Sentences with phrase «differences in the results observed»

This may explain the differences in results observed between studies.

Additionally, Lunnen et al. (1981) made use of surface electrodes while Guex et al. (2012) used fine wire electrodes, which may have also led to differences in the results observed.

Not exact matches

To test the robustness of this finding in light of the possible effect of these 2 infants, we repeated the UniFrac analysis after reassigning those 2 infants from the mixed feeding group to the exclusively formula — fed group, and no qualitative differences in the results were observed (data not shown).

This supports the interpretation that use of the materials resulted in the observed difference.

We now have to observe how the coma evolves as it nears the sun, to determine whether the changes in the coma are a result of temperature differences alone or whether the nucleus itself is inhomogeneous.»

«In fact, our results for prejudice were comparable to life expectancy differences that have been observed between individuals with and without a high school education.»

Many factors may cause differences between current expectations and actual results including unexpected safety or efficacy data observed during preclinical or clinical studies, clinical trial site activation or enrollment rates that are lower than expected, changes in expected or existing competition, changes in the regulatory environment, failure of Syndax's collaborators to support or advance collaborations or product candidates and unexpected litigation or other disputes.

Hence, it could be suggested that the small differences in the calcification rates observed between 100 mg / L and 200 mg / L calcium additions during the day could be a result of relatively mediocre photosynthetic activities of the endo - symbionts, but this should be further studied.

The reason for the difference in the fold change in ULK1 RNA levels observed in WT and DAXX K / D PC3 cells between the RNA - Seq and Q - PCR analyses is unclear, but we believe that the Q - PCR result is reliable based on the replicates we obtained.

«For this reason, it is thought the observed differences in nose shape among populations are not simply the result of genetic drift, but may be adaptations to climate.»

As we did not observe any proliferation or apoptosis differences in the non-CSC or the CSC - enriched fraction in ER - α — positive cell lines, we hypothesize that either self - renewal symmetry is altered or cells are caused to dedifferentiate resulting in the increased CSC numbers seen.

The current results provide a potential mechanistic understanding for the observed differences between Vitamin C in supplements vs food in prior studies.

The OECD says results from the PISA collaborative problem - solving assessment show only 9 per cent of the differences in students» scores (after accounting for their performance in the three core domains of science, reading and mathematics), is observed between schools.

The results of this analysis again provide little evidence that low middle - school quality stems from differences in the school characteristics we can observe.

The small differences that were observed could have been caused by normal variability in test results.

State Street Corp., the third - largest issuer of ETFs, hasn't observed any measurable difference in bid - ask spreads as a result of their usage, Dave Lavalle, head of SPDR ETF capital markets, said on a panel last month.

The difference observed in your Retirement Savings Account (RSA) balances is a result of the changes in the RSA Fund's unit price.

«The differences observed in this study were the results of the cat's predatory behavior.»

However, the «observed» data on this is itself somewhat uncertain — for instance, comparing the SAGE results (reported in Gray et al, 2011) with the SABER results (Merkel et al, 2011), shows a big difference in how large the ozone response is.

A couple of years ago, I observed that the introduction of Mennian methods to USCHN appeared to impact GISS US (resulting in warming relative to USHCN v1), where the difference between the 1930s and the early 2000s increased by 0.3 deg C between 2007 and 2011, an increase that I postulated to arise from Mennian methodology, though I did not further analyse these methods at the time.

Compared with the 1950 — 2005 results, the larger model versus observed difference over 1900 — 2005 is due to a much larger observed warming in the early twentieth century than the model expectation.

The lowest ratio is for the minimum difference between the observed maximum and minimum temperatures and that is over 22,000 times greater than the temperature difference that would result from the proposed 30 % reduction in emissions.

The difference between modeled and observed TSI might be the result of underrepresented weak magnetic fields in the Carrington rotation synoptic charts, an uncertainty in the TSI measurement, or a decline of the global temperature of the photosphere.

This difference is attributable to larger than observed changes in maximum temperatures in four of the five models analysed here, a result consistent with previous modelling studies.»

The observed differences between their study and our assessment can further result from variations in the base data employed: Jongman et al. [73] used a finer resolution SRTM grid at 3 arc sec resolution but coarser resolution population density data at 5 arc min resolution and, as mentioned earlier, an older version of the UN's demographic data.

This can be seen at: The formula used was: dCair = 0.5415 * F (emissions) / 0.21 + 3 * dtemp This resulted in a mean difference of trends (observed - calculated) = 0.00; correlation between the series = 0.65; R ^ 2 = 0.42 (which is poor); stdev of the calculated and observed series = 0.55 ppmv It looks like that the calculated CO2 increase / variations are leading the observed ones.

By lagging the CO2 result from temperature changes one year, the calculated variation was lagging the observed: The same coefficients were used, no difference in trends and stdev, correlation between the series = 0.732; R ^ 2 = 0.536 (which is fair).

The investigators would have been notified of the results prior to completion of the study only if a difference in pregnancy rates or STI rates with a critical P value of less than or equal to.001 was observed between either the pharmacy access group or the advance provision group compared with the clinic access group.

According to the results, statistically significant differences were observed in students» ego orientation between the genders and the classes of the students.

Social support and needs fulfillment can act to buffer this stress; however, results indicate that this varies by gender, with gender differences observed in strain, perceived support, and expressed needs among MS caregivers.

These results are supported by fidelity findings from the structured observations (N = 27) carried out in a sample of classes over the course of the study (observations: mean number of observed activities full implementation = 90.9 %; partial implementation = 2.3 %; activities not implemented = 6.8 %) Given that there was no significant difference in the level of programme adherence between the intervention groups, the impact results were analysed by comparing the intervention group's results (i.e. intervention Type I combined with intervention Type II) with the control group's results.

The effectiveness of cognitive behaviour therapy in this study was similar to that observed in patients who accepted treatment in the initial uncontrolled evaluation.10 The results differed, however, from those of the two previous controlled trials of cognitive behaviour therapy, one of which was a non-randomised comparison with a waiting list11 and the other a randomised comparison with basic medical care.12 The possible reasons for the greater effectiveness of cognitive behaviour therapy in our study include differences in the characteristics of the patients, longer follow up, and possibly less active medical care.

Results indicated that significant difference is observed between female elementary students of experimental and control groups at posttest phase in terms of worry and anxiety.

In sum, gender differences in close relationships may be present, but since an anxious attachment style in single males was observed only in a small sample, these results need to be replicated in a larger and more representative samplIn sum, gender differences in close relationships may be present, but since an anxious attachment style in single males was observed only in a small sample, these results need to be replicated in a larger and more representative samplin close relationships may be present, but since an anxious attachment style in single males was observed only in a small sample, these results need to be replicated in a larger and more representative samplin single males was observed only in a small sample, these results need to be replicated in a larger and more representative samplin a small sample, these results need to be replicated in a larger and more representative samplin a larger and more representative sample.