The phrase
"difference in interpretation" means that two or more people can understand or explain something in different ways.
Full definition
Although there are
differences in interpretation between the five schools of law in Islam, it should be noted that Shi`a differs more sharply from the four Sunni schools in the codes it derives from the Qur» an, the Sunnah, the consensus of the religious leaders, and from individual interpretation.
If «originalism» and «living constitutionalism» can not be reconciled, and if the Constitution allows for such
radical differences in interpretation, why are we stunned to find ourselves in political gridlock, unable to even agree collectively on something as straightforward as the notion that we should pay our debts?
They appear to be related to
differences in interpretation of INDCs, assumptions about other countries, level of disaggregation for small countries, choice of global warming potentials to compute carbon dioxide equivalent emissions, treatment of emissions related to land use, and treatment of international aviation and maritime shipping.
The World Bank mentions that «PPP arrangements are long - term and complex, contracts [that] tend to be incomplete», so that «this creates room
for differences in interpretation».
Differences in interpretation should not lead us to question one another's passion or commitment to Scripture, but rather invite us into conversation with the shared assumption that we are all struggling toward truth, all trying to figure it out.
In the Middle Ages, the slogan was adduced in order to acknowledge that one may speak of a consensus among early Christian writers (consensus patrum) even if these authors displayed
some differences in their interpretations of the Scriptures.
However, as many of you pointed out, even within Calvinism there are
differences in the interpretation of «election.»
But even those differences lead to
differences in interpretation.
We respectfully repeat our request that you stop suggesting
the differences in interpretation exist only between IBFAN and the industry.
If
the difference in interpretation arises from your experiments, then you will need to provide additional data to back up your claims.
For instance, students could discuss the similarities and
differences in their interpretations, or the teacher could model academic language and teach essential background information.
I don't see this as doing «whatever you please,» but rather as
a difference in interpretation of the TOS.
i think this is
the difference in interpretation that is going on
Second, this blog is always on the lookout for
differences in interpretation or application that the courts find between the Federal Arbitration Act and the New York Convention, especially that part that is codified as U.S. law in 9 U.S.C.. Here, the Court of Appeals states that: A «district court ‟ s primary authority to compel arbitration in the international context comes from 9 U.S.C. § 206, rather than from 9 U.S.C. § 4».
This post will consider
the difference in the interpretation of «genuine and determining occupational requirements».
An excellent way to spot
any differences in interpretation is to have both your team and your counterparty's explain the deal in their own words.