The paper suggests that international differences in educational institutions explain the large international
differences in student performance in cognitive achievement tests.
The difference in test scores produced by the incentive system was about the same as that detected in earlier studies that measured
differences in student performance when kids were taught by great teachers rather than average teachers.
He found significant variability in LAUSD teacher quality, as demonstrated by student performance on standardized tests in reading and math, and he concluded that differences between «high - performing» and «low - performing» teachers accounted for
differences in student performance.
While test vendors provide estimates of split - test reliability, these measures do not account for potentially important day - to - day
differences in student performance.
With just a single year of data [41] there is no way to know whether
differences in student performance across schools are due to school factors or differences in the average quality of teachers.
The Schools of Opportunity Project's aim is to help narrow so - called «achievement gaps» (i.e.
the differences in student performance driven by differences in classroom opportunities) by acknowledging schools that, like Ossining, offer innovative programs that embrace new teaching methods and strive to provide every student with the tools to excel.
These types of school - based interventions can also reduce racial, ethnic, and gender
differences in student performance.
When you look at the problems the Leadership Team identified and the related discussion, you realize that there is apparently no recognition that the racial and ethnic dispositions of the school staff might be related to
differences in student performance.
The real issue behind
differences in student performance is unequal access to a high - quality, challenging curriculum.
In higher - performing settings, district leaders understood that the reasons for
differences in student performance, or in implementation of district initiatives, were particular to the setting.
To my mind, the failure to find meaningful
differences in student performance between charter schools that do and don't use computerized learning is significant.
Like policy researchers, measurement researchers generally have not distinguished among different subject areas in their targets for study or in their conclusions and recommendations, even though Linn (1998)(a prominent measurement researcher) has found
differences in student performance across subject areas and within subscales of the same subject area.
school - based factors that explain
differences in student performance and program implementation (e.g., instructional expertise, curriculum implementation, learning gaps, staffing, leadership, material resources);
This is a significant opportunity, given that the evidence suggests that teacher quality is the most important school factor in explaining
differences in student performance.
«Non-Cognitive Abilities and Spanish Regional
Differences in Student Performance in PISA 2009.»
While much more research is needed to understand the effectiveness of virtual schooling for students in K — 12, the small body of research available points to no significant
differences in student performance in online courses versus face - to - face learning.
Although between - school
differences in student performance are closely associated with socioeconomic status in all OECD countries, some countries have been more successful than others in reducing the impact of socioeconomic disadvantage.
Average Year 9 reading results for schools in three ICSEA groups (2009 to 2013) Of particular concern is the observation that, since 2000, between - school
differences in student performance in PISA have been increasing.
At the other extreme, countries that have adopted policies to stream students into different kinds of secondary schools have created large between - school
differences in student performance (between - school variance above 60 per cent).
The graph shows that students in these three ICSEA - based groupings of schools have different average reading levels and gives some indication of the influence of socioeconomic factors on between - school
differences in student performance.
Many have identified variations in teacher quality as a key factor in international
differences in student performance and have urged policies that will lift the quality of the U.S. teaching force.
The socioeconomic
differences in student performance are well - known and extensively documented.
A major study, issued in 1966 by James S. Coleman and his co-authors, documented extreme
differences in student performance by race.
She found
no difference in student performance before and after the conversion.
Two weeks ago I argued that it will be difficult to evaluate whether adopting the Common Core standards is, overall, a good move, because so many factors go into student outcomes (and interact with one another) that a positive change in one factor might yield
no difference in student performance.
This means that there is little
difference in student performance across economic strata.
How to bring out the best in your staff — and in yourself Research shows that the single variable that makes the most
difference in student performance is the quality of the teacher.
Research has shown that «
the difference in student performance in a single academic year from having a good as opposed to a bad teacher can be more than one full year of standardized achievement.»
Not exact matches
Along the way, certainly, those efforts have produced individual successes — schools and programs that make a genuine
difference for some low - income
students — but they have led to little or no improvement
in the
performance of low - income children as a whole.
The attacks continued when Assemblywoman Inez Barron (D - Brooklyn) blasted Deputy Chancellor John White over the
difference in performance between white and black
students.
From my experience (looking at other PhDs
in my faculty), I do not see much
difference in the
performance of Dutch vs foreign Phd
students.
«But I was blown away by the
difference retrieval practice made
in the
students»
performance.»
During his time as an undergraduate
student, he was a member of two cognitive neuroscience laboratories, where he worked on research studies examining how structural
differences in the brain correlate with
performance on cognitive tests.
In conducting this type of study, one must rule out other differences, such as those in family background or those in state education policies that might also affect student performance over tim
In conducting this type of study, one must rule out other
differences, such as those
in family background or those in state education policies that might also affect student performance over tim
in family background or those
in state education policies that might also affect student performance over tim
in state education policies that might also affect
student performance over time.
While existing research has compared academic
performance between
in - person and online
students, little is known about the
differences among the
students themselves.
Evaluations led by Harvard's Tom Kane and MIT's Josh Angrist have used this lottery - based method to convince most skeptics that the impressive test - score
performance of the Boston charter sector reflects real
differences in school quality rather than the types of
students charter schools serve.
To measure gains
in student achievement, we calculate the
difference between 8th - grade
performance in each subject and the
performance level that would have been expected based on
performance in both subjects
in 4th grade.
PISA shows that the
difference in performance between advantaged and disadvantaged
students in Australia is the equivalent of around three years of schooling.
In a study that examined whether some countries are particularly effective at teaching students from disadvantaged backgrounds, Eric A. Hanushek, Paul E. Peterson, and Ludger Woessmann find little difference in the rank order of countries by the performance of students from families where a parent had a college education and the rank order of countries by the performance of students whose parents had no more than a high school diplom
In a study that examined whether some countries are particularly effective at teaching
students from disadvantaged backgrounds, Eric A. Hanushek, Paul E. Peterson, and Ludger Woessmann find little
difference in the rank order of countries by the performance of students from families where a parent had a college education and the rank order of countries by the performance of students whose parents had no more than a high school diplom
in the rank order of countries by the
performance of
students from families where a parent had a college education and the rank order of countries by the
performance of
students whose parents had no more than a high school diploma.
EW: Why do you think arts integration has made such a
difference in the
performance of
students in some low - income schools?
The paper also cites PISA data from 2012 showing girls studying physics «had lower confidence than their male classmates, despite tests revealing no
difference in academic
performance; and that
students confidence
in their maths abilities were more likely to embark on STEM careers».
Hattie also also criticises
performance pay models
in the report, saying that it is «difficult to find a
performance - pay model that has made much, if any,
difference to
student learning» and that they often cause higher stress levels for teachers, which can cause them to lose enthusiasm.
[xi] Di Xu and Shanna Jaggars, «
Performance Gaps Between Online and Face - to - Face Courses:
Differences Across Types of
Students and Academic Subject Areas,» Journal of Higher Education 85 (3), 633 - 659, 2014; Cassandra Hart, Elizabeth Friedmann, and Michael Hill, «Online Course - Taking and
Student Outcomes
in California Community Colleges,» Education Finance and Policy, forthcoming.
In addition, the differences in the success rates of students meeting key performance levels on each test are not due to differences in the tests» underlying ability to predict college outcome
In addition, the
differences in the success rates of students meeting key performance levels on each test are not due to differences in the tests» underlying ability to predict college outcome
in the success rates of
students meeting key
performance levels on each test are not due to
differences in the tests» underlying ability to predict college outcome
in the tests» underlying ability to predict college outcomes.
The OECD says results from the PISA collaborative problem - solving assessment show only 9 per cent of the
differences in students» scores (after accounting for their
performance in the three core domains of science, reading and mathematics), is observed between schools.
These
differences in school effectiveness have important consequences for
students» academic
performance.
In ELA, students in PARCC's college - ready performance category were about 8 percentage points more likely to achieve a 3.0 GPA than students rated as proficient on MCAS, but the difference is not statistically significan
In ELA,
students in PARCC's college - ready performance category were about 8 percentage points more likely to achieve a 3.0 GPA than students rated as proficient on MCAS, but the difference is not statistically significan
in PARCC's college - ready
performance category were about 8 percentage points more likely to achieve a 3.0 GPA than
students rated as proficient on MCAS, but the
difference is not statistically significant.
The college - level studies find «no significant
difference»
in student performance in online courses versus traditional face - to - face courses, and
in particular programs that
students learning online are performing «equally well or better».»
If the gains observed for 4th graders were a function of
differences in the type of
students entering that grade due to the retention policy, then the
performance of those entering 3rd grade should look essentially the same after 2002 as it did before the retention policy was put into place.
Before Putnam employed the concept to explain
differences in governmental
performance between northern and southern Italy, Coleman and his colleagues developed it to theorize why
students in Catholic schools excel academically relative to their public school peers.