Sentences with phrase «differences in risk when»

Research has not shown differences in risk when the following factors were considered:

Not exact matches

Differences in firms» preparedness may reflect differences in the level of effort required to achieve compliance, differences in the availability of resources to undertake such efforts, differences in expectations about whether, how and when the Fiduciary Rule and PTEs might be revised, differences in perceptions of and appetite for compliance and / or market risk, or some combination of theDifferences in firms» preparedness may reflect differences in the level of effort required to achieve compliance, differences in the availability of resources to undertake such efforts, differences in expectations about whether, how and when the Fiduciary Rule and PTEs might be revised, differences in perceptions of and appetite for compliance and / or market risk, or some combination of thedifferences in the level of effort required to achieve compliance, differences in the availability of resources to undertake such efforts, differences in expectations about whether, how and when the Fiduciary Rule and PTEs might be revised, differences in perceptions of and appetite for compliance and / or market risk, or some combination of thedifferences in the availability of resources to undertake such efforts, differences in expectations about whether, how and when the Fiduciary Rule and PTEs might be revised, differences in perceptions of and appetite for compliance and / or market risk, or some combination of thedifferences in expectations about whether, how and when the Fiduciary Rule and PTEs might be revised, differences in perceptions of and appetite for compliance and / or market risk, or some combination of thedifferences in perceptions of and appetite for compliance and / or market risk, or some combination of these factors.

It's more accurate to say that each week we have a small, statistically insignificant and wholly unreliable forecast for the coming week's market direction, but that when grouped over a large number of instances, the differences in the average return / risk profile of different Market Climates are highly statistically significant.

Many use Christianity to rationalize that they're making a difference in the world when in reality they're just safely — and comfortably — immersing themselves within their own religious activities without taking any real risks or making any real sacrifices.

However, other studies have found no difference in risk associated with moderate versus high levels of protein intake, and even when differences have been found, they have not turned out to be statistically significant.

Flint and colleagues suggested that when midwives get to know the women for whom they provide care, interventions are minimised.22 The Albany midwifery practice, with an unselected population, has a rate for normal vaginal births of 77 %, with 35 % of women having a home birth.23 A review of care for women at low risk of complications has shown that continuity of midwifery care is generally associated with lower intervention rates than standard maternity care.24 Variation in normal birth rates between services (62 % -80 %), however, seems to be greater than outcome differences between «high continuity» and «traditional care» groups at the same unit.25 26 27 Use of epidural analgesia, for example, varies widely between Queen Charlotte's Hospital, London, and the North Staffordshire NHS Trust.

When it comes to breastfeeding, the tiniest of changes in the odds ratio or relative risk will excite them, even if the absolute difference is very very small.

For the baby, instrumental delivery can increase the short - term risks of bruising, facial injury, displacement of the skull bones, and cephalohematoma (blood clot under the scalp).24 The risk of intracranial hemorrhage (bleeding inside the brain) was increased in one study by more than four times for babies born by forceps compared to spontaneous birth, 25 although two studies showed no detectable developmental differences for forceps - born children at five years old.26, 27 Another study showed that when women with an epidural had a forceps delivery, the force used by the clinician to deliver the baby was almost twice the force used when an epidural was not in place.28

Some dental malocclusions have been found more commonly among pacifier users than nonusers, but the differences generally disappeared after pacifier cessation.284 In its policy statement on oral habits, the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry states that nonnutritive sucking behaviors (ie, fingers or pacifiers) are considered normal for infants and young children and that, in general, sucking habits in children to the age of 3 years are unlikely to cause any long - term problems.285 There is an approximate 1.2 - to 2-fold increased risk of otitis media associated with pacifier use, particularly between 2 and 3 years of age.286, 287 The incidence of otitis media is generally lower in the first year of life, especially the first 6 months, when the risk of SIDS is the highest.288, — , 293 However, pacifier use, once established, may persist beyond 6 months, thus increasing the risk of otitis mediIn its policy statement on oral habits, the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry states that nonnutritive sucking behaviors (ie, fingers or pacifiers) are considered normal for infants and young children and that, in general, sucking habits in children to the age of 3 years are unlikely to cause any long - term problems.285 There is an approximate 1.2 - to 2-fold increased risk of otitis media associated with pacifier use, particularly between 2 and 3 years of age.286, 287 The incidence of otitis media is generally lower in the first year of life, especially the first 6 months, when the risk of SIDS is the highest.288, — , 293 However, pacifier use, once established, may persist beyond 6 months, thus increasing the risk of otitis mediin general, sucking habits in children to the age of 3 years are unlikely to cause any long - term problems.285 There is an approximate 1.2 - to 2-fold increased risk of otitis media associated with pacifier use, particularly between 2 and 3 years of age.286, 287 The incidence of otitis media is generally lower in the first year of life, especially the first 6 months, when the risk of SIDS is the highest.288, — , 293 However, pacifier use, once established, may persist beyond 6 months, thus increasing the risk of otitis mediin children to the age of 3 years are unlikely to cause any long - term problems.285 There is an approximate 1.2 - to 2-fold increased risk of otitis media associated with pacifier use, particularly between 2 and 3 years of age.286, 287 The incidence of otitis media is generally lower in the first year of life, especially the first 6 months, when the risk of SIDS is the highest.288, — , 293 However, pacifier use, once established, may persist beyond 6 months, thus increasing the risk of otitis mediin the first year of life, especially the first 6 months, when the risk of SIDS is the highest.288, — , 293 However, pacifier use, once established, may persist beyond 6 months, thus increasing the risk of otitis media.

And when evaluating the risks it is also important to bear in mind some important differences between the UK and the US.

To highlight the differences in how men and women approach their financial commitments, research conducted last year by the Barclays Wealth Female Client Group showed that wealthy women, across the world, were less risk averse than men when it came to their investments.

The authors suggest that the differences in reasoning about risks could be important factors to consider when designing online training and education for both preventative and protective measures.

«Our findings are crucial in that they help identify potential brain biomarkers that, when taken into context with behavioral differences, may help identify which adolescents are at risk for dangerous and pathological behaviors in the future,» Dewitt explained.

«The higher risk of tumor recurrence that we observed among African American women was reduced when controlling for those factors, suggesting that these genomic differences contribute, at least partly, to the known racial disparity in the survival of African American and Caucasian breast cancer patients.»

«That's definitely true, but the years transitioning to menopause may represent a «teachable moment,» when patients are especially receptive to learning and putting into practice healthy habits that can make a difference in their cardiovascular disease risk.»

Although differences in the environments in which people live often are suspected when asthma risks among populations differ, the new findings illustrate the importance of also considering genetic differences among ethnic groups in diagnosing and treating disease, said Esteban Burchard, MD, professor of bioengineering for the UCSF School of Pharmacy and the senior scientist for the study.

You may make a significant difference in your overall health and reduce your risk of dementia or Alzheimer's disease when you purposefully include the foods your brain needs to function and detoxify.

There is probably little or no difference in weight loss and changes in cardiovascular risk factors up to two years of follow - up when overweight and obese adults, with or without type 2 diabetes, are randomised to low CHO diets and isoenergetic balanced weight loss diets.»

However, other studies have found no difference in risk associated with moderate versus high levels of protein intake, and even when differences have been found, they have not turned out to be statistically significant.

When I am looking for FREE Dating in Western Australia for men Brisbane Male Escorts numbers don't remember padding downstairs barefoot to find for private girls in Sex Work (Fees) RIS, and the risk of the difference between and anytime.

As Rod Bristow from Pearson says: «teachers want to make a difference for our children; when they feel they can't for whatever reason, we risk losing them from the profession» — so it's our job as leaders to make sure the right support is in place and that we are empowering staff to deliver.

Grade retention that results from narrow measures of academic preparedness can increase student risk for problems in school, including increased drop - out rates, and even when the student is promoted, the use of such assessments to sort students creates tracks within grade levels that reflect racial, ethnic, and social - class differences and that function to direct entire categories of students toward low - wage jobs or incarceration.

We take these differences into account when assessing risk in the sector.

In our analysis, quarterly yield differences (after MER) and maturity differences between XSB and XBB were examined to determine when a switch from one to the other would have made sense (i.e. would have given us an additional 0.15 % of annual expected yield for each additional year of term risk).

When there is little difference in risk premia (expected return) between cash and risk assets (equities), risk assets becomes drastically more risky.

The authors also acknowledge the limitations of their conclusions given problems arising from differences in market risk and the possibility of selection bias, a common problem also found when examining the performance of hedge funds.

The risk of one of the dogs getting killed increases when there is a big difference in their sizes, but dogs of the same size also kill.

For Carbon Storage, 10 % Forest Cover ≠ Forest Certainly a good thing: Creating ways to help farmers financially benefit by preserving forests on their lands is a vital part of combatting climate change — but (at the risk of being too snarky) I can't help but thinking that the differences in carbon storage of a particular area of land when it's an actual forest and when it's only got 10 % of its original tree cover is pretty significant.

As Brown reviews, nuclear power is far less of a risk to public health than coal generation, and this difference is magnified when factoring in the health impacts of climate change.

a sweeping assumption that the different life expectancies of male and female insured persons, the difference in their propensity to take risks when driving and the difference in their inclination to utilise medical services — which merely come to light statistically — are essentially due to their sex.

The results of the current study with regards to gender differences in adolescent DSH / SA are consistent with previous findings, in that adolescent girls showed a higher prevalence of DSH5 28 and SA.7 29 30 With respect to the personality characteristics, low self - esteem has been associated with both DSH4 and SA.29 Cross-sectional surveys of adolescents have consistently found that depression is strongly correlated with DSH4 5 and SA.29 30 Tobacco smoking has also been previously identified to be a risk factor for DSH5 31 and SA, 32 33 along with alcohol use for DSH5 28 31 and SA.32 33 When we analysed the data according to gender, we found that tobacco smoking and alcohol use were especially important risk factors for DSH / SA in girls (tables 2 and 3).

ARI (absolute risk increase): the absolute difference in rates of bad events, when the experimental treatment harms more patients than the control treatment, and calculated as EER − CER .

When these two area categories were combined, the risk of a poor relationship was 20 %, compared to 14 % in other areas (urban or accessible): this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05).

It's really important when you're doing a risk assessment to keep in mind and note differences between dynamic and static risk factors.

However, when they controlled for comorbid attention problems, they found that the difference in injury risk between the two groups all but disappeared, indicating to the researchers that attention problems, in children with or without autism, may be the real factor behind the increased injury risk seen in previous studies.

Several longitudinal studies have indicated that returning to full - time work after a brief maternity leave was a risk factor that compromised maternal mental health (depression and anxiety), especially when shorter leaves coincided with maternal fatigue, poor general health, poor social support, marital concerns, and other risk factors.17, 18 When mothers in the Wisconsin Maternity Leave and Health Study were contacted one year after they had given birth, no significant differences were noted between home - makers, part - time, and full - time employed women in measures of mental health such as depression, anxiety and self - estwhen shorter leaves coincided with maternal fatigue, poor general health, poor social support, marital concerns, and other risk factors.17, 18 When mothers in the Wisconsin Maternity Leave and Health Study were contacted one year after they had given birth, no significant differences were noted between home - makers, part - time, and full - time employed women in measures of mental health such as depression, anxiety and self - estWhen mothers in the Wisconsin Maternity Leave and Health Study were contacted one year after they had given birth, no significant differences were noted between home - makers, part - time, and full - time employed women in measures of mental health such as depression, anxiety and self - esteem.

There were no differences in putative risk factors between child - and young adult - onset depression when the recency of risk was taken into account.

When a similar model was tested within each ethnic group to compare youths residing in high - risk and low - risk neighborhoods, few neighborhood differences were found.

This difference suggests the possibility that an absent worker - father in Korean families may really increase the risk of their children's delinquency, especially when the mother is not self - directed.