Sentences with phrase «difference in forcing»

So we should not see any difference in the forcing analysis.

We're talking mere hours of lag for a huge difference in forcing.

So the earth is a heat engine, like a Sterling Engine, and it operates on the difference in forcing at the equator vs the poles.

The amount of heat transfer is determined primarily by the difference in forcing from different objects.

Thus, if the CO2 band center is sufficiently close to saturation at TRPP, the forcing per doubling will be smaller at TOA, implying some cooling of the space in between (equal to the difference in forcing between TRPP and TOA; the climatic response will, via cooling, reduce the fluxes out of the stratosphere by the same amount; some fraction of this can go into the troposphere, and since it is a reduced downward flux, it cancels out some of the initial TRPP forcing, resulting in a smaller TRPP forcing (the forcing with stratospheric adjustment) that the surface + troposphere must respond to.

In that case what makes up the difference in forcing magnitude between the forward and reverse directions is the difference in the temperature - profile feedback.

The difference in force imparts a measurable shift in the final state of the two matter waves when they recombine, creating an interference pattern.

The fatigue index was calculated as the difference in force from the first contraction and every tenth subsequent contraction, and plotted as a fatigue curve.

The rate of fatigue (i.e., fatigue index) was quantified by calculating the percent difference in force of the initial contraction and every subsequent contraction, with values plotted as fatigue curves.

Figs. 1a and c demonstrate the differences in force curves on stiff and soft samples.

Look at the difference between Scenario B and C. Despite the large difference in forcings in the later years, the long term trend over that same period is similar.

The implication is that over a short period, the weather noise can mask significant differences in the forced component.

What differences in forcings is it safe to ignore in the models?

There were no significant differences in the force production of the muscles between the two groups.

This method allows even the smallest differences in forces to be detected.

What a difference in force!

Those differences in force are why fast low reps are great for strength but not size (not enough reps to cause the energy pathway switch necessary for maximum IGF - 1 production, not enough tissue damage), fast high reps are great for size (optimum IGF - 1 production and tissue damage), and slow low reps (no significant tissue damage) are inferior for either.

The origins of differing thickness trends and variability were isolated not to parameter differences but to differences in the forcing fields applied, and in how they are applied.

Before allowing the temperature to respond, we can consider the forcing at the tropopause (TRPP) and at TOA, both reductions in net upward fluxes (though at TOA, the net upward LW flux is simply the OLR); my point is that even without direct solar heating above the tropopause, the forcing at TOA can be less than the forcing at TRPP (as explained in detail for CO2 in my 348, but in general, it is possible to bring the net upward flux at TRPP toward zero but even with saturation at TOA, the nonzero skin temperature requires some nonzero net upward flux to remain — now it just depends on what the net fluxes were before we made the changes, and whether the proportionality of forcings at TRPP and TOA is similar if the effect has not approached saturation at TRPP); the forcing at TRPP is the forcing on the surface + troposphere, which they must warm up to balance, while the forcing difference between TOA and TRPP is the forcing on the stratosphere; if the forcing at TRPP is larger than at TOA, the stratosphere must cool, reducing outward fluxes from the stratosphere by the same total amount as the difference in forcings between TRPP and TOA.

Seems clear enough, if a tad vague: differences in forcings tend to compensate for differences in sensitivity.

Look at the difference between Scenario B and C. Despite the large difference in forcings in the later years, the long term trend over that same period is similar.

The implication is that over a short period, the weather noise can mask significant differences in the forced component.

ristvan, the point about efficacy is that these 1 - d models can't represent even basic differences in forcing and responses across the earth's surface while GCMs can.

But, once again, this may not matter in the case of the climate sensitivity since that is dealing with differences in forcings / temperatures rather than the actual values.

Hence there is a need for characterization of the forcings imposed in the CMIP5 historical and future simulations, and for diagnostics to allow us to understand the causes of the differences in forcings from model to model.

Hence it is not straightforward to understand how much of the variation between simulated climate in the models results from internal climate sensitivity and how much results from differences in the forcings.

In my comment above I should have pointed to my surmise that the Marvel approach in looking for statistically significant differences in forcing efficacies is limited by the noise in the temperature series from the individual forcings.

While there is some influence of differences in forcing patterns among the scenarios, and of effects of oceanic uptake and heat transport in modifying the patterns over time, there is also support for the role of atmospheric heat transport in offsetting such influences (e.g., Boer and Yu, 2003b; Watterson and Dix, 2005).

The resulting differences in the forcing complicate the separation of forcing and response across the multi-model ensemble.

The simulations performed with and without the direct sulphate effect (GS and G, respectively) with the same model are more similar to each other than to the other models, indicating that the individual response characteristics of the various models are dominating the response pattern rather than differences in the forcing.

Not exact matches

Our main message is that developing a theory of time allocation and occupational choice is important for understanding the forces that shape gender differences in labor market outcomes,» the researchers from Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, University of Toronto and Princeton University write.

This difference in pressure creates a propulsion force that moves the ship forward.

Champions of entrepreneurship and advocates of diversity, sexual equality and work force empowerment, these ground - breaking women are making a big difference in business today.

Michael Pettis, a professor of finance and economics at Peking University, is an expert in the Chinese economy, and he has argued for years that China's trade surplus with the United States and the rest of the world is driven by much stronger forces that the value of the Chinese currency or differences in tariff policy.

These same forces also mean that even though the resource extraction activities are concentrated in particular regions, the regional differences apparent in the initial shock tend to be reduced over time.

Much of the pressure on the sales force to convince people to do rollovers would likely drop off as the big difference in profit would go away.

If these constraints are not in place, however, analysts can no longer ignore this difference because the economy can then engage in nonproductive activity that for many years can force up the debt burden and add to GDP.

Unemployment, Marginal Attachment and Labor Force Participation in Canada and the United States Stephen Jones, McMaster University Craig Riddell, University of British Columbia Jones and Riddell build on two previous papers: one by David Card and Riddell (originally published in Small Differences that Matter) that studies the reasons for higher rates of unemployment in Canada than the U.S. in the 1980s, the other by Jones and Riddell which uses data from the U.S. Labor Force Survey to study the differences in rates of job creation for people who are counted as unemployed versus those who are counted as out of the labor fForce Participation in Canada and the United States Stephen Jones, McMaster University Craig Riddell, University of British Columbia Jones and Riddell build on two previous papers: one by David Card and Riddell (originally published in Small Differences that Matter) that studies the reasons for higher rates of unemployment in Canada than the U.S. in the 1980s, the other by Jones and Riddell which uses data from the U.S. Labor Force Survey to study the differences in rates of job creation for people who are counted as unemployed versus those who are counted as out of the lDifferences that Matter) that studies the reasons for higher rates of unemployment in Canada than the U.S. in the 1980s, the other by Jones and Riddell which uses data from the U.S. Labor Force Survey to study the differences in rates of job creation for people who are counted as unemployed versus those who are counted as out of the labor fForce Survey to study the differences in rates of job creation for people who are counted as unemployed versus those who are counted as out of the ldifferences in rates of job creation for people who are counted as unemployed versus those who are counted as out of the labor forceforce.

They also extend the analysis in the earlier Jones and Riddell paper to incorporate data from Canada, and compare differences in the rates of job creation for people who were counted as unemployed versus out of the labor force in the two countries.

Even though the current Millennials ages 25 to 32 are better educated than the generations of young adults who preceded them, 14 the survey found only one significant generational difference in the overall perceived value of their education in preparing them for a job and career — some 41 % of Millennials ages 25 to 32, 45 % of Gen Xers and 47 % of Baby Boomers say their schooling was «very useful» in getting them ready to enter the labor force.

«Government must be a force for good,» Wynne averred; it must «mak (e) a positive difference in the long and short term»: thus billions in promised infrastructure spending and the jobs that come with it; free tuition for 150,000 students; and 100,000 more daycare spaces — all done «prudent (ly),» mind you, with a balanced budget to come in the spring.

As an egalitarian I believe that a truly complementary relationship is one in which differences are celebrated, but not forced.

kudlak Not quite, modern deism believes in a creative universal force, not a supreme creative being, there is a difference, check out deism.com.

I care about the life people like you are attempting to force in to this world, you care about what appeases your god - big difference when you really don't care or consider the child only what your imaginary friend god wants and yet your god cause abortions all the time... you care about a clump of cells, not the actual life of the child and that's much worse than me supporting the rights of a woman to have control over her body, especially if the clump of cells couldn't survive outside of the host.

Such intention in the classic just war tradition, as we have seen, includes the avoidance of wrong intentions, which easily translate from Augustine's list into familiar contemporary evils: aggressive war for the aggressor's sole benefit; wars for reasons based on religious, ethnic, or ideological difference; use of force aimed at terrorizing or oppressing those on whom it falls for the benefit of the wielder of power.

He is trying to force us to recognize that in spite of what appears to be orthodox christological affirmations, we are embedded in social practices that deny that Jesus's life, death and resurrection make any difference.

Moreover, if a Zennist were to persist in his denial and to assert that Nirvana is Samsara and Samsara is Nirvana — or that there is no difference whatsoever between the sacred and the profane — we would be forced to respond that his language is only meaningful in the context of the complete dissolution of the profane consciousness.

When Enlightenment thinkers decided that the whole of nature operates in terms of mechanical forces, they concluded that the apparent difference between organisms and mechanisms is only apparent.

The difference is, that unlike in a Mind Control cult, the Armed Forces recruits know what is going on; it is expected.

Solovyev characterized the spiritual climate in Europe in the following way: «The only essential difference and inequality between people still existing in the West is the inequality of a rich man and a worker; the only grandeur, the supreme power, still having there the real force, is the grandeur and power of capital» (FNCZ 63).