Highlights for me included: 1) Belcher's call in
Chapter 3 to find common ground in classic / orthodox Christianity (the Apostle's Creed, the Nicene Creed, and the Athanasian Creed) which, if applied, would dramatically reduce some of the name - calling and accusations of heresy that have been most unhelpful in the discussion between the emerging and traditional camps, 2) Belcher's fabulous treatment of postmodernism and postfoundationalism in
Chapter 4, where he rightly explains that when talking about postmodernism, folks in the emerging church and the traditional church are using the same term to refer to two completely
different things, and where he concludes that «a third way rejects classical foundationalism and hard postmodernism,» and 3) Belcher's fair handling of the atonement issue in
Chapter 6, in which he clarifies that most emergering church
leaders «are not against atonement theories and justification, but want to see it balanced with the message of the kingdom of God.»
Two introductory
chapters for Conservative and Labour
leaders — there is a slightly different approach by the editors of Liberal leaders — consider what constitutes «Statecraft» — a framework for assessing Party L
leaders — there is a slightly
different approach by the editors of Liberal
leaders — consider what constitutes «Statecraft» — a framework for assessing Party L
leaders — consider what constitutes «Statecraft» — a framework for assessing Party
LeadersLeaders.
The
chapter on teaching and training group
leaders gives an excellent account of the
different ways educators approach the task of training students to be group
leaders.