Sentences with phrase «differences of interpretation»

Another panel considered the way in which South Africa, Nigeria, Kenya, Zambia and Uganda approach international arbitration, with panellists representing the judiciaries of those countries reporting a generally positive outlook, in line with their status as signatories of the New York Convention, although differences of interpretation remain.

I say again that we are totally unembarrassed about correcting genuine errors, but many of the points raised at RealClimate are differences of interpretation.

There has been no ranting by either «side» in the matter, rather genuine differences of interpretation of the data.

Multiple doctors reviewed each image to average out individual differences of interpretation.

But it added: «The dispute arose out of genuine differences of interpretation of the rules between the parties.»

Thus, although it should be easier to teach Western students about Islam than about Hinduism or Buddhism, for there is much in common, the burden of our neighborhood quarrels — not always impartially recorded — and the subtle differences of interpretation make Islam the most difficult religion to present fairly.

Even when one's faith is grounded in the Bible, latitude must be left for differences of interpretation.

Even during the governing of Ali as Caliph there were differences of interpretation of the same sources; at such times not all Muslims followed Ali, but at least the Shi`ites did.

Differences are based on sustained and supported differences of interpretation between faithful and sincere members of the Body — and not just of individuals, but of whole congregations or denominations.

Errors can often be just a difference of interpretation of the facts.

It is almost always a difference of interpretation, which leads to a difference in beliefs.

For that reason, I borrowed, though with a difference of interpretation that made it clear that I was not borrowing the well - known tenets of Platonism along with it, the Platonic phrase «real (Or true) cause» to refer to the agent in his exercise of supervening ontic power.

Under the new rules, marks will only be changed if there is found to be a clear marking error, not where a reviewer has a difference of interpretation.

Not exact matches

The problem with this «blank slate» interpretation of gender differences is that it doesn't jibe with results of developmental studies.

Interpretation of data on imports is complicated by differences in the seasonal adjustments calculated on a monthly and quarterly basis.

Although interpretation of earnings data remains difficult, due to methodological differences in the construction of the various measures (for details see Box A, Statement on Monetary Policy, February 2002), the rebound is evident in both national accounts and financial reporting - based estimates.

There are many interpretations of this dynamic, but here is how we define the primary differences.

I hope that the distinctions to which I have pointed help the reader to see why that would be a mistake, and why we need a framework for sorting out these finer - grained but essential differences in the operations of knowing and valuing underlying persons» selfhood, membership, interpretations, and motivations.

@TownC The difference is that your alleged experience of god was your subjective interpretation of something.

When proper principles of interpretation are applied, and differences in theology exist, at least any differences can be talked about.

For all our differences and ongoing arguments, to be an evangelical means we live in this tradition of interpretation.

In fact, over two thousand years of biblical interpretation, the Christian religion has proved to be ridiculously flexible, able to tolerate significant theological and practical differences without, you know, us having to say «farewell» to people who land on a different interpretation.»

There are minor differences from country to country in the manner of praying, differences of no importance which have grown up through varying interpretations in the schools of jurisprudence.

The differences are only in the interpretations, as mentioned above, and these differences result primarily from the differences in standards of education.

Interestingly enough, the Sartrian notion of man's pour - soi or projective self, as distinguished from his sheer given - ness as en - soi, has a considerable similarity to the general process - idea which we are expounding, whatever may be the differences between the two in statement and interpretation.

I generally accept differences in biblical interpretation with a shrug of my shoulders.

Nothing could be more arbitrary that someones interpretation and differences of opinion, especially about religious issues.

The reasonable different interpretations of the Bible can explain the difference reasonably well.

The task of the didaskalos is to defend the difference between the organic fidelity of our interpretation now and the meaning of the message then as well as to oppose other «adaptations» or «applications» which rather constitute betrayal.

The second main point of difference between Kierkegaard and Girard concerns the starting point for their interpretation of human psychology.

The main difference is Obama doesn't lead state - wide prayer meetings and talk about his biblical interpretations of the bible... like Bachmann's belief in submitting to her husband.

Once more, differences in historic definitions of the ministry are less due to exclusive insistence on some one interpretation of what constitutes a call than to variations in the emphasis placed on the various elements present in every call.

The differences, therefore, which produced first a rift and then an irreconcilable opposition between Jesus and the dominant school of Jewish teachers in his time were not in the end (though they might appear at first sight to be) a matter of divergent interpretations of this or that point in the Law.

The differences between the legalists and the Sufis were apparent in their interpretations of the meaning of religious law and the ways in which it should be derived and justified.

5 I would then like to show how Gunter's interpretation makes a difference to our usual way of approaching the relationship between the two thinkers.

While debate over the understanding of Biblical interpretation lies at the heart of current evangelical discussions concerning women, differences in theological tradition lie at the center of discussions over social ethics, and disagreement over one's approach toward the wider secular culture is surfacing as the focus of controversy regarding homosexuality.

If the latter is the case, and I think it is, then it may be possible to reconcile many of the differences between the two thinkers with some creative interpretation, such that, whether they realized it themselves, Whitehead and Bergson were profoundly similar in basic philosophical outlook.

We have visited this territory already in discussing Whitehead's early interpretation of Bergson's view of the intellect, which turns out to be not a difference of doctrine, but a misunderstanding on Whitehead's part of Bergson's view.

For constructive dialog to happen, Christians must stop conflating differences in interpretation of Scripture with differences in commitment to Scripture.

In the Middle Ages, the slogan was adduced in order to acknowledge that one may speak of a consensus among early Christian writers (consensus patrum) even if these authors displayed some differences in their interpretations of the Scriptures.

The difference stems from Augustine's interpretation of a Latin translation of Romans 5:12 to mean that through Adam all men sinned, whereas the Orthodox reading in Greek interpret it as meaning that all of humanity sins as part of the inheritance of flawed nature from Adam.

It was almost inevitable that differences as to the interpretation of the Koran itself as well as the Traditions should arise.

Many of the differences between Shi`as and Sunnis are due to differing interpretations of the four sources.

It's hard to maintain unity when differences in theology are met with accusations of heresy, and challenges to certain interpretations of the Bible are dismissed as challenges to its authority.

What Bultmann means is that the difference between the mythological language of the New Testament and ecclesiastical dogma on the one hand and his own interpretation on the other is that the former presents us with a «miraculous, supernatural event», whereas the right interpretation is one which suggests «an historical event wrought out in time and space».

Differences between Muslim, Jewish and Christian interpretations of God are due to errors that crept into the other two faiths, Islam teaches.

It was to bring out this difference that the distinction was drawn between Weltbild and Weltanschauung, the former representing a trans - subjective, scientific fact, and the latter man's subjective interpretation of himself, an interpretation which is quite independent of the Weltbild.

On this interpretation then, the temporal span of divine occasion A might be 1/495 of a second, i.e., that span between the satisfaction of an actual entity with a duration of 4/45 of a second and the satisfaction of one with a duration of 1/11 (see above, p. 204) while occasion B would have a longer temporal span, 1/231 of a second, given the difference between the satisfactions of actual entities with spans of 1/11 and 2/21 of a second.

Nevertheless, as paradoxical as it sounds, underlying this difference is also a relationship between Piaget and Whitehead, i.e., Piaget presented a strictly naturalistic interpretation of the Whiteheadian «ontological principle.»

Techniques involved in communicating the spirit of acceptance may vary, and there are differences of judgment as to the part which explicit interpretation by the counselor to the client ought to play.