No significant
differences in school performance were found, with both groups having generally low grades.
«Assessing the oppositional culture explanation for racial / ethnic
differences in school performance.»
In 2016, a study concluded that 1/5 of black - white
differences in school performance can be attributed to school suspensions (Perry & Morris 2016).
The differences in school performance levels were pronounced in many cases: The difference in performance between a closed and newly assigned school's policy points — the district's school accountability policy — was 21 percentage points, on average.
Public and policymaker awareness of
the differences in school performance made evident by TVAAS came to public attention as schools were ranked and the top performers honored by the Education Consumers Foundation beginning in 2005.
Assessing the Oppositional Culture Explanation for Racial / Ethnic
Differences in School Performance.
does not account for
differences in school performance beyond test scores and graduation rates.»
What do
these differences in school performance mean in layman's terms?
Recently, Chicago's two major newspapers made it very clear that charter schools can be very problematic and do not provide better academic results to justify additional millions of dollars that could be directed towards struggling neighborhood public schools («Chicago's Noble charter school network has tough discipline policy; critics say too many students are being expelled,» Chicago Tribune, 4/7/14; «Charter schools show little
difference in school performance,» Chicago Sun - Times, 4/7/14).
Not exact matches
«What they find is that any
difference in performance can be explained by other factors, and that faith
schools aren't just religiously selective, they are socio - economically selective as well.
Along the way, certainly, those efforts have produced individual successes —
schools and programs that make a genuine
difference for some low - income students — but they have led to little or no improvement
in the
performance of low - income children as a whole.
According to Robert Hall, professor of pediatrics at the University of Missouri
School of Medicine
in Kansas City, there was no statistical
difference in growth, language development, vision or cognitive development among the children studied, although
in most categories the breast - fed infants did show slightly better
performance.
Regardless of whether you stay home or work, the National Education Association's research has proven that parent involvement
in schools makes a
difference in a child's academic
performance and how long she actually stays
in school.
Evidence on the
performance of academies compared to local authority
schools is mixed, but on the whole suggests there is no substantial
difference in performance.
According to NFER «the
differences in school GCSE
performance between sponsored academies that have been open for between two and four years and a group of similar maintained
schools were generally small and mostly not statistically significant.»
The
differences in performance then reflect
school quality rather than
differences in ability or family background.
Birth weight makes a
difference to a child's future academic
performance, according to new Northwestern University research that found heavier newborns do better
in elementary and middle
school than infants with lower birth weights.
«The reason for this is well documented by previous studies: parents respond to even the smallest marginal
differences in the
performance of local
schools.
Dr Zsu is
schooled in Functional Diagnostic Medicine, Clinical Nutrition, Exercise Physiology, Physical Education, NLP and Timeline Therapy; a Yoga master trainer, who is committed to making a
difference and optimize
performance through mindset and lifestyle.
The
performance differences, however, while statistically significant, are much smaller than those found
in the NAEP analysis, which supports the view that control variables used
in the NAEP models are biased against private
schools.
Evaluations led by Harvard's Tom Kane and MIT's Josh Angrist have used this lottery - based method to convince most skeptics that the impressive test - score
performance of the Boston charter sector reflects real
differences in school quality rather than the types of students charter
schools serve.
PISA shows that the
difference in performance between advantaged and disadvantaged students
in Australia is the equivalent of around three years of
schooling.
In a study that examined whether some countries are particularly effective at teaching students from disadvantaged backgrounds, Eric A. Hanushek, Paul E. Peterson, and Ludger Woessmann find little difference in the rank order of countries by the performance of students from families where a parent had a college education and the rank order of countries by the performance of students whose parents had no more than a high school diplom
In a study that examined whether some countries are particularly effective at teaching students from disadvantaged backgrounds, Eric A. Hanushek, Paul E. Peterson, and Ludger Woessmann find little
difference in the rank order of countries by the performance of students from families where a parent had a college education and the rank order of countries by the performance of students whose parents had no more than a high school diplom
in the rank order of countries by the
performance of students from families where a parent had a college education and the rank order of countries by the
performance of students whose parents had no more than a high
school diploma.
EW: Why do you think arts integration has made such a
difference in the
performance of students
in some low - income
schools?
Some teachers may conclude that exerting additional effort will produce little
difference in the overall
performance of the
school.
What could account for the
differences in the estimated effects of SAT
performance and the high -
school dropout rates?
The OECD says results from the PISA collaborative problem - solving assessment show only 9 per cent of the
differences in students» scores (after accounting for their
performance in the three core domains of science, reading and mathematics), is observed between
schools.
These
differences in school effectiveness have important consequences for students» academic
performance.
A Better Way to Compare State
Performance on NAEP By Matthew M. Chingos and Kristin Blagg Demographically - adjusted data provide important insights into differences in state - level school p
Performance on NAEP By Matthew M. Chingos and Kristin Blagg Demographically - adjusted data provide important insights into
differences in state - level
school performanceperformance.
Another study, by Eric Hanushek and Margaret Raymond, both also at Stanford, evaluated the impact of
school - accountability policies on state - level NAEP math and reading achievement measured by the
difference between the
performance of a state's 8th graders and that of 4th graders
in the same state four years earlier.
«The fact that there are large
differences in subsequent
performance suggests that the charter
schools were indeed having an impact.
Before Putnam employed the concept to explain
differences in governmental
performance between northern and southern Italy, Coleman and his colleagues developed it to theorize why students
in Catholic
schools excel academically relative to their public
school peers.
Studying the association between academy status for primary and secondary
schools and their pupils» attainment
in the Key Stage 2 tests and GCSE exams from last year, NFER claims that there is no significant
difference between the
performance of primary academies and maintained
schools.
«Good and outstanding
schools with the opportunity to cherry pick the best trainees may further exacerbate the stark
differences in local and regional
performance.
Second, most
school districts ignored these important
differences in performance by treating all teachers as interchangeable parts, a phenomenon dubbed the «widget effect»
in a timely 2009 report by TNTP (formerly The New Teacher Project).
Most
differences between
performance in public and private
schools, according to the report, can be attributed to elements
in the family background of the students, such as family income and the parents» educational level.
Finally, we evaluate the degree to which
differences in relative test score
performance (or growth) of high - SES versus low - SES students are largely occurring within
school districts or across
school districts.
I think the
performance assessments that should make the most
difference for students should be developed by teachers to reflect state standards and the
school's curriculum and provide flexibility so that students can show their capacity
in multiple ways.
It's become a familiar sight for education policy mavens this election season: panel discussions,
in Washington and elsewhere, hashing out the presumptive presidential nominees»
differences on
performance pay for teachers, private
school vouchers, and other reliable topics of debate.
This analysis makes clear that large
differences in the
performance of high - SES students and low - SES students
in the same
schools do exist; that these apparent gaps are not simply reflective of gaps
in preparation; and that while the variation across
school districts is substantial, the variation within
school districts may be even larger (at least among the largest districts
in Florida).
Moreover, the cross-
school differences in the relative success of advantaged and disadvantaged students argue for enacting
school accountability policies that shine the light on the success of specific populations, rather than concentrating solely on overall schoolwide
performance levels or gains.
Mr. Stevenson has conducted extensive research on
differences in American and Asian children's
school performance and parents» attitudes.
My working hypothesis is that
differences in educational institutions explain more of the international variation
in student
performance than
differences in the resources nations devote to
schooling.
This large cross-school variation
in SES
performance gaps could be because they educate high - SES and low - SES students differently, or it could be that there are major fundamental
differences across
schools in the relative pre-school preparation of high - SES and low - SES students.
Examining a wide variety of possible explanations for country - to - country
differences in 8th - grade
performance on the Third International Mathematics and Science Study, Woessmann finds that the amount nations spend on their
schools is only marginally related to how well their
schools do.
There are real
differences in performance at the
school level.
The higher
performance of students
in schools using the literacy hour, coupled with the fact that this
difference continues to be observed even after taking into account other
differences among
schools, makes us reasonably confident that we have pinned down the effect attributable to the policy.
Looking at the SAT and ACT
performance of high
school graduates by racial group, the percentage changes (about 5 percentage points from the third year on) are similar among white, black, and Hispanics, but the
differences in impact relative to the prior
performance of each group are sizable.
In OECD countries generally, a large percentage of between - school variation in student performance is «explained» by differences in students» and schools» socioeconomic circumstance
In OECD countries generally, a large percentage of between -
school variation
in student performance is «explained» by differences in students» and schools» socioeconomic circumstance
in student
performance is «explained» by
differences in students» and schools» socioeconomic circumstance
in students» and
schools» socioeconomic circumstances.
A straightforward national indicator of disparities between Australian
schools is the percentage of total variance
in students»
performances attributable to «between -
school»
differences (with the remaining variance being «within -
school»).