Whether the government has struck the right balance between the freedom of the smoker and the welfare of the non-smoker is open to doubt as it seems difficult to justify
the difference in treatment between smokers detained at Rampton hospital and smokers detained in prison.
The judge concluded that
the difference in treatment between common - law spouses and married or civil union spouses is not discriminatory.
Presently, costs in class action cases are only awarded against the defendant; this proposed provision further accentuates
the difference in treatment between claimants and defendants.
The ECtHR ruled that
the difference in treatment between men and women as regards entitlement to widows» benefit, of which the applicant was a victim, was not based on any objective and reason able justification and, accordingly, there had been a violation of Art 14 of the Convention taken in conjunction with Art 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention.
The House of Lords also decided that
the difference in treatment between Mr Marper and S, and other innocent people who had not been arrested and required to give DNA samples, was not discriminatory under Art 14.
And then there is
the difference in treatment between the two types of taxis which gave rise to the Eventech case.
The starting point is PM v United Kingdom (App no 6638/03)[2005] ECHR 504; where it was held that, for Art 14 purposes «
a difference in treatment between persons in analogous or relevantly similar positions is discriminatory if it has no objective and reasonable justification».
The measure threatens to open up a stark
difference in treatment between US domestic banks and their foreign counterparts, largely because it captures payments made from their US entities to their non-US operations.
There can be
some differences in treatment between somebody who has multiple affairs and who is a sex addict from somebody who has multiple affairs say a serial cheater who has, doesn't really have an addictive profile is more a character problem opportunistic lacks alot of ability being pathic.
Biased comments relating to your age and distinct
differences in treatment between older and younger employees may be signs of age discrimination.
59 As several of the governments which have filed observations have pointed out, the opposite interpretation would lead to unjustifiable
differences in treatment between Member States, according to how their national social security systems are organised, given that the «special» nature of a benefit such as the one at issue in the main proceedings — and, as a consequence, the fact that it falls within the scope of Regulation No 883/2004 — depends, inter alia, on whether the grant of that benefit is based, under national law, on objective criteria or solely on the state of need of the person concerned.
Not exact matches
With this argument we have reached another central metaphysical
difference between Whiteheadian and Pannenbergian theism6 Pannenberg has rejected the Whiteheadian
treatment of God
in favor of a metaphysic that lays greater stress on consciousness.
The best
treatment of the
differences between Whitehead and Bergson of which I am aware is one that acknowledges the full weight of Bergson's influence, and then goes on to ask how and where these ideas were modified
in the philosophy of the organism.63 Hartshorne, the author of that article, eventually concludes that «synthetic psychical creativity» is Whitehead's most original insight; one not to be found
in Bergson.
The
difference between Selman and Seybold is seen most clearly
in their
treatments of the question of the immortality of the soul.
An important dividing line
in the debate is whether one sees a significant moral
difference between killing by euthanasia / PAS and allowing to die by withdrawing useless, cure - oriented, life - sustaining
treatment.
Pediatrician Jay Gordon, MD, explains the
differences between bacterial and viral pneumonia, including the
differences in the symptoms and
treatments between the two
In matters of truth and justice, there is no
difference between large and small problems, for issues concerning the
treatment of people are all the same.
The
difference between the two proposed conditions is only their causes, mechanism of action,
treatment options, and
in the level of evidence that they really exist.
The
difference in the average
treatment effect
in overall fetal loss and neonatal death across included trials
between women allocated to midwife - led continuity models of care and women allocated to other models has an average risk ratio (RR) of 0.84, with 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.71 to 0.99 (participants = 17561; studies = 13).
The
difference in the average
treatment effect
in all fetal loss before and after 24 weeks plus neonatal death across included trials
between women allocated to midwife - led continuity models of care and women allocated to other models has an average RR of 0.84, with 95 % CI 0.71 to 0.99.
The
difference in the average
treatment effect
in all fetal loss before and after 24 weeks plus neonatal death across included trials
between women allocated to midwife - led continuity models of care and women allocated to other models has an average risk ratio (RR) of 0.84, with 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.71 to 0.99 (participants = 17561; studies = 13).
Nor did we find any
difference in breastfeeding outcomes
between those
in the high - and low - frequency
treatment groups.
«There was no
difference in the number of contacts
between the high - and low - frequency
treatment groups for women with non-missing data on breastfeeding outcomes.
As reported by Reuters, Dr. William Copeland, a psychiatry researcher at Duke University
in Durham, North Carolina, USA, stated that: «This study is about righting a longstanding error and prejudice about the
differences between these common childhood adversities,» adding: «It suggests that whether we are talking about prevention, screening or
treatment, our notions of childhood mistreatment need to be broader and more holistic than they have been.
As these two phenomenons differ so greatly
in treatment, it is important to clearly understand the
difference between nightmares and night terrors.
The
difference in the average
treatment effect
in overall fetal loss and neonatal death across included trials
between women allocated to midwife - led continuity models of care and women allocated to other models has an average risk ratio (RR) of 0.84 and a 95 % confidence interval (CI) of 0.71 to 1.00 (12 trials, n = 15,869, RR 0.84, 95 % CI 0.71 to 1.00, random - effects).
It continued: «We uphold that there is a fundamental
difference between abortion, and necessary medical
treatments that are carried out to save the life of the mother, even if such
treatment results
in the loss of life of her unborn child.
Although the study was not designed to differentiate
between the exact types of services available
in each centre, the authors note that the main
difference in terms of
treatment was provision or not of methadone, suggesting it is likely to have played an important role
in the different rates of relapse.
While researchers did not find
differences in survival rates, they did find
differences in side effects
between the
treatment arms at this interim analysis.
«During our initial trial of the mini-Horhizotron, root dry mass of the herbaceous species tested and root length measurements showed little
difference in growth
between the substrate
treatments or
between the mini-Horhizotron and containers for the species tested at the end of the experiment,» the authors wrote.
Although PFS rates were comparable
between treatment groups,
differences emerged
in the rates of more serious side effects.
Some modest but statistically significant
differences emerged
between the accelerated and conventional
treatment arms
in shorter - term bowel and urinary side effects.
In addition, although statisticians detected a difference in pain relief between treatment and placebo, the effect may have been lost on patient
In addition, although statisticians detected a
difference in pain relief between treatment and placebo, the effect may have been lost on patient
in pain relief
between treatment and placebo, the effect may have been lost on patients.
Furthermore, there are no
differences between the major political party affiliation groups on views about the use of animals
in research, the safety of eating genetically modified (GM) foods and whether to allow access to experimental drug
treatments before those
treatments have been shown to be safe and effective.
There was no significant increase
in adverse events with any of the
treatments over the control group, nor was there any
difference in malaria incidence
between groups during the one year period after the study
treatment was stopped, suggesting that monthly administration of DP is a safe and effective
treatment for reducing malaria among infants
in regions with year - round transmission and high resistance to antifolates.
At week 54, BASDAI improved significantly from baseline
in both
treatment groups (CT - P13: from 6.74 to 3.78 and INX: from 6.57 to 3.70) and this improvement was similar
between groups (
difference of means -0.29; CI of the
difference -0.91 to 0.32).
«
In all three of these measures of
treatment outcome we found significant
differences between before - and after the switch to biological
treatment, both at 3 - 5 months after the switch and also sustained over the entire observed timespan,» says Marcus Schmitt - Egenolf.
With regard to survival time, the
differences between the two
treatment groups were not statistically significant
in favour of ruxolitinib
in all of the four analysis dates.
Regarding the occurrence of leukemia (leukemic transformation), a typical late complication, there were no
differences between the two
treatment groups
in the study.
For the subsequent three years, there was no longer a significant
difference between the two groups
in the number of patients who required surgical
treatment for an SCC.
There were also no significant
differences between treatment groups
in changes
in 6 - minute walk distance.
The important
differences in treatment duration
between intervention and control arm, which could be up to 36 weeks, partly made it impossible to interpret
differences in side effects.
The authors write that one explanation for lack of statistically significant
differences between the
treatment groups
in all - type cancer incidence is that the study group had higher baseline vitamin D (serum 25 - hydroxyvitamin D) levels compared with the U.S. population.
The review included data from 17 studies on various aspects of problem gambling published
between 2002 and 2015 — ranging from evaluating
treatment effectiveness, to GA / / culture characteristics and
differences in gender experiences.
«It's important for us to understand
differences in disease risk, symptoms, and responses to
treatments between sexes,» says senior author Carey N. Lumeng, M.D., Ph.D, associate professor
in pediatrics and physiology at the Medical School and a pediatric pulmonologist at U-M's C.S. Mott Children's Hospital.
There was no significant
difference in functional independence at 3 months
between the
treatment groups.
Our results also show that there are fundamental
differences in the dopamine system
between adolescents and adults, which we need to take into account
in future
treatments,» explains Pezawas.
«As we develop drugs that work by targeting the primary brain pathology
in schizophrenia, it is likely that the
differences between patients are going to play a bigger role
in determining optimal
treatment,» commented Dr. John Krystal, Editor of Biological Psychiatry.
There was no significant
difference in costs
between DBT and DM episodes within the diagnosis or cancer
treatment windows.
The sensory panels indicated that physicochemical
differences were not noticeable to tasters;
in fact, the tasters on the testing panels could not discern
between tomatoes from different supplemental lighting
treatments or those from the unsupplemented controls.