Sentences with phrase «different argument from»

That's not a particularly controversial claim or complicated argument, but it is a different argument from the one addressed by Richard on trends in climate variability research.»

It is a «rubish argument» to argue that because there were warmings in the past, the current warming is not primarilly due to increased greenhouse gas concentrations, but that is a different argument from that which RiHo08 implied.

She told ITV's Peston on Sunday: «He's got different arguments from David Cameron, of course he has, but he's wanting us to remain in, there's no doubt about that.»

«If we obtain leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, they aren't bound by their earlier decision,» she tells Legal Feeds, adding she and her colleagues didn't believe stare decisis should determine the outcome since they raised different arguments from those in Rodriguez.

Not exact matches

The judge declared that this was an argument of the «privileged» and said that Ulbricht was no different than a drug dealer from the Bronx.

Note we are reviewing these concerns from a slightly different argument than the active versus passive debate.

Still, it's not exactly a convincing argument; acquisitions also incur significant costs: the price of the acquired asset includes a premium that usually more than covers whatever cost savings might result, and there are significant additional costs that come from integrating two different companies.

I did read the article, yes — and I am familiar with the arguments around Bitcoin from a number of different perspectives.

One argument with superficial attractiveness is that the old regimes failed these countries, and therefore something else — preferably very different from the old regime — will solve the problem.

That's not an argument for God, but it does tell a very different story about Him from the one told by Fry.

His argument seems to hinge on the idea that capital punishment is so extreme and so different from all other punishments that it necessarily falls in the category of «high justice»» an attempt to «balance the cosmic books»» an authority which the state can not rightly wield.

Supporting Sharia law is the same argument the catholic church is making, just from a different cult.

The argument rests on the belief that his Resurrection was not different in kind from what they may look forward to through trusting in him.

Your position as the saver or spender will change issue to issue, but the point here is that each side is coming from a different foundation of financial values, and those core values feed the arguments over money rather than the money situation itself.

It seems to me that a lot of theological and philosophical arguments come from people trying to say the same thing in different words.

I would just like to point out that at least as many comments coming from the supposed religious side of the argument are just as if not more «hostile and demeaning» towards those of different or no faith.

Drawing together the various arguments suggested by these studies, then, we see a view of religion and ideology rather different from that advanced by Weber.

If one destroyed the Genesis story of creation and substituted the gradual emergence of different forms as they struggled for survival in their environment, then one destroyed the entire argument for the proof of God from the evidence of creation.

Not only is Hartshorne's God significantly different from the traditional concept of God, but Hartshorne also provides a revised version of the ontological argument to prove this...

The failure to realize the significance of describing the attributes of God from two different aspects is responsible for most of the disputes and futile arguments with which Muslim books on theology abound.

There's so much more to be said, from various different angles: the experience of the Bible coming alive, intellectual arguments, historical arguments and so on.

Not only is Hartshorne's God significantly different from the traditional concept of God, but Hartshorne also provides a revised version of the ontological argument to prove this God's existence.

Conceived as we now conceive them, as so many fortunate escapes from almost limitless processes of destruction, the benevolent adaptations which we find in Nature suggest a deity very different from the one who figured in the earlier versions of the argument.

Against this latter argument there is one decisive factor: the fact that the «eyewitnesses» would have had to be quite different in interest and concern from any men whose influence we can trace in the synoptic tradition.

According to this account, in contrast to Ricardo's argument from comparative advantage, the more - developed and less - developed countries benefit from trade in quite different ways.

But that is beside the point — the whole argument to be made here is that Christianity and its messengers both try to differentiate themselves from the rest when, in truth, they really are no different.

In analysing such arguments, one must also note that in writers such as Cyprian, the access to the Hebrew scriptures were not only through the canonical text as such, but also, practically, through anthological collections of texts from these writings, which circulated in various forms, being used for diverse purposes in different communities.

Prof. Novak may surely disagree with my arguments, but that is very different from suggesting that I have deliberately tried to mislead people» a charge that is both untrue and defamatory.

(I won't shy away from an argument, but that, and imposing my will are two different things)

It follows from this that to support the rightfulness of euthanasia with a number of essentially different arguments is to put oneself in the wrong from the outset by admitting indirectly that no single absolutely cogent argument exists.

That his concern is legitimate few will deny, and wholly apart from the theoretical issue noted above, this concern constitutes a strong practical argument for a liberal polity (which does no more than promote «some kind of equilibrium, necessarily unstable, between the different aspirations of different groups of human beings»).

I am here today with a lot of different thoughts and fears that have stemmed from all the arguments, heretic hunting, and finger pointing between the Free Grace position and Lordship Salvation position.

But it is question - begging to use that argument to defend the very existence of such a deity against the appearances (which is very different from Whiteheadians using their principles to illuminate the appearances).

I did not mean to upset when I said, «it's only a theory» I just tried to say that the theory is an open, on going, unbiased argument that is completely different from religious doctrines out there.

- the cultural relativity argument which assumes that «the Bible is an old book from a different culture, so we can't take it seriously in the modern world.»

The fact of this common use of opsomai, and also the fact that we are able to explain the switch from crucifixion to parousia reference on the basis of our hypothesis, is, of course, the hub of our argument for a relationship between John 19.37 and Rev. 1.7, a common relationship to different stages of a Christian exegetical tradition.

He more explicitly takes up the arguments of liberals within the mainline church who suggest that conservative histrionics over the inclusion of homosexuals are no different from the resistance to racial or gender inclusiveness or to revision to the Book of Common Prayer (indeed, conservatives on the issue of homosexuality are in some regrettable company in recent history).

some of it not so good however, because we wanted our relationship to be different from our parents, we wrote our own service and that process was incredibly valuable we had massive arguments and really thrashed out what commitment meant to us and that I think has served us through harder times we are very happy and have two wonderful sons they are musicians Ben and Alfie I'd put a link but I don't know how you can just google them though I think you'd like them:)

Arsene Wenger has stated previously saying that the start of last caused the chance of winning the league into vapours and this season is no different and i believe nothing can't be done and only sacking of the manager is the best possibility available at this time cause Wenger won't be asked what the fans think of him cause he will say some bullshit stats of Coquelin when actually he started playing only from 2half of the season and if he feels that stats are his only option to win an argument then he is adamant and has selfish interest cause the fans pay a lot of money to watch Arsenal play.

One of the main arguments of the book, as noted above, is that GCC states are not much different from other states and many of the developments they experience are similar to developments of Western states and are beyond Islam and oil.

Then again, I find BOTH sides of this argument to be illigical idiots from the ground up, by somehow blythely assuming as axiom that the government owes ANYONE (straight or gay) different treatment based on nothing more than an agent of government having previously given them a paper statement that these two are now in a special relationship.

Was he drawing a different tradition or was he developing his ideas through his polemics, kind of making it up from whatever argument carried the day?

Leaving aside the argument that that role may already be played by the VAT, there are some difficulties with this, arising from the fact shown above that the profits margins that business make differ between sectors and indeed between businesses of different sizes, as economies of scale can apply.

Everybody would be angry about the drug dealer - the point I was trying to make is that the reciprocity argument applied to him is different in kind from that applied to someone for whom «unearned wealth» accumulates independent of the taxpayer.

«Synthetic arguments in many ways would destroy one of the greatest assets of this government — people like seeing people from different parties working together,» he said.

Special relationship After the Bush years, after Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib and Iraq, this post-Suez argument may well resonate tonight, though Mr Clegg may not sound very different from David Cameron on it.

Both parties have strong points for their arguments and they both have the public as their priorities but from different angles.

The necessary communication skills, she feels, are quite different from those that journalists must possess, for, in journalism, her impression is that time constraints and the need to make stories «sexy» often take priority over objectivity and a balanced argument.

Their argument rests on examples in which one chimp learns from another, and on the seemingly arbitrary differences in habits between chimpanzee groups at different sites.

The main arguments that Weightman offers for his conclusions are the unlikelihood of similar seismic activity in the United Kingdom — it is 1000 miles from the edge of a tectonic plate — and the fact that all of its 19 reactors are of a different design from those at Fukushima.