Sentences with phrase «different judgments on»

I don't agree with that, but people seem to have different judgments on these things.

It just means different people will make a different judgment on the same behavior.

But they may make a different judgment on this point, identifying the beginning of authentically personal life with quickening, or with birth.

Both Piers Forster and I seem to have that opinion, but we both have even so the view that IPCC did use the result in a fully acceptable way making a different judgment on other related factors, but using the empirical results as given by the paper.

Not exact matches

What attracted me to the book was an interview I read with Vance in which he described how liberal whites went so far to ensure they never offended any people of color or people with different sexual orientations but were quick to pass judgment on people from flyover states.

Get outside of your normal routine by learning a new hobby, reading a different book genre, or striking up a conversation with a complete stranger (exercise judgment on this one).

Vertical equity: A value judgment about whether the net tax burden on people at different levels of well - being is appropriate.

If you are concerned that I spend time everyday in prayer or encouraging some poor soul as a waste that is a value judgment no different than a believer that looks down on what gays do in their bedrooms.

In Nobo's judgment, the chapter on «Process» (II.10) and the final chapter (V. 2) concern two different topics, resolved by the same set of ideas.

That question is being answered in many different ways in this generation, but the final judgment on sexual action is what it means for the fulfilment of persons now and throughout life.

When we sit in judgment on others, because they believe something different or behave in ways we think are wrong, we mimic Satan rather than God.

On a philosophical level we can use the relationship of the tree and the boy as a way to remind ourselves of the very different judgments produced by utilitarian and deontological ethical systems.

In A Common Faith Dewey suggests that organized religion once provided a useful sense of the whole, but that now it has abandoned that task and, instead, attempts to fob off on newly emergent societies the basically irrelevant sense of the whole generated by an earlier society in a different history If this last judgment is harsh, it was harsh because «the religious» was so important to Dewey and because he still hoped for a religiousness capable of setting forth a functional sense of the whole.

And certainly no one will want to say that male and female brains are «ontologically» different — especially since the genealogy of that line of thought has historically led to decidedly misogynist judgments on the female intellect.

Morality does not rule out feeling — on a human level moral judgment is simply logically in a different category than ordinary feeling.

Completely tribal, focused on punishment, fixated on torment and judgment of anything different from Him.

But to wimp out with the «Will jolly, I don't really know for sure because there are all these different views held by different people for different reasons and based on very different levels of judgment and intelligence, so I don't really know what I personally think about anything.»

Passing judgment on television is one thing, managing a team of players something altogether different.

Spouses may have different ways of handling grief, shame, anger, sadness and frustrations but they shouldn't «pass judgment on each other for having a different emotional style,» says Laura Marshak, co-author of Married with Special - Needs Children.

I would want to take care in jumping to describe someone whose judgment on this is different to mine as less rational.

The 2010 results are based on an expert panel that was called upon to use participants» judgment to assess the relative harm of 20 different drugs.

In some cases, our judgments may align very closely with what we would actually do, but on occasions they may be very, very different.

Not much is known however about the cognitive processes that come into play when people choose allies within different social settings — and whether «minimal information», such as snap judgments made about someone based on how their face looks, is used in our assessments of suitable allies.

«I don't understand how others can sit around casting judgments on people because they have different religions and a certain point of view.»

Not to be confused with IndianDating from above, IndianDating.co.in offers a different online dating experience — one that emphasizes traditional Indian values but that doesn't place judgment on people with different lifestyles and of various backgrounds.

«Global competence is the capacity to analyse global and intercultural issues critically and from multiple perspectives, to understand how differences affect perceptions, judgments, and ideas of self and others, and to engage in open, appropriate and effective interactions with others from different backgrounds on the basis of a shared respect for human dignity.»

For the analysis of content coverage, we had to rely on our judgment of whether a document adequately addressed a certain criterion and, therefore, required a different procedure from the more objective analyses.

One peek at our rankings tell you that this was close - and that your own test drives might very well produce different preferences.We also can say that if off - road capabilities were the prime criteria, the results would be much different.But for most of us, sport - utility vehicles are essentially cars with extra ground clearance, four - wheel drive, extra cargo capacity, an added sense of security and an extra measure of rugged panache.So our judgments are based largely on the same standards we apply to automobiles, with safety features right up at the top of the list.

Instead of being pushed off - course by short - term reactions, fear of being different from the crowd or a particular index, our judgments are based purely on long - term analysis of prospective risk and reward.

But she bucks this value judgment, focusing instead on the psychology at work behind the interplay of interaction and confrontation between wildly different materials that relate to a confusing set of pop cultural references.

But it is far different from Crichton appearing as someone capable of passing judgment on AGW.

The IPCC's consensus building process relies heavily on expert judgment; if the public and the policy makers no longer trust these particular experts, then we can expect a very different dynamic to be in play with regards to the reception of the AR5 relative to the AR4.

Whether Judith has more publications than me is irrelevant - I fully expect her to at the very different stages in our careers, but I also have the technical background to make judgments on much of what she writes about here.

This realisation wasn't immediate, but rather came from many different judges over many years passing judgments which, only later on, proved to have unintended consequences.

The UCS scientists and colleagues took the IPCC to task for issuing reports that present different future scenarios, while making no judgment on the relative likelihood of the varying projections, «implicitly treating all scenarios as equivalently plausible.»

Rather it was that any policy decision on what to do about climate change must be based on the assessment of relative costs and benefits and with ethical judgments which weigh the impacts on various groups at different points in time.

The 2013 VW law judgment and Essent, even though decided on different legal grounds, both seem to move the «golden share» case law into a similar direction: in the former judgment, the Court shuns the Commission's overly expansive, instrumentalist interpretation of the application of Art 63 TFEU in the 2007 judgment, which the Commission would have liked to understand as a carte blanche for challenging all measures deviating from its preferred model of corporate governance.

2015 was no different in this regard as much attention focused on the Court's judgment in Schrems (discussed here), which invalidated the 15 year old Safe Harbor data sharing agreement between the EU and the US, and on the culmination of four years of negotiation on the new Proposed General Data Protection Regulation in December.

The judgment also contains important guidance on the new requirement for permission and relief to be refused if the outcome would not have been substantially different if the conduct complained of had not occurred.

Introducing the publishing outfit that is responsible for different law reports in the country, he said: «Alexander Payne & Co. are publishers of specialized law reports including Supreme Court Judgments on Lands (SCJL), Supreme Courts Judgments on Evidence (SCJE), Intellectual Property Law Reports (IPLR) and Nigerian Company Law Cases (NCLC).»

41 Therefore, on the one hand, provided that the selection or arrangement of the data --- namely, in a case such as the one in the main proceedings, data corresponding to the date, the time and the identity of teams relating to the different fixtures of the league concerned (see paragraph 26 of the present judgment)- — is an original expression of the creativity of the author of the database, it is irrelevant for the purpose of assessing the eligibility of the database for the copyright protection provided for by Directive 96/9 whether or not that selection or arrangement includes «adding important significance» to that data, as mentioned in section (b) of the referring court's first question.

Applying the Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 27, the Court noted that «subject to certain well - known exceptions, the general rule is that when an issue of fact or law is actually litigated and determined by a valid and final judgment, and the determination is essential to the judgment, the determination is conclusive in a subsequent action between the parties, whether on the same or a different claim.»

The 20 December 2005 judgment of Judge John Jones in Kitzmiller v. Dover School District (here in PDF, 139 pages) is worthwhile reading (and was briefly mentioned in an earlier SLAW comment on a different topic).

This puts a different light on a judgment amount and on the lawyer, whose website a potential client is looking at, since they have now become a person, not just all about a dollar figure.

Edit (4 June 2015): I would like to refer to Pieter Jan Kuijper's recent informative blogpost on the blog of ACELG for further reading and a different view on the Court's judgment.

This style of anonymous judgment has generally been focused on constitutional issues down three different tracks: first, reactively to federal but not provincial reference cases; second, defensively on issues impacting directly on the judiciary; and third, proactively on constitutional issues at the Court's internal discretion.

«Without clarity as to how courts should approach future judgments of the CJEU, there is a risk that different case law will emerge on the same legislation as European and UK courts may interpret them in different ways.

He held that in making this judgment, a competent authority is not obliged to disregard any measures incorporated into the proposal which are designed to avoid or mitigate adverse habitat effects, observing that it would be «ludicrous» for a decision maker to have to disaggregate the different elements of the package, or require an appropriate assessment on the basis that the proposals (considered without the mitigating measures) would be likely to have a significant adverse effect, only for the package to have to be reassembled when carrying out the appropriate assessment.

Nevertheless, besides the existence of past rulings of the CJEU regarding the minimum common meaning of mens rea on a continental scale (the most relevant one being the Intertanko judgment, case C - 308 / 06: see paras 72 - 77) which prove the opposite, the message sent by the latter Court in between the lines might be different.

The Court's judgment on this point is remarkably different from AG Sharpston's Opinion.