Not exact matches
But when one contrasts the Canadian reaction to the explicit insertion of religious views into the Republican Party and the recent book attempting to argue that the US Constitution (notwithstanding the separation
doctrine) is a Christian text because of the beliefs of the Founding Fathers — then it becomes clear just how
different the two
legal cultures are.
An organizing principle therefore is not a free - standing rule, but rather a standard that underpins and is manifested in more specific
legal doctrines and may be given
different weight in
different situations.
The respective roles of the
different branches of the
legal profession, especially the judicial and the academic — and their publishing habits or obligations — mean that the participants in and the form of
doctrine and
doctrine differ.
Secondly, dealing with those issues requires an understanding both of complex
legal doctrines which developed in a quite
different context - we learn a surprising amount from Gallavin and Mason about the trial of Sir Walter Raleigh - and of technological matters such as the extent to which digital images may be enhanced or manipulated, legitimately or otherwise (discussed by Mason and Seng in Ch 3).
Social scientists take a very
different approach, studying the behavior of judges rather than
legal doctrine and trying to understand what accounts for judicial outcomes and the shape of
legal institutions.