Using simulation results from five GCMs and the full range of RCPs, we have characterized the range of terrestrial vegetation responses to future conditions across seven
different global vegetation model formulations.
Not exact matches
Different vegetation models driven with similar climate projections also show Amazon dieback (82), but other
global climate models (83) project smaller reductions (or increases) of precipitation and, therefore, do not produce dieback (84).
Net CO2 flux combining effects of
vegetation and fires over land (in blue) and net fluxes of CH4 (in purple) and N2O (in green) associated with
different regions of the globe and presented as percentages to the net
global flux into the atmosphere shown in the preceding figure.
Recent multi model estimates based on
different CMIP3 climate scenarios and
different dynamic
global vegetation models predict a moderate risk of tropical forest reduction in South America and even lower risk for African and Asian tropical forests (see also Section 12.5.5.6)(Gumpenberger et al., 2010; Huntingford et al., 2013).»