Sentences with phrase «different arguments for»

I have heard many different arguments for NOT using proofreading software over the years.

There are different arguments for vouchers, such as that they would give parents more choice, reduce the role of government in education, enable parents to transmit values and religion to their children, and deliver cost - effective education.

There are also different arguments for and against environmental protection being more important than the economy.

Here are a few different arguments for only adding minor expansions, if any at all.

Not exact matches

«Depending on how the targeting is happening, you can make potentially different sorts of arguments about whether or not Google or Facebook or LinkedIn is contributing to the development» of the ad, said Deirdre K. Mulligan, a faculty director of the Berkeley Center for Law and Technology.

For me, though I learned a lot in college, the skill I continue to use on a daily basis in my consulting business is the ability to look at my own argument or point of view and examine why someone else might have a different perspective.

The more compelling argument isn't that Amazon and Netflix are competing on different fields, but rather that there will be enough room for both of them.

On the day of the third presidential debate between Trump and Clinton, Trump's team tested 175,000 different ad variations for his arguments, in order to find the right versions above all via Facebook.

Despite a lingering argument over whether Bitcoin is more or less important than its underlying tech, Consensus 2016 saw keynote addresses and panel discussions on applications for blockchain or distributed ledger technology in cross-border payments, smart contracts, government, security, identity, the Internet of Things, and all different kinds of clearing and settlement.

That's not an argument for God, but it does tell a very different story about Him from the one told by Fry.

The idea of an «absolute antidote» suggests a different concept of the human than is presumed in Hitchens's argument: a being capable of enslavement by his darker side, one whose infinite desire for something beyond himself can be short - circuited into various «false infinities» (Ratzinger), who can redeem himself only by restoring the circuitry of his absolute relationship with his Generator.

The analysis of these texts will be much shorter than the analysis of the flood in Genesis 6 — 8 because explaining all the texts in detail would simply mean that many of the same arguments and ideas presented as an explanation for one text would simply be repeated in an explanation for a different text.

When this is done, no argument is needed against the real presence of a past figure, for a past figure by definition is not the present subjectivity, is not contemporary, and is precisely one no longer subject to being presented through the senses.7 The presence of a past figure can be made intelligible and justified only by a quite different notion of presence specifically appropriate to the relation of the past to the present.

Two completely different — and logically incompatible — arguments in favor of communion for the divorced and remarried have figured in the synodal process that led up to Amoris Laetitia.

Yup, same arguments, different day, it's shows how brainwashed the christians are, but when fighting for civil rights it always takes time.

The bulk of this scholarly volume treats the distinctive and different ways that the Lutheran, Calvinist, and Anglican traditions adapted what the author identifies as the medieval model; the Catholic tradition, with its insistence that marriage constitutes a true sacrament of the new dispensation, thus serves as something of a foil for the book's extended argument.

If one destroyed the Genesis story of creation and substituted the gradual emergence of different forms as they struggled for survival in their environment, then one destroyed the entire argument for the proof of God from the evidence of creation.

Pollack's story needs a McGuffin, and for this he purloins an argument that Rosenzweig directed against philosophy for quite different reasons.

Likewise, some of the «unconverted,» perhaps particularly among those with strong religious convictions, may yet be moved by more idealistic arguments for a different sense of what human life as such deserves, the horror of a particular individual's behavior notwithstanding.

The failure to realize the significance of describing the attributes of God from two different aspects is responsible for most of the disputes and futile arguments with which Muslim books on theology abound.

You are just looking for a different illogical argument to hide your hate.

In analysing such arguments, one must also note that in writers such as Cyprian, the access to the Hebrew scriptures were not only through the canonical text as such, but also, practically, through anthological collections of texts from these writings, which circulated in various forms, being used for diverse purposes in different communities.

We have no idea that there might be other types of life in other parts of the universe or through a black hole into another universe that have very different narrow constrictions for environment that this argument says is prime for us.

That his concern is legitimate few will deny, and wholly apart from the theoretical issue noted above, this concern constitutes a strong practical argument for a liberal polity (which does no more than promote «some kind of equilibrium, necessarily unstable, between the different aspirations of different groups of human beings»).

Despite their very obvious christian undertones, I though that the last book contained an argument against religion (more - so organized religion, which is a bit different), where the donkey and the monkey pretend to respectively be and be acting for Aslan (the Jesus symbol) and their actions result in widespread chaos, and the eventual collapse of Narnia.

As a Lutheran pastor, I supported women's ordination as part of a more general argument that God did not intend men and women to have different roles, and I found support for this position in Martin Luther's writings.

«8 He even echoed the argument that some of the Southern apologists used for very different purposes; namely that the slave is in some degree better off than the factory worker since he never faces the uncertainties of unemployment or the pangs of actual physical want that afflict the latter.

On such a planet, the argument for design would look completely different, yes?.

As more and more secular intellectuals became aware that they could not offer a philosophical defense of the liberalism that they cherished, an opening was created for substantively different arguments.

The fact of this common use of opsomai, and also the fact that we are able to explain the switch from crucifixion to parousia reference on the basis of our hypothesis, is, of course, the hub of our argument for a relationship between John 19.37 and Rev. 1.7, a common relationship to different stages of a Christian exegetical tradition.

Probability This article will briefly compare three different design arguments for the existence of God, or an intelligent creator; the probability argument, Paley's argument by analogy and Richard Taylor's argument by example.

The one argument for Paulinho was that we brings something different to this team and IMO this was the game in which that could have been used.

Why we didn't get one is a different argument — but the starting point for that argument is not that Wenger lied to the fans.

Here are the different ways Pierre was a freak since he came into the league in 2000, and they're all arguments for Pierre being the best dammit player of his generation.

atid: For the sake of argument I'm happy to concede they are all different class (but for me barring Costa at the moment) to For the sake of argument I'm happy to concede they are all different class (but for me barring Costa at the moment) to for me barring Costa at the moment) to OG.

of course no team wants to lose but I can guarantee you that the reaction by the Chelski fans after today's results are nowhere near what would have occurred if we shit the bed on opening day... the difference is they have tasted EPL success on more than one occasion recently, they have won the Champions League and they have done it with 3 different managers in the last 12 years with a similar, if not smaller, wage bill than us... in comparison, we have been experiencing our own personal Groundhog Day with nothing to show for it but a few silvery trinkets that would barely wet the appetite of a world - class club... so it's time for Wenger to stop gloating over our week one escape act and make some substantial moves before this window closes or I fear that things will take a horrible turn when the inevitable happens... living on a knife's edge is no way to go through a full season of football and regardless of what side of the argument you fall on, you could feel high levels of toxicity in the air and that was friggin week one... I would much rather someone tried their best and failed, than took half - measures and hoped for the best

Here is the argument for each of the five, made by different members of the panel.

Brendan: I've heard several persuasive arguments for why this schedule reshuffling is good for golf and different golf organizations.

I tried to come up with an argument for a handful of different players, but just couldn't make a strong enough case for any of them.

There is an argument that it would be different for Spurs.

(That may might be taken as an argument for combining the two approaches, in terms of appealing to different audiences and trying to bring them together on equality).

«Munich» became a substitute for an argument: a lazy shorthand for drawing parallels between radically different historical episodes, highlighting the commonalities, downplaying the differences, and thereby resting on the implicit and fallacious assumption that the lessons of one period must automatically inform another.

There is of course the argument that Jinnah, the founder of Pakistan, negotiating for «an equitable share of power at the all - India centre» for the subcontinent's Muslims, had not intended to create the «moth - eaten» independent state he ended up with (see Ayesha Jalal, The Sole Spokesman, 1985, 1994; interestingly, something similar may have happened with Bangladesh, where Sheikh Mujib, negotiating to take power at the centre, ended up heading a separate state), but that is a different matter.

His preparation for leadership was as non - existent as that of the more youthful Owen Smith, being on the backbenches since 1983, never needing or choosing to reflect on how to lead a team of different views, and how to project messages, frame arguments to a wider audience.

What is different this time in England is that there does appear to be some clear momentum behind these arguments, unlike in the failed north - east referendum in 2004, for example.

Sunder: there are two main arguments for and against different electoral systems, both of which have featured in the traditional debate within Labour.

Everybody would be angry about the drug dealer - the point I was trying to make is that the reciprocity argument applied to him is different in kind from that applied to someone for whom «unearned wealth» accumulates independent of the taxpayer.

We know we're going to have at least two new members, and for argument's sake, if all seven were different, you'd have a whole new board.»

A party of government can not have a «sticking plaster» coalition that makes different arguments to each group — it must address the issues that can bind this coalition together, notably housing, support for parents and childcare, and extending educational opportunity

Stephen Tall rather effectively challenges the argument of Daniel Finkelstein which is in effect that anybody protesting on Wednesday, rather than Saturday, was asking for trouble (with no distinction between the different protests).