Sentences with phrase «differences in the culture of»

The 54 - year - old businessman and naval reservist said he's not about «politicking» — he's running to «make a difference in a culture of corruption.»

But taken as a whole, I believe these characteristics reflect real differences in the culture of these, and other, institutions.

This is mainly due to the differences in the cultures of the Russian women as they are rather more family - oriented as compared to Western...

This is mainly due to the differences in the cultures of the Russian women as they are rather more family - oriented as compared to Western women who tend to be career - oriented.

«It has made a huge difference in the culture of the school.»

«As school leaders, we have enormous opportunity to make a difference in the culture of our very own school community.

Not exact matches

«More and more women are dropping out of the corporate world owing to the non-inclusive culture and we wanted to create a difference in the scenario.

«The culture of Ultimate Software is all about acceptance — not just in regard to differences in race, gender, or orientation, but also our individual personalities.

HRT: One of the most difficult aspects of that year spent in Jordan was the loneliness and isolation that you experience being in a foreign culture and how you're often misunderstood just because of the cultural differences, and how alienating that can feel.

Gladys Kong, CEO, UberMedia: «It gives both sides the opportunity of being a mentor and a mentee to learn about a culture that's different, the common challenges in starting a business, but also the differences in running a business.»

This exposure to contemporary Asia has created a new bottom - up understanding of that region's cultures and societies, a stark difference from the more distant and top - down view our parents may have had when they were in their 20s and 30s.

@fimilleur from time to time mankind experiences the presence of God, there have been and continue to be events that testify to the presence of Him.The multiple gods you continually point to have an unique difference from the God who first revealed His presence to ancient men i.e. the Hebrews.The particular gods you mention roman etc. are all man made and in many instances men themselves i.e. hercules, but even the ancient greeks realized the limitations of their understanding and included an «unknown» God in their worship structure.many cultures did likewise, having a glimpse of God but not the fullness of understanding that was given to the Jews.Whether or not «we» believe, does not alter the fact that God exists as an unique being, whether or not «we» acknowledge Him «we» will stand before Him.You do not choose to understand, but we are actually standing in His presence right now as He is much bigger than the doctrines and knowledge man ascribes to Him those things you find so questionable are the misconceptions and misrepresentations of God made by men throughout history.

Difference is, everyone knows that the sun actually does come up every morning, across every culture and in every corner of the globe.

In discussing the loss of culture, manners, belief» once associated with the American South as stereotypical, in contrast to the North as the «land of industry»» Percy remarks the dissolving of those differences, though in some degree they once obtained in our historIn discussing the loss of culture, manners, belief» once associated with the American South as stereotypical, in contrast to the North as the «land of industry»» Percy remarks the dissolving of those differences, though in some degree they once obtained in our historin contrast to the North as the «land of industry»» Percy remarks the dissolving of those differences, though in some degree they once obtained in our historin some degree they once obtained in our historin our history.

We are stuck in a boundaried culture where the walls are being constantly bombarded by the influx of others and their influences and differences.

The controversy highlights the biggest misconception around Grand Theft Auto, and underscores one of the most precarious lines in popular culture: the difference between presentation and endorsement.

This leads to the fourth and most promising possible solution to the problem of intergroup conflict, that is, the emergence of a single pluralistic world society, in which there will be ample provision for individual and group differences, but not on the basis of relatively independent culture groups.

«We hope for a renewed appreciation of the fundamental importance of sexual difference in our culture and the accompaniment of those who experience conflict in their sense of self and God - given identity.»

For Walter Ong, a Jesuit theorist, of paramount importance in understanding the difference between oral and literate cultures are knowledge storage and retrieval devices.

Although we are dealing here with the Islamic culture of the Arab and African countries, it is our contention that the diversities found in Islam are not due to variations in geographic environments or to different civilizations, but are due only to recognized sectarian differences.

The Council fathers knew, of course, that there would always be differences of social status, talent and national character, but in their view great genuine culture does not presuppose the existence of a large number of men who are poor, socially weak and exploited.

Despite their differences, none of the undergraduates seemed interested in challenging, supporting, or even mentioning Houellebecq's characterization of Islam as fundamentally discordant with French culture.

Each of us contributes more to the common good when we dare to undertake a journey into our own particularity (this family, this community, this people, this culture, this religion) than when we attempt to homogenize all differences in favor of some lowest common denominator.

Thanks be to God for His grace to us; even in this life to make a difference of sorts in the culture we live in.

While debate over the understanding of Biblical interpretation lies at the heart of current evangelical discussions concerning women, differences in theological tradition lie at the center of discussions over social ethics, and disagreement over one's approach toward the wider secular culture is surfacing as the focus of controversy regarding homosexuality.

The other way of getting beyond the current «awkward» stage in the relations between «Christ and Culture» (to use H. Richard Niebuhr's convenient nomenclature) is to accentuate the dimension of distance, difference, discontinuity vis «a vis the two.

Speaking to popular culture blog Assignment X, the author said this as he again described the difference between his work and Tolkien's: «I think ultimately the battle between good and evil is weighed within the individual human heart, not necessarily between an army of people dressed in white and an army of people dressed in black.

When we realize Him to be all in all — to be the meaning and content of everything that all creation is about, then all the nonsensical issues that we make Christianity about (i.e., denominations, docrinal differences, Christian culture, saving the world... the list is endless) will fade away.

It may be in fact destructive of either ignorance or knowledge; the one sure aspect of it is that people are different after they have it than they were before, but to assume that in all cultures this difference is desirable is again a probably erroneous inference.32.

If we unpack the culture - wars argument carefully, we will see that the answer rests in large part on the differences between the institutions of politics and government and the social movements that are the focus of the culture - wars rhetoric.

I was bothered by theological critics of literature who, following Tillich's too - easy baptizing of the secular order (epitomized in his phrase «as the substance of culture is religion, so the form of religion is culture»), tended to overlook the differences between Christianity and the insights of art.

Despite all our cultural differences, despite the structures in society and in the Church that obscure our confession of Christ, and despite our sinfulness, we affirm and confess Christ together, for we have found that he is not alien to any culture and that he redeems and judges all our societies.

If they are from a biblically conservative tradition they are likely to use selected references to sexuality, marriage, and family to communicate the ideals of God in a way that will encourage and motivate people to strive for the ideal.6 This didactic use of the Bible fails to distinguish the radical difference between family life and the religious practices of ancient and modern cultures.

And one of the most poignant differences I noticed was in the culture of testimonies as it was practiced in these churches: Several conversations opened with the question, «So, how did you come to Christ?»

And finally, he may perceive that in spite of differences of age, culture, education, and social involvement, there are basic problems and needs common to us all.

The disadvantage is that the specific differences are in danger of being drowned in this great synthesis, and that the necessary respect and, consequently, caution in the approximation between confessions, religions and cultures is being disregarded.

Perhaps what's most interesting about his new book - The Difference God Makes: A Catholic Vision of Faith, Communion, and Culture (Crossroad, 384 pages, $ 26.95)- is the sheer fact of it, for no one besides Cardinal George has both the talent and the ecclesial weight to attempt what he's after in the book.

This «othering» takes various facets, including the «othering» through difference, difference in terms of local and external culture, difference in terms of acceptable and unacceptable food and drink, and difference in terms of debased sexual attitudes.

Hindu nationalism, which is alive and well in India today, is concertedly engaged in the assignment of absorbing minorities into its ideology, Driven by the ideology of Hindutva — a term coined by V. D. Sarvarkar10 which has always advocated a comprehensive project involving the coming together of culture, society, and politics, it seeks to fuse all the distinct particularities and differences of religious minorities (Muslims and Christians) and ethnocultural minorities (Dalits and Adivasis) into its Brahmanic construction of an Indian nation.

Alternate frameworks for collective living in India must be in the business of detecting the elements of distinctiveness (even if through difference) of Dalit and Adivasi culture and religion, which are inscribed into the communicative practices of the community, in order to represent its collective identity to itself as well as to the nation - state.

The new middle class, I would argue, has a number of morally positive features, especially in its attitudes toward race and toward ethnic or other cultural differences; it is a racially and ethnically tolerant culture, and this is good.

The growing difference within evangelicalism regarding contextualization is described helpfully by David Wells in his essay: «In the one understanding of contextualization, the revelatory trajectory moves only from authoritative Word into contemporary culture; in the other, the trajectory moves both from text to context and from context to text...» Increasingly, evangelicals are opting for the second of these models - an «interactionist» approach, to use William Dymess» terminologin his essay: «In the one understanding of contextualization, the revelatory trajectory moves only from authoritative Word into contemporary culture; in the other, the trajectory moves both from text to context and from context to text...» Increasingly, evangelicals are opting for the second of these models - an «interactionist» approach, to use William Dymess» terminologIn the one understanding of contextualization, the revelatory trajectory moves only from authoritative Word into contemporary culture; in the other, the trajectory moves both from text to context and from context to text...» Increasingly, evangelicals are opting for the second of these models - an «interactionist» approach, to use William Dymess» terminologin the other, the trajectory moves both from text to context and from context to text...» Increasingly, evangelicals are opting for the second of these models - an «interactionist» approach, to use William Dymess» terminology.

One difference is that today's commentaries hold very little knowledge of Torah culture and even the Jewish dialogue going on in the New Testament and although they have a lot of knowledge, it is diluted by a full cultural engagement which leaves a lot out with a very gentile understanding of Scripture.

In spite of the vast differences in languages and cultures among group members and between them and us as leaders, remarkable things happeneIn spite of the vast differences in languages and cultures among group members and between them and us as leaders, remarkable things happenein languages and cultures among group members and between them and us as leaders, remarkable things happened.

The difference between education understood only as training in technical skills within the ideology of the economic growth and education for promoting a technical society within the framework of a culture of «scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform», is indeed great.

The world is still characterized by an enormous range of differences in language, culture, economic patterns religious practices, values, wealth, educational levels, and so on and on.

Because of the wide individual differences which are seen in any culture, these destructive attributes are focused with greater force on some than on others.

The difference evident in these priorities is a reflection of a difference in attitudes, which is, in turn, a reflection of differences in culture and experience.

Explore our interactive database of the full list of this year's 100 women making a difference in fields ranging from business through to culture.

Kontos Foods was founded 1987 in Paterson, N.J., by Evripides (Evris) Kontos and his son Steve, to manufacture the popular flatbread of the Mediterranean cultures, but they knew they needed a unique Point - of - Difference to be successful.