Sentences with phrase «different judges of the court»

From the 1970s onwards, the University Program was continued and improved under a series of different judges of the Court, including Judges Cy Perkins, Russell Merredew and Douglas Walker.

Not exact matches

The lack of guidelines for the courts also creates inequality for families in that a decision made by one judge could be completely different from the decision made by another judge, so the outcome becomes a lottery for the child!

The state Court of Appeals in a ruling Thursday found judges will now be required to instruct juries that witness identifications of suspects of a different race is less reliable than when people make IDs from their own race.

The state's top court ruled that judges will now be required — when asked — to instruct juries that witness identifications of suspects from a different race is less reliable than when people make IDs from their own race.

Her decision was upheld by a unanimous Court of Appeals panel comprised of judges appointed by different presidents from different parties with different juridical philosophies.

There is only one candidate for County Court Judge: David Morris of Sayville, who is endorsed by eight different political parties.

The appeals court said that the trial judge would need to instruct jurors on the law in a different manner to conform with a 2016 Supreme Court decision that reversed the public corruption conviction of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDoncourt said that the trial judge would need to instruct jurors on the law in a different manner to conform with a 2016 Supreme Court decision that reversed the public corruption conviction of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonCourt decision that reversed the public corruption conviction of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell.

Along with panelists Associate Professor John Diamond, Professor Fernando Reimers, Lecturer Rick Weissbourd, Assistant Professors Marty West and Meira Levinson, and the Honorable Nancy Gertner, U.S. District Court Judge for the District of Massachusetts, Minow addressed questions about the use of integration in equality, different contexts of inequality, and pressing issues facing equality in schools.

Judges should be appointed by different sorts of sources, such as by scientific societies, by the science court's own officials, and by a partial panel of the judges themsJudges should be appointed by different sorts of sources, such as by scientific societies, by the science court's own officials, and by a partial panel of the judges themsjudges themselves.

Because the hearing was scheduled on an emergency basis, in front of judges located in different locations, the court conducted the hearing through a conference call without any lawyers or judges even appearing in a public courtroom.

But the situation is no different with the courts - judges with a unique judicial voice, like Judge Richard Posner, write their own opinions precisely because they desire a consistent tone across all of their opinions.

Ms. Rich is a member and a volunteer with a number of different community, legal, and charitable organizations, including the Illinois Judicial Ethics Committee, the Illinois Judges Foundation Auxiliary Committee, the Make - A-Wish Foundation of Illinois, the Chicago Inn of Court, the Lawyers Club of Chicago, and the ABA's Center for Professional Responsibility.

When exercising its discretion to enforce an award despite a violation being established, the learned judge stated that the court must ask itself this question: «is the court able to say that it can exclude the possibility that if the violation established had not occurred, the outcome of the award would not be different?»

Prosecutors appealed the trial judge's decision to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal., which reached a much different conclusion.

Moreover, one could imagine different judges concluding (1) that court fees are never permissible or (2) that exemptions are not always necessary or (3) that this particular fees regime was reasonable because it allowed for exemptions for impoverished litigants; indeed, the regime aimed to strike a delicate balance between the interests of individual litigants and the public interest in effective, efficient access to justice (see Rothstein J.'s dissent, paras. 103 - 112).

However, if you and your child's mother or father do not get along or have different views of what is best for your child, then you will probably need to work with a custody lawyer and head to court for the opinion of a judge.

Both the majority and the concurring judges of the SCC agreed that the test for constructive dismissal required clarification, as courts have sometimes conflated different aspects of the test or confused different types of dismissals.

There is a real risk that such a disregard of the separation of powers and the constitutional role and institutional capacity of the different branches of government could undermine the legal aid system and cause a lack of public confidence in judges and the courts.

By agreement amongst the Chief Judge and the judges» associations, the Court suggested a different approach to the government — one that would show a commitment to the concept of the Social Contract but would also respect the Court's judicial independence.

A Unified Family Court replaced, with one judge in one court, a collection of courts that heard a variety of different family law dispCourt replaced, with one judge in one court, a collection of courts that heard a variety of different family law dispcourt, a collection of courts that heard a variety of different family law disputes.

On at least three different occasions during the hour and a half negotiation either I or the opposing attorney asked for language in the agreement based on nothing more than our clear expectation that the family court judges could not be expected to follow case law on what is a change of circumstances or not giving precedential value to a temporary order at the final hearing.

In different factual settings, this court held that a judge has jurisdiction under s. 1 of the Negligence Act to apportion fault against a person who is not a party to the action, and can exercise this jurisdiction in an appropriate case.

This information, gathered from different perspectives, including court staff, lawyers, jurors, victims and defendants, could be used by the judiciary to support the professional development of judges in the future, including in performance appraisals for those judges that have them.

«The matters to which the court must have regard include --(a) the financial value of the claim and the amount in dispute, if different; (b) whether it would be more convenient or fair for hearings (including the trial) to be held in some other court; (c) the availability of a judge specialising in the type of claim in question; (d) whether the facts, legal issues, remedies or procedures involved are simple or complex; (e) the importance of the outcome of the claim to the public in general».

Judge Newman filed a separate dissent, pointing out that all amicus briefs submitted in the case argued against different standards in PTAB and district court proceedings, stressing the concern that different claim constructions would lead to uncertainty a lack of predictability in patent rights.

The Court of Appeal upheld the result, but for different reasons than the trial judge.

26 The Report of the Attorney General's Advisory Committee on Charge Screening, Disclosure and Resolution Discussions (the Martin Committee Report)(1993), at p. 369 (in a passage approved in R. v. Rajaeefard (1996), 27 O.R. (3d) 323 (C.A.) at 330 - 1), observed: Consequently, in the interest of encouraging the parties to fully explore their case at a pre-hearing conference without prejudice to their right to subsequently litigate fully all unresolved issues in open court, it is the Committee's view that the parties should, where either one thinks it appropriate, be able to insist on a trial before a different judge.

As Justice McIsaac quoted, the Committee's rationale for this recommendation insists... in the interests of encouraging the parties to fully explore their case at a pre-hearing conference without prejudice to their right to subsequently litigate fully all unresolved issues in open court, it is the Committee's view that the parties should, where either one thinks it appropriate, be able to insist on a trial before a different judge.

We can welcome the brave new world of child support magistrates» court appeals in the county court (I know of two circuit judges who, to my knowledge, have experience of one child support case each; and on the same point they made different decisions — which is relevant, as will be seen below).

In fairness, it should be noted that the Court's reasoning might have reflected the various emphases on the importance of international human rights law and norms by counsel, the different approaches of different judges, or principled distinctions lurking in the background that have not been systematically revealed in the written reasons.

The Court of Appeal held the legal issue of threshold admissibility (regarding the inconsistent statements made by the accused) was quite different from and not relevant to the judge's ultimate finding that the Crown failed to establish the collusion on which its case depended.

In a very different outcome, the Court of Appeal strongly disagreed with the trial judge, unanimously stating that the invoice had «nothing to do with the contract of carriage and providing a copy of the invoice to the carrier was not declaring the value of the goods on the face of the contract of carriage within the meaning of the regulation».

However, the Arizona Court of Appeals clarified in the case of Hart v. Hart that the court must apply a different standard if the judge issues an order terminating a parents visitation or order that visitation is supervCourt of Appeals clarified in the case of Hart v. Hart that the court must apply a different standard if the judge issues an order terminating a parents visitation or order that visitation is supervcourt must apply a different standard if the judge issues an order terminating a parents visitation or order that visitation is supervised.

However, beside the exceptionality of «additive» judgments and the complexity of the Supreme Courts» rulings concerning the relationships between EU and national criminal law, the very different requests the referring judges (especially the Corte d'Appello di Milano, Order of 18 September 2015) made to the ICC represented a procedural obstacle to the said outcome that was impossible to bypass.

The majority was also influenced by the fact that the statute clearly excludes appointing Federal Court judges to sit as ad hoc members of the Supreme Court when it hears Québec cases — the majority's interpretation therefore reconciles two different but similar provisions, rather than leaving them at odds.

The first - instance judge had also found the disposal decision substantively unreasonable, but the Court of Appeal (rightly in my opinion) took a different view.

Although I have previously argued that the Piresferreira decision was legally wrong and, in fact, contrary to other appellate decisions including Sulz v. Canada, 2006 BCCA 582 and Queen v. Cognos, (the Supreme Court of Canada did not disturb or address the trial judge's award of $ 5,000 in damages for «emotional stress» in its decision in Queen v. Cognos Inc., [1993] 1 SCR 87,) this post will focus on a different issue: whether the decision highlights the differences to which claims of a hostile work environment can be put.

Commenting on the Harborview litigation, Judge Loretta A. Preska, of the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, noted that the case brought on behalf of the plaintiffs was «interesting and different» and that settlement on their behalf «was a job well done.»

This later patent (No. 5,946,647 shown below) has just now been returned to the Samsung litigation based upon an order by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which in an opinion last Friday (April 25, 2014) revived the patent by affirming a claim construction by Judge Richard A. Posner from a different case by Apple against Motorola — Judge Posner's claim construction contrasted with that of Judge Luch Koh in the Samsung litigation.

It appears that this issue has arisen on a number of occasions in a number of different jurisdictions, and it further appears that depending on the circumstances, courts generally have concluded that until the matter is finally concluded, a presiding judge is not functus officio and m [a] y indeed amend or change his original decision to conform to the evidence existing or to new evidence which is brought to his attention.

The Arizona Court of Appeals must consider the possibility that, had the trial judge done so, it may have resulted in a different outcome.The Arizona Court of Appeals also found that the order for supervised parenting time on the part of Mother was based (per court documents) on the best interest of the chilCourt of Appeals must consider the possibility that, had the trial judge done so, it may have resulted in a different outcome.The Arizona Court of Appeals also found that the order for supervised parenting time on the part of Mother was based (per court documents) on the best interest of the chilCourt of Appeals also found that the order for supervised parenting time on the part of Mother was based (per court documents) on the best interest of the chilcourt documents) on the best interest of the children.

According to Justice David Wake, who chaired the Secretariat from 1999 to 2005, it has faced a number of challenges over the years, including: continuing uncertainty about the different roles of the Conference and the Office of the Chief Justice; concern about possible erosion to the core programs; lack of coordination between the different programs; and the ongoing worry of the family law judges that their unique programming needs might be lost as their numbers declined with the expansion of the Unified Family Court.

«Having guidelines to establish a court website will help different jurisdictions standardize their websites,» says Louis - Vincent d'Auteuil, a lieutenant - colonel and military judge with National Defence, Government of Canada.

When multiple civil actions involving one or more common questions of fact are pending in several different federal district courts, those actions can sometimes be transferred to one district court for coordinated and consolidated management and pretrial proceedings under a single judge.

The Court of Appeal remitted the certification motion to a different case management judge for determination on the basis of an amended statement of claim.

Section 520 clearly envisions more than one opportunity to bring a bail review application and contemplates that different judges of the superior court will sometimes hear these applications.

And hear different perspectives about what the career paths open to arbitration lawyers, from acting as secretary to tribunals, working at an institution such as the HKIAC, appearing as counsel, taking on the role of arbitrator and even being appointed as a High Court judge!

And hear different perspectives about what other career paths are open to arbitration lawyers, from acting as secretary to tribunals, working at an institution such as the HKIAC, appearing as counsel, taking on the role of arbitrator and even being appointed as a High Court judge!

Citing Loveridge, the appellant urged the Court of Appeal to find a misapprehension, and then (based on the principle that the appellant is entitled to have his case assessed on a proper apprehension of the evidence), find that the ultimate result might have been different had the judge not erred; that it can not be confidently said the same result inevitably follows with or without the error.

Anecdotally, the author has heard judges from several different court levels talking about incorporating aspects of procedural fairness into sessions at the Washington State Judicial College.