The researchers were able to rank
those diets by their greenhouse gas emissions.
Not exact matches
If Americans in the highest - impact group shifted their
diets to align with the U.S. average —
by consuming fewer overall calories and relying less on meat — the one - day
greenhouse -
gas emissions reduction would be equivalent to eliminating 661 million passenger - vehicle miles, according to the researchers.
They ranked the
diets by their associated
greenhouse gas emissions, from lowest to highest, then divided them into five equal groups, or quintiles.
In terms of climate policy, the healthier
diets could contribute up to 23 percent of the U.S. Climate Action Plan goal to reduce net
greenhouse gas emissions 17 percent below 2005 levels
by 2020, Cleveland said.
This is according to a new study
by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University who found that if Americans were to switch their
diets to fall in line with the Agriculture Department's 2010 dietary recommendations, it would result in a 38 percent increase in energy use, 10 percent bump in water use and a 6 percent increase in
greenhouse gas emissions.
The study's authors write that halving the amount of food waste and managing demand for particularly environmentally - damaging food products
by changing global
diets should be key aims that, if achieved, might mitigate some of the
greenhouse gases causing climate change.
The projected transition of livestock systems from pure grazing
diets to
diets supplemented
by higher quality feeds will cut
greenhouse gas emissions from land use change globally
by as much as 23 %
by 2030, while improving food availability and farmers» income, shows new IIASA research.
According to an assessment
by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, «the contribution of the livestock sector to global
greenhouse gas emissions exceeds that of transportation,» and a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences estimated the impact of a global move to a plant - based
diet could reduce global mortality
by 6 to 10 percent and reduce food - related
greenhouse gas emissions
by 29 to 70 percent.
The crazy thing is that if people followed the whole foods plant - based
diet advocated
by Dr. G. and others, we would save trillions of dollars, get rid of our worst health problems, and solve the global warming problem (since 50 % of
greenhouse gasses due to animal «agriculture»).
So it's within this context that CAT releases it's third incarnation of Zero Carbon Britain, claiming that a rapid decarbonization of the UK could be achieved
by massively ramping up wind power and other renewables; aggressive efforts to promote energy efficiency and demand management; incentives to shift the UK's
diet away from animal products to both combat obesity and reduce
greenhouse gas emissions; and managing fluctuation of renewables supply
by meeting shortfalls through using synthetic
gas made from renewable, sustainably grown biomass energy crops.
Sustainable
diets for the future: can we contribute to reducing
greenhouse gas emissions
by eating a healthy
diet?
«With the healthy
diet that still contained some meat, global
greenhouse gas emissions from the food sector only increased 7 percent
by 2050, compared with an expectation of a 51 percent increase under business as usual.