According to Merriam Webster, the definition of compromise is the «settlement of
differences by arbitration or by consent reached by mutual concessions.»
Not exact matches
Article 2 (c) of the 1927 Geneva Convention states: «Even if the conditions laid down in Article 1 hereof are fulfilled, recognition and enforcement of the award shall be refused if the Court is satisfied: -LSB-...](c) That the award does not deal with the
differences contemplated
by or falling within the terms of the submission to
arbitration or that it contains decisions on matters beyond the scope of the submission to
arbitration.»
The drafters of the New York Convention further built on the 1927 Geneva Convention
by explicitly allowing for severability of the part of the award dealing with a
difference not contemplated
by or not falling within the terms of the submission to
arbitration, or containing decisions on matters beyond the scope of the submission to
arbitration, in order to permit recognition and enforcement of the part of the award containing decisions on matters submitted to
arbitration.
49 (1) Despite the
arbitration provision in a collective agreement or deemed to be included in a collective agreement under section 48, a party to a collective agreement may request the Minister to refer to a single arbitrator, to be appointed
by the Minister, any
difference between the parties to the collective agreement arising from the interpretation, application, administration or alleged violation of the agreement, including any question as to whether a matter is arbitrable.
277.41 A collective agreement between a board and a designated bargaining agent for a teachers» bargaining unit may provide for the final and binding settlement
by arbitration, without stoppage of work, of all
differences between the parties arising from the interpretation, application, administration or alleged violation of this Part or any regulation, guideline, rule or policy under it, including any question as to whether a matter is arbitrable.
The Court seems to allow a ban on strikes if there is another way to resolve
differences, notably
by arbitration.
- Political
differences have always existed in parallel with respect for basic principles to safeguard access to justice in international relations, as represented
by international
arbitration, Annette Magnusson said at the event.
The primary
difference between
arbitration and mediation is that the opinion provided
by the third - party is, in some cases, legally binding.
However, even in cases where the spouses do not intend to proceed to court (i.e. where they hope to resolve their
differences by way of mediation or
arbitration), it may be prudent for each of them to complete a Financial Statement, nonetheless.
Here are some highlights on the predictions offered
by the panelists: 1) class actions are not going away; 2) the continued growth of mass commerce will continue to spawn class action litigation; 3) Justice Scalia's death will have a significant impact on class action jurisprudence going forward and the judiciary is likely to get less friendly to defendants in the short - term; 4) technology will make a big
difference for the better in managing class action litigation; 5) defendants will continue to come up with creative, far - reaching ways of limiting class actions; 6) plaintiffs» attorneys will continue to bring class actions when a) they think they can make money and / or b) they think they will advance the public good; 7) there will be some good class actions and some horrible ones; 8) look out for states to pass new consumer protection laws similar to the New Jersey New Jersey Truth - in - Consumer Contract, Warranty and Notice Act (TCCWNA); 9) the TCPA and all - natural litigation booms will continue in the near future; 10) The CFPB will broadly define consumer finance services; 11) more class actions will go to trial; 12) what happens with the enforceability of
arbitration clauses will have a big impact on the viability of many categories of class actions in the future; 13) look for more class actions in the federal courts in New York state.
For any dispute or
difference shall arise as to the quantum to be paid under Policy (liability being otherwise admitted) such
difference shall independently of all other questions be referred to the decision of a sole arbitrator to be appointed in writing
by the parties to or if they can not agree upon a single arbitrator within 30 days of any part invoking
arbitration, the same shall be referred to a panel of three arbitrator, comprising of two arbitrator, one to be appointed
by each of the parties to the dispute /
difference and the third arbitrator to be appointed
by such two arbitrators and
arbitration shall be conducted under and in accordance with the provision of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
An agent should invoke friendly
arbitrations by the real estate board, rather than action through the courts of law, in settling
differences between himself and other agents.