Sentences with phrase «different at the human»

Of course the nature of the choice and the degree of freedom are very different at the human level compared to that of a frog or an electron.

Not exact matches

It turns out that being a dominatrix is like having a robust human laboratory at your fingertips for understanding the nuances of how people relate to each other in different situations.
The term «Millennial» encompasses a broad swath of human beings at different stages of career, maturity and capability.
«I could very much imagine a future where we have centaur teams in «StarCraft,» where you have a human making high - level decisions and various AI agents at different levels executive them,» Togelius says.
In a sense this is about inequality, and the diverging fortunes of different bank employees: At the high end, banking remains a human enterprise of valued professionals interacting face - to - face with clients, including, if the clients want, by using terrible terrible voicemail.
(This increased economic activity sometimes comes at the expense of human and environmental health, but that's a different discussion).
also the antichrist put a specific picture for every human god to be easier for him to persuade the followers that he is the same god they were waiting for as he will appear for every one of thos at the same time in different places with the same picture and with the same mirecles they belive in.
So if humans lived at the same time as dinosaurs, but lived in different places, they would be fossilized in different places as well.
Dec. 18, 2013 — The most complete sequence to date of the Neanderthal genome, using DNA extracted from a woman's toe bone that dates back 50,000 years, reveals a long history of interbreeding among at least four different types of early humans living in Europe and Asia at that time, according to University of California, Berkeley, scientists.
Religious affiliation and gender preference are two wholly different things; they are not comparable within the concepts of human physiology at all.
In a somewhat different vein, Tracy and Lash, while agreeing that the anthropic principle is untenable in science, find a certain kind of anthropocentrism appropriate in theology: (1) human beings are both products of and interpreters of the evolutionary process; (2) human beings are responsible for much of our world's ills: «if we are the «center» of anything, we are the center of «sin,» of the self - assertive disruption and unraveling of the process of things, at least on our small planet» (Tracy and Lash, 280).
everything is made up of atoms (don't believe me do some research) its the different variables of heat and light and things like that that cause different reactions to make different things and these things when they interact can create something completely different and you and slowly the process of mitosis or miosis starts to work and form stuff hell i learnt that in high school and it was a catholic one at that a millions of years ago i bet the universe was completely different and had things in it that our minds cant even imagine that have since changed over time from action and reaction to what we have today and in another million years who knows with all the different gases we pump into the air and the weather getting more intense on both ends of the scale life as we know it will be different the human race will have to evolve to survive and will probibly form into a slightly different species hell maybe well evolve into 2 different species like in the movie time machine
It was a delusion, and the poem is so different from every human poem as not to be a poem at all, but the Miracle.
So the knowledge imparted was at different levels, - technical rationality, critical rationality to evaluate ends, universal human values, and the humanism of the person of Jesus - but with search for the unity of their inter-relationship realized in the renewal of personal and community life as the ultimate goal.
Although all human activity, labour and consumption no less than prayer or friendship, aim ultimately at the one good of serving God, different activities are more suited for different specks or aspects.
... viewing morality not simply as individual perfection but as part of a social context... tile concept of universal human values which are valid through history and across national, cultural lines respecting different political and cultural possibilities, but at the same time acknowledge some common goals.
While the former aims at the restoration of «true man,» «original man,» the goal of the latter was the transcendence of the human condition, the acquisition of some degree of freedom from the needs or laws that determine ordinary human life by assimilation to a radically different state of being [The Heating Journey (Pantheon, 1973) p. 17].
THe message hasn't changed — but the way people look at it the further out we go from the original intent — it opens it up to different takes on it — and with no one here to explain what the original intent is — we have to rely on illogical humans to interpret it.
It can be inferred with some probability that the human mind, at any given moment, is not drastically different in size and shape from the pattern of activity in the nervous system with which at that moment it interacts, and as this activity moves about somewhat it follows that the mind literally moves in brain and nerves, though in ways unimaginably various and intricate.
At most, you can find Genesis 9:1 - 6 as allowing eating of meat and not explicitly stating that it is OK to eat human flesh (as long as you don't consider humans as «moving» creatures), but as far as looking at the law in detail goes; search the Law in detail and you will find many explicitly laid out things that you «shall not eat» listing many different types of animals and circumstances but you will not find humans listed among theAt most, you can find Genesis 9:1 - 6 as allowing eating of meat and not explicitly stating that it is OK to eat human flesh (as long as you don't consider humans as «moving» creatures), but as far as looking at the law in detail goes; search the Law in detail and you will find many explicitly laid out things that you «shall not eat» listing many different types of animals and circumstances but you will not find humans listed among theat the law in detail goes; search the Law in detail and you will find many explicitly laid out things that you «shall not eat» listing many different types of animals and circumstances but you will not find humans listed among them.
God the progeny — the divine nature not Just of Jesus, but when manifested within any human being (and within any being at all to some degree, though in a different way)
There are, in fact, millions of different humans who are the products of randomness and chance, particularly at the reproductive and genetic level.
At first, I could only see her extra chromosome as evidence of imperfection, as a series of limitations that were different and worse than my own human limits.
Historical - criticism always deals with Scripture as a series of fragmented works from different periods and by definition remains at the basic level of human hypothesis.
But, at the same time that Hartshorne attributes such anthropomorphic qualities to God, he insists that in God they are perfections qualitatively different from their incarnations in imperfect ways in human beings.
Before we set out Whitehead's view, it should be noted that if his view really is a different way of looking at real things, then we will need to think about freedom, human action, responsibility, the meaning of life, the self, etc. in a new way.
It was the age of Confucius in China, of the Buddha in India, and of Mahavira, founder of Jainism, the period also when the principal Hindu Upanishads were written, of Lao - tzu and the flourishing of Taoism in China, of the prophet Zoroaster in the Middle East, of the great transformative prophets Ezekiel, Jeremiah and second - Isaiah in Israel, and finally this was the period of the birth of philosophy and science and what we call Western culture in Greece, all these developments at the same time arising independently in different cultures for reasons not yet fully understood — a kind of quickening of human consciousness all over the globe.
In fact, each human gene can be traced back to a single ancestor at some point over the last few million years, but different individuals at different times, and this is entirely to be expected statistically.
It can be inferred with some probability that the human mind, at any given moment, is not drastically different In size and shape from the pattern of activity in the nervous system with which at that moment it interacts, and as this activity moves about somewhat it follows that the mind literally moves in brain and nerves, though in ways unimaginably various and intricate.15
Defense attorney Sally Hoelzel takes a different line: «My contention is that at the time of the alleged acts of my client, the fetus was not a human being and could not be a victim.»
We're talking about the human beings right now, at this very moment, in different parts of this world with no concept of the existence of Christ and christianity.
For example, what of his contention that, given the unbeneficial properties of water, God should have created a thirst - quenching liquid with different properties or not created humans in such a way that water is needed at all?
For example, if the coordinated form of human activity involved is more complex than driving on a particular side of the road, so that in order to achieve the desired goal, different individuals need to be doing different things at different times, then the authority directing them may need some specialized knowledge in order to arrange things properly to achieve the desired end.
`... At the very least, then, this is the seedbed for higher, intentional forms of ethical virtue, though these latter (with their complex forms of human intentionality and freedom of choice) are of a distinctively different sort from the prehuman varieties of cooperation, and can not in my view be reductively subsumed under mathematical prediction.»
I reply at once that where the character, as something distinguished from the intellect, is concerned, the causes of human diversity lie chiefly in our differing susceptibilities of emotional excitement, and in the different impulses and inhibitions which these bring in their train.
January 31, 2012 at 9:19 am Report abuse o Chad @hippypoet «god is an idea, such an improbable idea that many have, to make the idea inarguably, said that the idea is beyond human comprehension and so be doing remove the need but more importantly the ability to prove and so make it an untouchable notion of truth all based on an idea... how is that different then being delusional?
All natural entities are seen as subjects with some degree of self - determination or freedom and with some degree of sentience or feeling, though the meaning of these words is very different at the level of the human as compared to that of a DNA molecule or an electron.
Look at all the scared, hate - filled Christian wan na be's... Jesus was a liberal and loves all... it's only the simple - minded humans who live in fear, hate and ignorance... you Christian sinners wouldn't know what to do with yourselves if you didn't have something, or someone, to hate... you are pathetic... it was your family before you who wanted to see blacks remain slaves an invoked their perverted views of the bible to justify their hate... and now you, their offspring, are here to repeat their stupid mistakes... ignorant losers are those who hate and mock someone different... Live and let live...
If we look at the story of the flood in Genesis 6, we find mention of mixing of different types of beings, angels and humans, and a total perversion of the natural order.
Yes, this messes a bit with our understanding of the inspiration of Scripture, but in the end (at least for me) it amplifies the grace of God for it shows that He was speaking His truth to lots of people at different times, not just to a select few Jews in a few hundred years of human history.
My thesis is that the many visions of perfection are more or less the same or at least analogical, and therefore if each Faith keeps its ethics of law dynamic within the framework of and in tension with its own transcendent vision of perfection, the different religious and secular Faiths can have a fruitful dialogue at depth on the nature of human alienation which makes love impossible and for updating our various approaches to personal and public law with greater realism with insights from each other.
This being would be so different from us, that if you put a human next to, say, a single bacterium, that being would look at both and see essentially the same thing.
A few reasons why are religious people so stupid: — do not understand Sunday is a day off for many people — they feel it's honorable to post on hobby / interest blogs while at work — do not understand time zones and / or that web sites may be accessed 24/7 by international visitors — do not understand that even within a single time zone humans may have different sleep habits
If different religious practices and beliefs aim at and constitute distinct conditions of human fulfillment, then a very high proportion of what each tradition affirms may be true and valid in very much the terms that the tradition claims.
In fact, there are at least 16 different types of collagen found in the human body.
«At Woolworths» supplier awards last night everyone says they just feel a different buzz when they come to Woolworths now — we're a bit more open, a bit more engaged, hopefully we're a bit more human, a bit more authentic.
The human body works differently at different stages of life, so there needs to be some compromise — and it wouldn't hurt if the teenager tried really hard to cut down on the attitude as part of the bargain.
If you can understand human diversity at all, make room in your tiny heart to accept that every situation in different, and not one of us knows another's situation just from a comment on a post well enough to say what they should or shouldn't do.
The reason is that cow's milk has a different caloric balance as well as more minerals than human milk, according to Frank Greer, professor of pediatrics at the University of Wisconsin and a co-author of the academy's new guidelines on calcium, which will be released Monday.
I am hoping to have a progressive home and raise my daughter to be open and aware, but I do not think I will allow someone elses child into my home to possibly infect or abuse my daughter... He could certainly be a great guy, or he could not be... He could be a bad guy who could change my daughter by hurting her in many different ways... Sex is sex, but another human being being raised by some one you do not know could potentially be harmful... Even if I know the other childs mother or father... the other child could be not so good at heart... I will just raise my child to focus on herself and her future and her education and wants, needs, likes, and dislikes before jumping in the bed with some body who could hit her, impregnat her, or give her an STD: S
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z