The Reno - area school district found a 21 - point
difference in math scores and a 20 - point difference in English - Language Arts (ELA) scores between students with low and high social and emotional competencies.
Combining the results of the student social - skills surveys and school climate surveys accounted for 21 percent of
the difference in math scores for the lowest - performing 5 percent of low - performing schools.
They found bigger, though not statistically significant, benefits in reading for students who had attended pre-K as compared with those who started KIPP in kindergarten, and
no difference in math scores.
Moreover, to the extent that testing nonalignment explains some of the very large 0.4 standard deviation
difference in math scores, it is unlikely that it explains all or even most of that difference.
Ferguson noted that the quality of the teacher (as determined by test scores, level of education, and experience) accounts for 43 percent of
the difference in math scores of students in grades 3 to 5.
It is tough to see precise numbers under 100 but looking at the all - important blue chart it appears as if approximately 10 schools had a -25 %
difference in their maths score this year.
Not exact matches
Comparing national test
scores, Catholic schools
in general (as with most private schools) perform better
in both reading and
math than public schools although the advantage is stronger
in reading than
in Math though the
difference in Math was still statistically significant; however, this could be due to the self selecting nature of the students
in Catholic schools where the parents have made the decision to value education to the extent of paying for it.
Ladner found that the reading and
math test
scores of 3rd graders were higher
in schools that offered all - day kindergarten or pre-K, but by 5th grade the
differences had disappeared.
In addition, the differences in test - score gains between bottom - and top - quartile students on each non-cognitive skill amount to almost a full year's worth of learning in math over the middle school year
In addition, the
differences in test - score gains between bottom - and top - quartile students on each non-cognitive skill amount to almost a full year's worth of learning in math over the middle school year
in test -
score gains between bottom - and top - quartile students on each non-cognitive skill amount to almost a full year's worth of learning
in math over the middle school year
in math over the middle school years.
In contrast, students who were rated proficient on the MCAS math exam had a significantly lower math GPA (2.39) than students scoring in the college - and - career ready group for PARCC in math (2.81); this margin is equivalent to the difference between a «C +» and a «B -.&raqu
In contrast, students who were rated proficient on the MCAS
math exam had a significantly lower
math GPA (2.39) than students
scoring in the college - and - career ready group for PARCC in math (2.81); this margin is equivalent to the difference between a «C +» and a «B -.&raqu
in the college - and - career ready group for PARCC
in math (2.81); this margin is equivalent to the difference between a «C +» and a «B -.&raqu
in math (2.81); this margin is equivalent to the
difference between a «C +» and a «B -.»
Finally,
in Kenya, where the raw test
scores showed students
in private and public schools performing at similar levels, the fact that private schools served a far more disadvantaged population resulted
in a gap of 0.1 standard deviations
in English and 0.2 standard deviations
in math (after accounting for
differences in student characteristics).
This rich dataset allows us to study students»
math and reading test -
score growth from year to year
in grades four through eight (where end of year and prior year tests are available), while also taking account of
differences in student backgrounds.
Only
in Dayton were there minor
differences in the pre-lottery test
scores: those offered a voucher
scored 6.5 percentile points lower
in math and 3.1 points lower
in reading than those not offered a scholarship, a statistically significant
difference.
The first paper, released
in July 2009 by Roland Fryer and Steven Levitt, found that while there are no mean
differences between boys and girls
in math when they start school, girls gradually lose ground, so that the gap between boys and girls after six years of schooling is half as large as the black - white test
score gap.
As statistical theory anticipates, the average
difference in the combined reading and
math test
scores of African - Americans
in all three cities remained exactly the same - 6.3 NPR points - after the adjustments for family background characteristics were introduced.
Regardless of initial
differences in test
score levels, all schools appear to help their students make similar improvements
in reading and
math over two years.
However, we found one important
difference between the two exams: PARCC's cutoff
scores for college - and career - readiness
in math are set at a higher level than the MCAS proficiency cutoff and are better aligned with what it takes to earn «B» grades
in college
math.
Scores on both tests, in both math and English language arts (ELA), are positively correlated with students» college outcomes, and the differences between the predictive validity of PARCC and MCAS scores are m
Scores on both tests,
in both
math and English language arts (ELA), are positively correlated with students» college outcomes, and the
differences between the predictive validity of PARCC and MCAS
scores are m
scores are modest.
Taking this
difference into account cuts the black - white test -
score gap to less than a fourth of a standard deviation
in math and completely eliminates the gap
in reading.
By 2000,
math scores were roughly 0.3 standard deviations higher than predicted, an improvement about one quarter the size of the
difference in math performance between Chicago students
in consecutive grades
in 1995.
By year four, there was no statistically significant
difference in math test
scores between students who remained
in private schools and the matched comparison group.
Our results from our analysis of
math scores in the fourth and fifth grades, available
in the paper, show generally similar patterns, with some
differences across grades.
55 % of BVP students
scored proficient
in ELA and 49.5 %
in math, compared to RI's averages of 37.9 %
in ELA and 29.6 %
in math — that is a double digit
difference in achievement
in both.
URBAN NAEP COVERAGE EdWeek: NAEP: Urban School Districts Improving Faster Than the Nation Baltimore Sun: Baltimore students
score near bottom
in reading,
math on key national assessment Cleveland Plain Dealer: Vast poverty
differences create unfair comparisons on Nation's Report Card Miami Herald: Miami and Florida students outperform peers on national test
Former University of Tennessee researcher William Sanders found students who
scored at about the same level on state
math tests
in third grade had
score differences of as much as 50 percentage points on sixth grade tests after having less qualified teachers.
On the 2016 Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) assessment, 52 % of BVP students
scored proficient
in ELA and 42 %
in math, compared to RI's averages of 39 % and 32 %, respectively — a double - digit
difference in achievement
in both.
There were no
differences in math test
scores among students whose parents had low
math anxiety, and no
differences in reading achievement for parents with different levels of
math anxiety.
On the 2016 Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) assessment, 52 % of BVP students
scored proficient
in ELA and 42 %
in math, compared to RI's averages of 39 % and 32 %, respectively — a double digit
difference in achievement
in both.
In the report, «Equations and Inequalities: Making Mathematics Accessible to All,» published on June 20, 2016, researchers looked at math instruction in 64 countries and regions around the world, and found that the difference between the math scores of 15 - year - old students who were the most exposed to pure math tasks and those who were least exposed was the equivalent of almost two years of educatio
In the report, «Equations and Inequalities: Making Mathematics Accessible to All,» published on June 20, 2016, researchers looked at
math instruction
in 64 countries and regions around the world, and found that the difference between the math scores of 15 - year - old students who were the most exposed to pure math tasks and those who were least exposed was the equivalent of almost two years of educatio
in 64 countries and regions around the world, and found that the
difference between the
math scores of 15 - year - old students who were the most exposed to pure
math tasks and those who were least exposed was the equivalent of almost two years of education.
«Think about a kid who
scores 249 versus a kid who
scores 250 — those kids are not different,» he said, «but a small
difference in scores determined who took two
math classes and who took one.»
There was no significant
difference, however,
in scores on the
math Regents.
After controlling for poverty and test
scores from previous years, the Responsive Classroom (RC) approach contributed to the gains
in both reading and
math, with a greater
difference between the intervention and control schools seen
in math.