Sentences with phrase «different arguments against»

Staying true to his word, Andresen proceeded to publish a slew of posts addressing several different arguments against raising the limit.

But 24 articles in 18 different journals, collectively making several different arguments against global warming, expose that claim as false.

An opportunity for pupils to explore different arguments against God's existence.

Not exact matches

When this is done, no argument is needed against the real presence of a past figure, for a past figure by definition is not the present subjectivity, is not contemporary, and is precisely one no longer subject to being presented through the senses.7 The presence of a past figure can be made intelligible and justified only by a quite different notion of presence specifically appropriate to the relation of the past to the present.

Pollack's story needs a McGuffin, and for this he purloins an argument that Rosenzweig directed against philosophy for quite different reasons.

Of course, even a genre such as rap has different subcategories, and arguments against popular rap stars such as Lil» Wayne may not apply to every rap song.

Against this latter argument there is one decisive factor: the fact that the «eyewitnesses» would have had to be quite different in interest and concern from any men whose influence we can trace in the synoptic tradition.

Despite their very obvious christian undertones, I though that the last book contained an argument against religion (more - so organized religion, which is a bit different), where the donkey and the monkey pretend to respectively be and be acting for Aslan (the Jesus symbol) and their actions result in widespread chaos, and the eventual collapse of Narnia.

But it is question - begging to use that argument to defend the very existence of such a deity against the appearances (which is very different from Whiteheadians using their principles to illuminate the appearances).

There are also different arguments for and against environmental protection being more important than the economy.

The argument against BP's search campaign has two main two aspects: first, some articles have claimed that people often don't discriminate between organic and paid search results, even though the paid ads are in a different color and marked as «sponsored links.»

Sunder: there are two main arguments for and against different electoral systems, both of which have featured in the traditional debate within Labour.

«It was independently verified by two different labs, working on two different continents,» says Keim, a strong argument against contamination.

Different arguments are given against the resurrection with evidence for the resurrection given from passages from the Bible.

The argument for colorblindness in this context, however, is no different from the argument used against race - based affirmative action.

A lesson where pupils look at different pictures and try to guess how the photographs may explain an argument against God.

I printed these on card and laminated them and I have used them in many different ways; here are some examples: - Sorting activities: encourage children to become more familiar with the instruments and calling them by the correct name by inviting them to sort them according to their own or pre-defined criteria, e.g. tuned / untuned, metal / wooden... - Children select a card at the start of a lesson... this is the instrument they will be using (saves arguments and also prevents against six sets of cymbals crashing all lesson!)

It looks at the Christian belief on the subject and the argument for and against from different churches, the Buddist view on the subject and the impact and consequences of abortion.

This PowerPoint shows the different types of euthanasia, and looks at arguments for and against it.

Pupils make notes on different types of cloning and then decide if the arguments are for and against.

One of NSBA's major arguments against these proposals is that public schools and private schools operate in entirely different worlds --- the former subject to extensive regulation and the latter largely devoid of the same.

Now I understand that I'm coming dangerously close to that fine line that defends shitty controls with an «it adds to the mood» argument, but I truly think Wander's janky movements is vital to that feeling of desperation and helplessness against the beasts, and suddenly having a different engine for the exploration would be completely bizarre.

G&T managed to get their work out there; publishing it in Nature or Science would not have changed the fact that they're arguments just don't hold any water (they didn't do any new science, they just took what was already known, and then tried to use that to argue against what is already known — a search for logical inconsistency, which might have been worthwhile if they'd known what they were doing and if they'd gone after contrarian «theory»)-- unless it were edited, removing all the errors and non-sequitors, after which it would be no different than a physics book such as the kind a climate scientist would use...

So why would you think that just because high solar activity corresponded with different planetary temperatures at different times, that was somehow an argument against solar activity as a driver fo climate?

So why would you think that just because high solar activity corresponded with different planetary temperatures at different times, that was somehow an argument against solar activity as a driver of climate?

'' trying to come up with or re-post every possible argument under the sun to all but argue against the basic concept that radically altering the atmosphere on a multi million year basis is going to affect the net energy balance of earth, which over time is going to translate into a very different climate (and ocean level) than the one we've comfortably come to rely on.

When so many different arguments support and no observations or plausible arguments speak against the understanding, it's natural that essentially every scientist of applicable specialization agrees that the theory of radiative energy transfer is correct including people like Lindzen and Spencer.

While actual scientists are trying to piece together every little part of an otherwise almost un-piecable long term chaotic and variable system in response now to a massive increase in net lower atmospheric energy absorption and re radiation, Curry is busy — much like most of the comments on this site most of the time — trying to come up with or re-post every possible argument under the sun to all but argue against the basic concept that radically altering the atmosphere on a multi million year basis is going to affect the net energy balance of earth, which over time is going to translate into a very different climate (and ocean level) than the one we've comfortably come to rely on.

The Defendant here admitted that the proposed expert was an expert in slip and fall accidents and floor safety, but their argument against the admissibility of his testimony was that his floor safety expertise is inapplicable to the proper design of steps located in the interior of a locomotive, as trains are different than buildings or walkways.

Judge Alito, however, may be a different case, thanks in particular to the legal argument against Roe v. Wade he helped author after he wrote this initial memo.

It is little different than a census count — some may not see much value or interest in it (I may disagree but I'll respect that viewpoint) but it's hard to understand an argument against any third - party (whether it's us or someone else) looking to set up a simple study to report on these figures.