Not exact matches
But now the
legal battles against the HHS
employer contraceptive mandate are shifting to very
different questions of personhood: Are for - profit corporations «persons» in such a
legal sense that they have religious rights?
The apparent illogic of two people who do exactly the same work for
different employers — or even of one person who does the same work in two
different institutions — receiving
different legal treatment depending on the identity of the
employer is inherent in the nation's labor laws, they agreed.
• Cross-border If an employee's usual workplace is in a province or country
different from the
employer's premises, it could be complex to determine the applicable
legal regime and / or the
employer's
legal obligations respecting cross-border transmission of confidential, proprietary or sensitive personal information.
The situation is
different for the relatively small number of corporate in - house counsel that also provide
legal services to individuals or entities other than their
employer.
Under federal law enacted in 1972,
employers regularly come under
legal constraint to grant such accommodations to workers of many
different religious sects.
Redundancy is no
different, in essence, from other forms of fair or potentially unfair dismissals — the
legal test is based on the
employer acting within a «range of reasonable responses».
Although many of us who are middle aged or older can remember prior economic recessions (for example, the early 1980s, the early 1990s, and right after September 11th), there is a palpable sense among
legal employers and
legal educators that this particular recession feels
different.
There are many
different ways an
employer can fulfill its
legal duties to «Separate and Protect.»