I love that they highlight
the difference in sentencing guidelines between powder and crack cocaine.
The literature review discusses gender
differences in sentencing, and concludes that males receive harsher sentences than females.
Even minute
difference in sentence structure can harm the central idea of a piece of writing.
Violence in an offender's criminal history does not appear to account for any of the demographic
differences in sentencing.
* Why an analysis of the sentencing practices of judges in two courthouses no more than 60 miles apart reflects big
differences in sentence outcomes is a grave cause for concern.
The authors then ran a statistical analysis (once again using TRAC resources) to determine if there were
differences in sentence lengths between judges nominated by Republican Presidents and judges nominated by Democratic Presidents.
Not exact matches
20 people
in the same room can't pass a single
sentence around a room playing telephone and these nutjobs think that these stories somehow were accurately communicated with NO alteration for language
differences, or perception
differences for hundreds of years... I suppose they all thought EXACTLY alike...
A few simple
sentences explaining why the court
in Dresden was Catholic while Saxony was Lutheran (because
in 1697 the elector of Saxony, Friedrich August, opportunistically converted to Catholicism
in order to be elected king of Poland), the
differences between Calvinist and Lutheran realms, why Leipzig was a commercial center, and other such matters would have been helpful.
The
difference in times
in Mark 15:25 and John 19:14 are likely because Mark was recording time
in a Hebrew fashion (3rd hour from sunup = ~ 9 am) and John was recording the time of Pilates
sentence as Roman time (measured from midnight) 6th hour was 6 am with the crucifixion to follow 3 hours later.
With all these
differences it is hardly surprising that ministers
in the nonliturgical churches, when conducting communion services, often confuse and combine the different accounts and even insert
sentences or phrases not found
in any of them.
It may seem like nit - picking to you, but the word «exactly»
in the
sentence, «I can tell you that the God of Scripture is exactly as I described Him» really does make a
difference.
@Tesla, the
difference between Rush and Obama is Obama dabbled
in crack but has never said drug addicts belong
in prison with long
sentences.
In Part II of the essay, «The Negation of Sexual
Difference,» he lifts
sentences and paragraphs from a 2010 interview with Béatrice Bourges, president of the Collective for Children and an opponent of same - sex marriage and adoption.
See there is liter ally NO
difference between using the word «guy» and the word «girl»
in this
sentence EXCEPT for the fact that she is ACTUALLY a girl.
In one key study, researchers at Stanford University and the University of Texas at Austin found that a simple, one - sentence note of encouragement made a huge difference in academic outcomes for African - American students, who often have fraught power relationships with teacher
In one key study, researchers at Stanford University and the University of Texas at Austin found that a simple, one -
sentence note of encouragement made a huge
difference in academic outcomes for African - American students, who often have fraught power relationships with teacher
in academic outcomes for African - American students, who often have fraught power relationships with teachers.
You may have found yourself rereading the previous
sentence, wondering about the
difference in capitalization, maybe even concluding that I'm probably referring to being a Christian Scientist.
«For example, the
difference between a yes / no question and a simple declarative
sentence in ASL is indeed on the face (
in the eyebrows and the head tilt),» Tom Humphries, a deaf associate professor at the University of California, San Diego, and the author of many books about the deaf, wrote via e-mail.
Lum cautions that
in the real world, other factors besides
sentence duration likely contribute to
differences in incarceration rates.
With no
differences between the two hypothetical groups other than the length of the
sentence, even 3 extra months
in prison led to higher incarceration rates over time.
(I just deleted a paragraph before this one, only to add
in this
sentence to make up the
difference.)
emoticon can make a big
difference in the way you come across — exclamation marks, the odd word
in capital letters or ellipses at the end of a
sentence can all give your messages more personality.
One egotistical
sentence in your description could be the
difference of whether or not you seal down a date this weekend.
The
difference between the movie you just saw
in your head after you read that
sentence and what transpires onscreen, however, is huge, and the bulk of said
difference comes courtesy of the two young leads.
Lesson 2: Using «Near Doubles» Lesson 3: Pairs that make 10 when adding Lesson 4: Idea of
Difference Lesson 5: Words about Subtraction Lesson 6: Using addition and subtraction with shopping Lesson 7: Identifying Multiples Lesson 8: Making Rectangular Arrays Lesson 9: Multiplication
Sentences Lesson 10: The Multiplication Symbols Lesson 11: Number Properties Years ago I made a lot of interesting Maths PowerPoint lessons, and then left them for 10 years
in a draw.
, A short answer game) c. Labelling activities (Geography and countries, Dinner's ready, Spooky Halloween) d. Team games (Blockbuster, Slapping the board game, Boardgame, Puzzle, Spot the
differences, The dictionary race, Disappearing game, The first one who can name...) e. Drawing and settling down activities (Read and draw, Write and draw, Word search, From English to French, The hidden
sentences, Coloring activity, Pictionary, Back - to - back descriptions) f. Activities
in pairs (Battleships, Family tree, Matching up, Draw your family tree, Guessing games, Snakes and ladders, Noughts and crosses, Ping - pong, Filling - gap, Role - play, Classification) g. Engaging everyone (One question / one student, Who's my next victim, Mind map, Questions
in a hat, Survey, Fashion show, Let's debate, Counting game, Hot - air balloon, Find the mistakes, Post-it game, Dominos) h.
Differentiation: purple = lower ability blue = middle ability yellow = higher ability Resources prepare students for answering Q3 (language) and Q4 (comparison) and cover the following: - analysis of vocabulary - analysis of
sentence forms - analysis of language techniques - explore audience and purpose - study of model answers - exploring the effect of language - improving exam responses using mark schemes - explore perspective - understand the
difference between synthesis and comparison - form comparisons between texts - practice timed responses Regular assessments are included to assess students ability
in true or false and synthesis tasks.
Introduction to logic
in maths;
difference between a
sentence and a statement.
There's a bigger
difference in the way
sentences are constructed
in these two pieces.
The student may be confused about the
difference between mode and median or be struggling with what makes a good lead
sentence; whatever it is, students get a chance to let you know their bumps
in the road.
The photo on the right shows the
difference between the use of «is»
in a metaphorical and non-metaphorical
sentence.
MyThesis.Net are often used
in the same
sentence and for many people they mean the same thing, but there is quite a big
difference between them.
Observe the
difference between the Italian
sentence and the one
in English.
The main
difference between voice search and typed -
in search is the length of the query and the nature of the
sentence.
And this is coming from a guy who can't put words
in the right order, can't tell the
difference between «should» and «shouldn't», and can't split two unrelated
sentences into two separate lines?
But it stands out from the identikit crowd (try explaining the
difference between a PlayStation 4 and an Xbox One
in two
sentences), something wild and unexpected.
Remember, one of the big
differences between an accurate rumour and a wild guess tends to be summed up
in a single
sentence:
I don't understand Paul Birch to disagree with the interpretation as I stated it
in the last
sentence, but he objects to my calling such a small kinetic - energy
difference a temperature
difference.
I just saw an article today that mentioned
in one
sentence that NASA now seems to understand this albedo
difference (or at least has me convinced they have an inkling of it).
The problem is
in the
difference between constructive criticism («hey, I think X is a better way to describe process Y than what the IPCC said... I'm going to publish a paper saying so, and give talks about it, and maybe it X will be reflected
in the next IPCC report) to destructive criticism («hey, one
sentence in one chapter
in WGII was wrong about the melting of Himalayan glaciers.
And on your thread
in reply to my comment you called acid rain damage deniers crackpots, so there is a definitional
difference here for sure.Your last two
sentences are key, as I think it would be part of Judy's case that the community are really pretty terrible at that — to the point of being dogmatic, perhaps?
The only mention of RCS
in the Hantemirov's Thesis abstract is this
sentence: To remove the age trend, a method of regional curves (Briffa et al., 1992), was used as which maintains the
differences between the growth rate of trees that existed
in various climatic epochs, i.e., allows to detect long - term fluctuations
in wood increases, exceeding the lifetime of individual trees.
In Marcott's original email to me, he had referred to the above paragraph in the article, arguing that the above sentence (which stated that the difference between reconstruction versions was not robust constituted a statement that the reconstruction itself in the modern portion was not statistically robus
In Marcott's original email to me, he had referred to the above paragraph
in the article, arguing that the above sentence (which stated that the difference between reconstruction versions was not robust constituted a statement that the reconstruction itself in the modern portion was not statistically robus
in the article, arguing that the above
sentence (which stated that the
difference between reconstruction versions was not robust constituted a statement that the reconstruction itself
in the modern portion was not statistically robus
in the modern portion was not statistically robust.
She explores how this
difference might come into play
in the context of self - defense and hate crime
sentence enhancements.
The chief
difference is that
in the United States (which has a Common Law Structure) the judge usually does not decide the case, but interprets the law (Trier of Law) and with a few exceptions, will determine the
sentence once guilt is found.
Booker is careful to emphasize that unreasonableness review will play a central role
in advancing Congress's original aim
in enacting the SRA because it will «tend to iron out
sentencing differences».
Another
difference is apparent
in sentencing for these offences.
[74] Publicly accessible records of this Court demonstrate that the failure to implement and adhere to an objective protocol for the random assignment of judges has resulted
in significant discrepancies
in both the number of
sentencing panels on which some judges of the Court sit and a marked
difference in the number of
sentence appeals heard by certain justices of the Court as compared with their colleagues.
As Berman notes, from Madoff's perspective, there's little practical
difference between a 150 - year
sentence or a 25 - year
sentence because under either scenario, the 71 - year - old Madoff will die
in prison.
Like including only one space after
sentence - ending periods, I doubt using full justification
in a brief submitted to a judge who prefers left justification will make any
difference, but it can not hurt to follow the judge's justification preference.
Differences in views between whites and nonwhites are less pronounced on drug crime
sentencing guidelines compared with their views of the criminal justice system's handling of crime more generally.