Sentences with phrase «different federal appeals courts»

Citing disagreements on the law that have emerged in different federal appeals courts, Silver claims that at trial, U.S. District Judge Valerie Caproni applied the wrong standards to money laundering, bribery and extortion charges.
Apple took the matter to a different federal appeals court that reinstated Apple's victory and ruled that Samsung pay $ 120 million in damages.

Not exact matches

Should the decision end in a draw, the ACA could mean different things in different states, depending on federal court of appeals rulings, legal experts say.
Dasuki to Appeal Judgement on Unlawful Detention... Judge Says EFCC is Different from DSS A Federal Capital Territory High Court has dismissed an application brought before it by former National Security Adviser (NSA), Sambo Dasuki.
If the Supreme Court wasn't functional for an extended period then various different and contradictory decisions made by the appeals courts would build up and there would be different «laws of the land» in each federal judicial district.
It is important to note that the decision in a federal court of appeals is not binding on the cases that are outside of its circuit — there are 13 different federal court of appeals circuits.
For example, the federal appeals court in Chicago (7th Circuit) will still make its own determination on the appeals for the Cook County and Chicago ordinances and will not be required to follow the decisions on appeal in Phoenix and New York because they are in a different circuit.
Steins request wa s rej cyed by State courts and her appeal, to federal court failed for 6 different reasons.
Back on July 7, 2017, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected FERC's order revising PJM Interconnection's «Minimum Offer Price Rule» (MOPR), saying FERC exceeded its Section 205 authority under the Federal Power Act by commanding an entirely different approach to the MOPR than what PJM's stakeholders agreed upon...
As can be seen in this appeal, the creation of national classes also raises the issue of relations between equal but different superior courts in a federal system in which civil procedure and the administration of justice are under provincial jurisdiction.
As an example, in 2012, the Federal Court of Appeal was faced with two lower court decisions which had identified a different «inventive concept» for the same cCourt of Appeal was faced with two lower court decisions which had identified a different «inventive concept» for the same ccourt decisions which had identified a different «inventive concept» for the same claim.
Focusing on a diverse range of issues, he has tried jury cases in federal courts around the country, and has appeared in more than 25 different district courts and six courts of appeal.
Immigration Law is quite complex and involves different types of issues, involving litigation in our Federal Courts, Appeals to the Board of Immigration Appeals, and Business Immigration.
This later patent (No. 5,946,647 shown below) has just now been returned to the Samsung litigation based upon an order by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which in an opinion last Friday (April 25, 2014) revived the patent by affirming a claim construction by Judge Richard A. Posner from a different case by Apple against Motorola — Judge Posner's claim construction contrasted with that of Judge Luch Koh in the Samsung litigation.
But this will have limited weight since these are different jurisdictions and the Federal Circuit would view a German appeals court as its peer.
Until the recent Sixth Circuit decision, the most important invocation of Bush v. Gore by a federal appeals court probably came in a 2006 case decided by a different panel of the same court.
The Federal Court of Appeal bridged the apparent gap between the Johnstone and Campbell River tests in a slightly different — but no lesser - manner by starting with the observation that the test was «flexible and contextual» at paragraphs 82 and 83.
The Federal Court of Appeal recently reviewed the issue in a different case and overturned an adjudicator's order of reinstatement.
This willingness to look behind an issued patent may be contrasted with the Federal Court of Appeal's reluctance to do just that, although in different circumstances, in Corlac Inc. v Weatherford Canada 2011 FCA 228 («Corlac»).
The following is an excerpt from a 2006 Decision of our Federal Court of Appeals, involving a different industry:
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z