this
group were
compared with another
group of patients on the same standard drugs but paid no attention to
diet or stress reduction.
The ketogenic
diet group gained 4.3 kg lean mass (muscle)
compared to only 2.2 kg for the traditional
diet group
Of those on a Med
diet, the
group eating 1 - 3 servings of nuts per week ate 4.9 grams of nuts per day and enjoyed a hazard ratio of 0.38 with respect to all - cause mortality
compared to those eating a Mediterranean
diet and no nuts.
At the completion of the study, in
comparing the two
groups, those eating the low - carb
diet with lots of dietary fat experienced dramatically more weight loss, more reduction of body fat, lower triglycerides, and remarkably higher HDL.
One study in overweight adults with type 2 diabetes found that a high - MUFA
diet led to significant reductions in liver fat
compared to a control
diet, regardless of how much physical activity each
group performed (27).
In a two - week study
comparing a low - calorie
diet to a non-calorie-restricted, low - carb
diet in 18 adults with NAFLD, those in the low - carb
group experienced a 55 % reduction in liver fat vs. a 26 % for the low - fat
group (22).
At any rate, it's important to note that this study wasn't truly controlled (they
compared to some historical patient values), and was confounded by a low - fat dietary change, so we can't know how much was the
diet change, the flax, or any other potential factors since it didn't have a true control
group.
When researchers
compare low - carb to low - fat
diets in scientific studies, they need to actively restrict calories in the low - fat
groups, while the low - carb
groups can eat until fullness (3).
For example, a study
comparing Jews when they lived in Yemen, whose
diets contained fats solely of animal origin, to Yemenite Jews living in Israel, whose
diets contained margarine and vegetable oils, revealed little heart disease or diabetes in the former
group but high levels of both diseases in the latter.14 (The study also noted that the Yemenite Jews consumed no sugar but those in Israel consumed sugar in amounts equaling 25 - 30 % of total carbohydrate intake.)
People who replaced saturated fat in their
diet with polyunsaturated fat (omega 3/6) reduce their risk of coronary heart disease by 19 percent,
compared with control
groups of people who do not.
In the study we mentioned earlier a
diet containing MCTs led to a lower daily calorie intake per day
compared to the control
group [3].
In addition, drug - injected rats on the stricter 6.6:1 ketogenic
diet — much stronger than
diets used clinically — already had a slightly but significantly reduced mechanical threshold at the eight - day time point
compared to vehicle (Fig. 6C); however, this
group at this time point did not differ significantly from drug - injected rats on the other two
diets.
This pattern could be interpreted as a delayed onset to allodynia, yet scores from ketogenic
diet - fed and control
diet - fed nerve - damaged mice never differed significantly, and a small change in ketogenic
diet - fed sham - surgery mice at weeks 1 and 2 probably contributed to a loss of statistical significance when
comparing sham versus treatment animal within each
diet group.
No loss of fat free mass in the absence of weight loss was observed
compared to a control
group fed a standardized
diet (69).
A 2009 systematic review of randomised controlled studies that
compared low - carbohydrate
diets to low - fat / low - calorie
diets found that measurements of weight, HDL cholesterol, triglyceride levels and systolic blood pressure were significantly better in
groups that followed low - carbohydrate
diets.
Feeding the HF
diet markedly induced hypertrophy of the adipocytes in the epididymal white adipose tissue
compared with the control
group.
A
group of US researchers
compared the effectiveness of low - carb and low - fat
diets on causing weight loss and improving risk factors for heart disease.
So if we were to
compare veganism with a
diet full of whole foods including a moderate amount of lean meats and fish, I think the average weight of the two
groups would be very similar.
This optimization in LDL cholesterol was less pronounced in the low fat
group compared to the low - carb ketogenic
diet group.