Not exact matches
The Trial Warrior — A
Judicial Do - Over — Antonin Pribetic gives a thoughtful analysis of the
different roles of trial and appellate courts within the legal system, taking a particular look at s. 96 of the Ontario Courts of Justice Act.
However, David Thomas, doyen of sentencing experts, having expressed his opposition to the whole idea of a Sentencing Commission, said that if one was established, he had «grave doubts about the wisdom of involving serving senior judges in the activities of such a body... as there is a tendency to confuse the
roles of the judges in their
different capacities and a consequent tendency to compromise
judicial independence.»
Incorporation of foreign and international rules and principles will require skills of synthesis and distinguishing that are distinct from traditional domestic legal reasoning, and they may require appreciation of important differences in foreign / international legal, political, or perhaps even cultural context.63 International legal rules often play a complex
role in domestic law, presenting issues of interpretation and enforceability that do not easily fit within traditional domestic United States legislative, administrative, and
judicial legal structures.64 Integration or application of rules from foreign nations may be even more complex, especially where those systems are substantially
different from our own.65 Additionally, there may be discrepancies between the form and function of foreign or international law that affect their proper application.
«A candidate taking a political position in the course of a campaign is
different from the
role of a judge making a ruling in the
judicial process,» said White House spokeswoman Dana Perino.»
In a Q&A session with Miami Today, Shutts & Bowen partner Aliette DelPozo Rodz speaks about the
role of the firm's Cuba Task Force, her appointment as Chair of the Bar Grievance Committee for the 11th
Judicial Circuit and the
different aspects of her litigation practice.
The respective
roles of the
different branches of the legal profession, especially the
judicial and the academic — and their publishing habits or obligations — mean that the participants in and the form of doctrine and doctrine differ.