Sentences with phrase «difference of perspective»

One key difference of perspective between the Congress and the Army was regarding the Army itself.

At this point, I think it's a perfectly understandable difference of perspective,» the mayor said.

It's a difference of perspective.

This difference is due to differences of perspectives, differences that go beyond those between modern scientific perspectives and pre-scientific ones, although it includes these.

When studying or teaching Hinduism or Buddhism, the Westerner soon becomes aware of the rather wide differences of perspective and meaning between the Judeo - Christian and the Hindu - Buddhist ways of viewing the nature of man and man's relation to his world.

What the authors cited above are describing is differences of perspective and experience within one basic paradigm.

Simply adding social diversity to a group makes people believe that differences of perspective might exist among them and that belief makes people change their behavior.

It's possible, of course, to see the origins of the fault lines in these early reports as a product of the differences of the perspectives of the people who were on the two committees.

By restructuring and refocusing toxic communication patterns, and by learning the importance of maintaining loving connection even during periods of disagreement, hostile communication can be minimized, and differences of perspective can even become a springboard for even greater appreciation and respect for oneanother.

Not exact matches

Highlighting that there are many categories of differences in the workplace and the value of having many perspectives creates more robust discussions and more effective implementations.

That difference in perspective can be molded by the kind of praise we receive, and that often starts when we're kids.

Difference makers are the ones who ask the right questions, see the whole picture, and go outside of their networks to gather ideas from a variety of perspectives.

Native New Yorkers tend to have a preference for their own neighborhoods over others, which makes it difficult for them to see the merits of other areas - so having an outsider's perspective made all the difference.

«Any difference between the two of them in terms of perspective, strategy [and] approach will inevitably cascade down to their respective organizations.

Grasping what's truly behind his perspective of embracing failure can make a difference in how we live our lives - not just run our businesses.

«Some of the people who get involved in financial advising come at it from a humanistic perspective — they want to make a difference — and some are awesome at math.

But there's a noticeable difference in the value systems, principles, and perspectives of transportation engineers.

It's the individual differences and the wealth of perspectives brought by a diverse workforce that enables us to deliver excellent results and client service.

At Franklin Templeton, we embrace individual differences and the wealth of perspectives brought by global diversity.

The Arthur Rock Center for Entrepreneurship supports Harvard Business School's mission to «educate leaders who make a difference in the world» by infusing this leadership perspective with an entrepreneurial point of view.

Such a gating function remains (from the USPTO's perspective) unavailable to the other exceptions based on its current guidance memoranda even though many claims in technology - focused patent applications encompass functional differences relative to the state of the art.

From the perspective of the user, the only difference between the term sheet generator and a document - assembly questionnaire for drafting a contract is the number of questions that you're asked.

We have a ton of small side hustles going right now and they are making a huge difference in our financial perspective.

That being said, I like to discuss differences and see if there is something to gain from another's perspective and if they wish, to receive some of my perspective as well.

Most of us think some difference is good, that a variety of perspectives makes life more interesting.

However it does seem to me that there is a difference in how we should treat behavioral differences which are destructive and doctrinal differences that are matter of opinion or perspective.

So while there are differences in the Four Gospels, they are not contradictions or errors, but are the normal differences one would expect when comparing different eye - witness accounts of the same event form different perspectives.

And once we understand the perspectives, goals, and focus of each gospel writer, we can better understand how to reconcile the differences between each Gospel.

I think that our differences here are largely those of emphasis and of perspective.

Because of all the differences in people from their perspectives of environment and the differences in abilities and talents such as artistic and philosophical perspectives, it is only natural that they would seek to worship god in different ways in different churches or at home by themselves.

If, on the other hand, there is some common court of appeal or superior criterion, then the continuing dialogue about their difference can hold some promise of change which may be called «education,» «repentance,» reconcihation,» or «training,» depending on the perspective in which we want to look at it.

What to make then of Marsden's argument (or, alternatively, the neo-Thomist argument) that a Christian perspective should make a difference in scholarly results?

In order to illustrate the difference between a third - person and a first - person perspective, imagine swimming the length of a pool.

The difference here of course has nothing to do with trustung what «men» have written, it has to do with faith in whatever diety you believe... If you accept that there is a diety responsible for inspiring someone to write about them then really it is not the person writing but the diety writing through them... so your argument from that perspective is moot...

With both groups, of course, we share a great deal in common — perspectives and practices more important than the differences I have listed.

I fail to see the difference between any of them (from a real vs. made - up perspective).

A more amusing account of the differences, written from a perspective more sympathetic to Russell, highlights the sense in which mainstream Anglo - American analytic thought has tended to ignore or downplay Whitehead.

«Rather than producing a systematic definition of «vocation,» we decided to draw upon our diverse perspectives in a way that did not smooth out the differences among them.»

I agree with what you have written from the biblical perspective and would like to take it further in the sense that that we are all sinners whether fornicators liars homosexuals the difference is that if we decide to follow Jesus we not only repent of our sin but we turn away from continuing to sin Remenber the woman caught in adultery Jesus said go and sin no more that applys to all of us that have accepted Jesus.But unless we die to our desires we cant live for him.brentnz

Our sense of perspective must include this understanding that the difference between degrees of imperfection can be crucially important.

Deliberately listening to and considering the perspectives of LGBT people can make a huge difference in how we engage conversations around marriage, the Bible, and church.

Mutual openness, the removal of dividing differences of faith and order, and the reconciliation of memories presuppose changes of perspective and attitude.

From a phenomenological perspective D would identify three general differences: (a) the scope and status of the principle of functional ultimacy; (b) a different concept of soteriology that derives from (c) a dissimilar view about the benevolent character of ultimate reality.

Ford then tried to develop a perspective on these differences, and found himself on most points of divergence increasingly drawn to Whitehead's original perspective, rather than to Hartshorne's modifications.

It seems to me that in our different perspectives the best that can be achieved is a mutual respect for where both of us are coming from and a peaceful coexistence with our differences.

Now, one could argue all day, from a strictly civic perspective, about whether a person should be allowed to deny services to another person on account of religious differences.

There is a profound difference between thinking about faith from a perspective that is informed by an overview of history and thinking in and from the faith itself.

Much more in the way of application is needed, something Jones himself recognizes when he states in his introduction that «I do not display here the substantive difference a Trinitarian perspective brings to various issues and often vexing problems.»

Premier among those absent but felt perspectives will be that of postmodern thinkers who question whether either thought or experience can provide us with some common «foundation» in terms of which our ideas can be constructed and our differences adjudicated.

While the report is obviously aware of this issue and avoids directly falling into this trap, at the same time, it can sometimes appear that the emphasis is on the difference between pre - and post Vatican II perspectives.