Not exact matches
NOW YOU KNOW WHAT ORWELLIAN UNITED
STATES CONGRESS (USSR # 2
which consists of lawyers or what are liars, physicians / doctors and family
members of effected individuals who suffered some sort of brain desease etc.... lawyers, so crime per physicians OR WHAT IS HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION can get away with it) AND OTHER GOVERNMENTS WORLDWIDE ARE SOOO BUSY WITH WHEN PLAYING / CLOWNING (acting) IN FRONT OF CAMERAS ONLY HOW SOMETHING HAVE TO BE DONE (deliberately omitting / delaying facts of genocide as seen on this complain)... NO
DIFFERENT FROM ROMNEY WHOSE FATHER EXCELLED AFTER GM WAS DELIBERATELY SCREWED / BANKRUPT LIKE AMERICA TODAY (soon to be success based on deliberate sabotage
which is nothing else than grand treason / betrayal with acts of genocide against targeted white population)!!!
NOW YOU KNOW WHAT ORWELLIAN UNITED
STATES CONGRESS (USSR # 2
which consists of lawyers or what are liars and physicians as well as family
member of health efected individuals... Why lawyers!!? So crime per physicians OR WHAT IS HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION can get away with it) AND OTHER GOVERNMENTS WORLDWIDE ARE SOOO BUSY WITH WHEN PLAYING / CLOWNING (acting) IN FRONT OF CAMERAS ONLY HOW SOMETHING HAVE TO BE DONE (deliberately omitting / delaying facts of genocide as seen on this complain) NO
DIFFERENT FROM ROMNEY»S FATHER WHO EXCELLED AFTER GM WAS DELIBERATELY SCREWED / BANKRUPT (LIKE AMERICA TODAY = success based on deliberate sabotage = known as grand treason)!!!
In order to avoid misunderstandings it may be said in passing that such rules must be
different in a society like the
state of
which one is a compulsory
member, from those obtaining in a voluntary society like the Church, to
which one need not belong.
At one point it even commends to the attention of the EU «examples of
Member States combining the liberal legislation of abortion with effective sexuality education, high - quality family planning services and the availability of
different contraceptives
which combine lower abortion rates and higher birth rates.»
Now, if a
member of a family or household is convicted of one of more than 10
different crimes — including criminal obstruction of breathing or blood circulation, menacing and unlawful imprisonment — the conviction is reported to the
state Division of Criminal Justice Services,
which then allows that agency to report the information to the Federal Bureau of Investigations.
Throughout the collection, we were keen to showcase the
different parts of the UN system, not just its structures and programmes, but also the various actors who make up what is often lazily referred to as «the UN»:
member states, staff and the host of groups — NGOs, academics, private sector companies, foundations, regional organisations, etc. — with
which it works.
Parts of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act,
which come into force tomorrow (Friday February 29), will require small employers to understand and verify up to thirteen
different forms of identification when employing foreign workers, including recognising the passports of 27 EU
member states.
These manifest themselves quite differently in
different member states, depending on the speed at
which the substances become available and the severity of their impact on public health.
Albany, NY —
Members of the New York
State Senate overwhelmingly approved pieces of legislation
which are part of the Independent Democratic Conference's Religious Freedom package on Tuesday to combat hate - inspired crimes in New York
State and to promote tolerance amongst those of
different cultures and ethnicities.
Each country presently uses
different machines and software
which means that police computers, immigration offices and tax authorities in
different member states can not exchange data.
One of the main outcomes of the Rio +20 Conference was the agreement by
member States to launch a process to develop a set of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs),
which will build upon the Millennium Development Goals and converge with the post 2015 development agenda (click here for information on
different work streams).
Thankfully, research on
which policies work in other
states show us that educational choice programs supported by ALEC
members have a record of success across
different measures, from test score increases, to parental satisfaction, to better life outcomes for students.
Note that there are other PDFs floating around online
which provide
different terms that explicitly
state that you can transfer to your spouse but do not mention anything about household
members.
Those
members came from various
different artworld backgrounds (critic, curator, historian, artist, etc), and the programme, as
stated on its still - live website, «eschewed solo exhibitions in favor of thematically, conceptually and politically driven group exhibitions and projects», such as its inaugural outing, modestly named Part One,
which featured Andrea Fraser's May I Help You?
«It is a very poetical work, in
which the
different layers of time and space are woven into each other in a very intelligent way ``, a
member of the jury
stated.
A
different approach would in practice discourage family
members from looking for employment in the host
Member State,
which would contradict Art. 23 of the Directive that clearly provides family
members with a right to employment and self - employment.
First, the
member state could argue that its obligations under EU law take priority over its BIT obligations, in
which case the priority of one obligation over the other can only be established by applying conflict rules, but such arguments have not been raised in intra-EU arbitrations (apart from conflict arguments challenging the jurisdiction of the tribunals
which is a
different matter).
On appeal, the Austrian Oberster Gerichtshof (OGH) asked the Court
which criteria are to be used to determine jurisdiction under Article 5 (3) to hear an action relating to an alleged infringement of a trademark through the use of a Google AdWord on the website operating under a top - level domain
different from that of the
Member State where the trademark is registered...
Currently, the EU provides a mechanism
which proscribes
which country's jurisdiction takes precedence when there are two hearings taking place simultaneously in
different countries; it enables court orders for maintenance, child contact or injunctions to be enforced in all
member states; it enables information to be shared between nations so a partner can be located across borders; and it ensures cooperation between
member states in cases of child abduction overseas.
Your Attorney Engagement Letter should include details like: the name of the client; the name of the attorney or law firm providing legal services; a description of the legal services being provided; how the attorney will be compensated; whether the attorney will charge hourly rates, or whether the law firm charges
different rates for
different members; the terms of the payment; whether the attorney charges a deposit, and how much; and
which state's laws will govern this agreement.
The second sentence of Article 51 (1)
which imposes the obligations of «respecting» rights, while «observing» and «promoting the application of» principles in accordance with the respective powers also addresses primarily the separation of competences between the Union and its
Member States and the
different duties imposed by rights and principles and not the relevance of fundamental rights in private relations (para 32).
Starting with the general effects of the Charter between private parties, the Advocate General emphasized that Article 51 (1) of the Charter
which speaks of application of the Charter to the Union and the
Member States does not e contrario exclude effects on private parties by not mentioning them (para 29); not only do declarations of fundamental rights typically not address private parties, but Article 51 (1) also primarily addresses the completely
different problem of the reach of the binding effect of the Charter for organs of the Union and the
Member States rather than its effects in the relations between private parties (paras 30 - 31).
It might set a regrettable precedent in
which Member States are required to actively «police» society in order to ensure that individuals do not obstruct trade, something that is conceptually
different from refraining to act in a way that obstructs the free movement of goods.
-- Can Art. 6 (1) on jurisdiction over multiple defendants be applied in a situation where two or more companies from
different Member States are each separately accused of infringing the same national part of a European patent
which is in force in yet another
Member State?
Whilst taking a slightly
different route to get there, the Court of Appeal agreed that the High Court had jurisdiction to make blocking orders under section 37 (1) of the Senior Courts Act, as interpreted in light of Article 11 of the Enforcement Directive (
which provides that
member states shall ensure that rights holders are in a position to apply for an injunction against intermediaries whose services are used by a third party to infringe an IP right).
By giving guidance on the circumstances in
which a national court of last instance is obliged to make a reference to the CJEU with the Ferreira de Silva case one may assert that there is a need to occasionally check the case - law and practice of other courts of the
Member States when a given term gives rise to uncertainty
which ultimately bears the risk of
different interpretation.
These depend on identifying the legal effects of an incompatibility of a
Member State international agreement with EU law,
which creates
different obligations on
different actors under
different legal orders.
However, in this situation, the jury
member was able to uncover the United
States law on the issue
which is quite
different than that of Canada.
Choice of court being unlikely, next up is the application of Article 7 (1) to determine
which court has jurisdiction to hear an application for damages relating to the termination of a commercial concession agreement concluded between two companies, each established and operating in a
different Member State, for the marketing of goods on the domestic market of a third
Member State in
which neither of those companies has a branch or establishment.
Each country within the EU has
different requirements for foreign visitors unless they are participating
Member States of the Schengen agreement,
which allows for persons of certain countries to travel freely within the Schengen area.
«Institutional Advertising» refers to television, radio, and other media advertising, the benefit of
which insures to a multitude of firms or offices
which are not commonly owned or not commonly managed and
which may be found in more than one
Member Board's jurisdiction or in
different states.