Not exact matches
The landmark 1966 Coleman Report highlighted the importance of peer environment along a number of dimensions, but work by Caroline Hoxby and Gretchen Weingarth
in 2006 suggests that the share of poor
students has only a modest
effect on
achievement once
differences in the prior
achievement of
students have been accounted for.
Consistent with the Wisconsin evidence, parallel studies
in Colorado and Maryland found that weather - related
differences in the number of days
students had spent
in school when they were tested had noticeable
effects on their
achievement.
These patterns suggest that the positive
effects of charter school attendance on educational attainment are not due solely to measured
differences in the
achievement of
students in charter and traditional public high schools.
Although comparable measures of the rate of
student learning are not available for Chile, researchers studying the Chilean school system typically consider a
difference in student achievement of 10 percent of one standard deviation to be a small to moderate
effect.
Performance metrics tied directly to
student test - score growth are appealing because although schools and teachers differ dramatically
in their
effects on
student achievement, researchers have had great difficulty linking these performance
differences to characteristics that are easily observed and measured.
Differences among schools
in their facilities and staffing «are so little related to
achievement levels of
students that, with few exceptions, their
effect fails to appear even
in a survey of this magnitude,» the authors concluded.
The study's authors speculate on four potential explanations for the large negative
effects that their program evaluation found: misalignment of private school curriculum to the Louisiana State Standards;
differences between serving scholarship
students with
achievement gaps and traditional private school
students; success of other education developments, especially
in New Orleans; and the overall quality of private schools willing to participate
in the program.
Small
differences in the estimated
effects of teachers on their
students»
achievement can appear to be much larger, because most teachers are about equally successful with the assortment of
students they teach
in a given year, regardless of whether those
students begin the year as low - achievers or high - achievers.
It turns out that the quality of state standards is not related to past gains
in student achievement, the levels at which states set past proficiency standards did not make a
difference in achievement, and standards have little
effect on the variation on National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) scores both within and among states.