Sentences with phrase «differences in interpretation of»

The divergence in the Mann / Lamb graphs (Figure 16) at this point is due to the considerable differences in the interpretation of the extent and warmth and extent of the MWP (outside our period of study) and the cold and extent of the LIA.

They appear to be related to differences in interpretation of INDCs, assumptions about other countries, level of disaggregation for small countries, choice of global warming potentials to compute carbon dioxide equivalent emissions, treatment of emissions related to land use, and treatment of international aviation and maritime shipping.

However, as many of you pointed out, even within Calvinism there are differences in the interpretation of «election.»

For constructive dialog to happen, Christians must stop conflating differences in interpretation of Scripture with differences in commitment to Scripture.

In the Middle Ages, the slogan was adduced in order to acknowledge that one may speak of a consensus among early Christian writers (consensus patrum) even if these authors displayed some differences in their interpretations of the Scriptures.

I don't see this as doing «whatever you please,» but rather as a difference in interpretation of the TOS.

Now it is the difference in the interpretation of the operation of «it's the physics» in the real world that has everyone's panties in a wad.

This post will consider the difference in the interpretation of «genuine and determining occupational requirements».

Not exact matches

Interpretation of data on imports is complicated by differences in the seasonal adjustments calculated on a monthly and quarterly basis.

Although interpretation of earnings data remains difficult, due to methodological differences in the construction of the various measures (for details see Box A, Statement on Monetary Policy, February 2002), the rebound is evident in both national accounts and financial reporting - based estimates.

It is almost always a difference of interpretation, which leads to a difference in beliefs.

I hope that the distinctions to which I have pointed help the reader to see why that would be a mistake, and why we need a framework for sorting out these finer - grained but essential differences in the operations of knowing and valuing underlying persons» selfhood, membership, interpretations, and motivations.

When proper principles of interpretation are applied, and differences in theology exist, at least any differences can be talked about.

For all our differences and ongoing arguments, to be an evangelical means we live in this tradition of interpretation.

In fact, over two thousand years of biblical interpretation, the Christian religion has proved to be ridiculously flexible, able to tolerate significant theological and practical differences without, you know, us having to say «farewell» to people who land on a different interpretation.»

There are minor differences from country to country in the manner of praying, differences of no importance which have grown up through varying interpretations in the schools of jurisprudence.

The differences are only in the interpretations, as mentioned above, and these differences result primarily from the differences in standards of education.

Interestingly enough, the Sartrian notion of man's pour - soi or projective self, as distinguished from his sheer given - ness as en - soi, has a considerable similarity to the general process - idea which we are expounding, whatever may be the differences between the two in statement and interpretation.

I generally accept differences in biblical interpretation with a shrug of my shoulders.

For that reason, I borrowed, though with a difference of interpretation that made it clear that I was not borrowing the well - known tenets of Platonism along with it, the Platonic phrase «real (Or true) cause» to refer to the agent in his exercise of supervening ontic power.

The main difference is Obama doesn't lead state - wide prayer meetings and talk about his biblical interpretations of the bible... like Bachmann's belief in submitting to her husband.

Once more, differences in historic definitions of the ministry are less due to exclusive insistence on some one interpretation of what constitutes a call than to variations in the emphasis placed on the various elements present in every call.

The differences, therefore, which produced first a rift and then an irreconcilable opposition between Jesus and the dominant school of Jewish teachers in his time were not in the end (though they might appear at first sight to be) a matter of divergent interpretations of this or that point in the Law.

The differences between the legalists and the Sufis were apparent in their interpretations of the meaning of religious law and the ways in which it should be derived and justified.

While debate over the understanding of Biblical interpretation lies at the heart of current evangelical discussions concerning women, differences in theological tradition lie at the center of discussions over social ethics, and disagreement over one's approach toward the wider secular culture is surfacing as the focus of controversy regarding homosexuality.

If the latter is the case, and I think it is, then it may be possible to reconcile many of the differences between the two thinkers with some creative interpretation, such that, whether they realized it themselves, Whitehead and Bergson were profoundly similar in basic philosophical outlook.

We have visited this territory already in discussing Whitehead's early interpretation of Bergson's view of the intellect, which turns out to be not a difference of doctrine, but a misunderstanding on Whitehead's part of Bergson's view.

The difference stems from Augustine's interpretation of a Latin translation of Romans 5:12 to mean that through Adam all men sinned, whereas the Orthodox reading in Greek interpret it as meaning that all of humanity sins as part of the inheritance of flawed nature from Adam.

It's hard to maintain unity when differences in theology are met with accusations of heresy, and challenges to certain interpretations of the Bible are dismissed as challenges to its authority.

What Bultmann means is that the difference between the mythological language of the New Testament and ecclesiastical dogma on the one hand and his own interpretation on the other is that the former presents us with a «miraculous, supernatural event», whereas the right interpretation is one which suggests «an historical event wrought out in time and space».

Even when one's faith is grounded in the Bible, latitude must be left for differences of interpretation.

Techniques involved in communicating the spirit of acceptance may vary, and there are differences of judgment as to the part which explicit interpretation by the counselor to the client ought to play.

This interpretation also allows us to see that the difference between God's function in providing novelty and that of past occasions, although great, need not be total.

The promise of faith is the conviction that in its formation, interpretation, and reception the text is a word of life that makes a difference.

Thus, although it should be easier to teach Western students about Islam than about Hinduism or Buddhism, for there is much in common, the burden of our neighborhood quarrels — not always impartially recorded — and the subtle differences of interpretation make Islam the most difficult religion to present fairly.

The purpose of this note is to illustrate, in a brief fashion, the difference between Ford's presentation of Whitehead's metaphysics and its traditional interpretations.

Whitehead offers an alternative formulation and claims on behalf of his formulation that it can account for all experimental results accounted for by the Einsteinian formulation but that it represents a different interpretation of these results in terms of a more adequate concept of nature (PNK vi; CN vii, 182; IS 125 - 35).18 The major theoretical difference between the two formulations is that whereas in the Einsteinian formulation the metric structure of the space - time continuum is variable from point to point and in differing directions (that is, heterogeneous and nonisotropic), in the Whiteheadian formulation the metric structure of the space - time continuum is uniform from point to point and in differing directions (that is, homogeneous and isotropic).

Interpretations like those of William Christian, Ivor Leclerc and even Charles Hartshorne (to name but a few) go in that direction; notwithstanding all their differences, they all tend to limit creativity to the level of concrescence.

And in any interpretation of Old Testament history compiled from a plurality of sources, it is important to recognize the essential unity commonly underlying differences in representation of both detail and point of view.

With all the difficulties of the interpretation of the vision before it was fulfilled in the event, the important fact for us is that Israel was at once a messianic Faith for the whole earth, and that secondly it is Messianism with an all - important difference from the accompaniment of the messianic religion.

The difference with the interpretation of William Christian is much less fundamental, and lies mainly in the manner of argumentation.

More likely than not, however, the slight differences we find between Luke and Paul in their accounts of the same events are due to ignorance on Luke's part, his lack of knowledge of the intricacies of Jewish law and custom, and his failure to comprehend nuances in Paul's theological interpretations.

This difference could be explained by a potential bias in the design, analysis, or interpretation of the results obtained in the SRs, depending on whether the authors reported having any financial conflict of interest or not.

The identification and interpretation of differences in the transcriptomes of organically and conventionally grown potato tubers

'» In addition to the disputable Biblical interpretations of the «rod» verses and the misuse of the word «obey» in translating from the original language of the Bible, there is a fundamental difference in philosophies revealed herIn addition to the disputable Biblical interpretations of the «rod» verses and the misuse of the word «obey» in translating from the original language of the Bible, there is a fundamental difference in philosophies revealed herin translating from the original language of the Bible, there is a fundamental difference in philosophies revealed herin philosophies revealed here.

This supports the interpretation that use of the materials resulted in the observed difference.

The interpretation, description and global criteria for Step four in Revised BFHI Guidelines almost matches the process of «Breast Crawl» with some subtle differences which are tabulated below:

The homogenous end of the spectrum includes Greece, Japan, Poland and Nigeria, confounding a geographic interpretation of the cultural differences in emotional displays.

It does not include honest error or honest differences in interpretations or judgments of data.

Dr. Harrison was given the award for his published article titled, «Clinical laboratories collaborate to resolve differences in variant interpretations submitted to ClinVar,» which was published in the March 2017 issue of Genetics in Medicine.