Among
the different measures of anxiety, the strongest correlations are observed for math test anxiety and problem - solving anxiety.
Not exact matches
One recent study published in the Indian Journal
of Psychological Medicine showed that participants who regularly took Ashwagandha scored better on three
different tests, each
measuring stress,
anxiety, and overall wellbeing.
Participants were recruited from two hospital sites in Melbourne (Australia), and were administered the standard QOLIBRI (Quality
of Life after Brain Injury) questionnaire plus two
different measures assessing depression (the recent World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) and the much older Hospital
Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-RRB-, a
measure of demoralization (Demoralization Scale (DS)-RRB- and psychological distress (K10).
During the time
of conducting our study, the reliability
of the HADS as a clinical screening tool was critically questioned noting that although the HADS was used in TIDES,
different measures were recommended from that international study.36 These
measures were the PHQ - 9 for depression and the GAD - 7 for
anxiety.4 36 Both these
measures are recommended in the international guidelines for mental health screening
of patients with CF, 11 which are since being used in CF clinical settings.15 31 Because
of the current shift away from using HADS as a screening tool for depression and
anxiety in CF, and because
of the small sample sizes in each group (online and paper - based), we did not test measurement invariance to determine if the online version
of HADS is equivalent to the paper based version.
The data were analyzed to determine whether families who left the study were
different with respect to major demographic factors (eg, age, race, or gender) and / or baseline clinical variables (eg, Pediatric Risk
of Mortality scores or mothers» trait
anxiety), as well as the BASC
measures before the 12 - month follow - up assessment.
Fear
of specific emotions (depressed mood,
anxiety, anger and positive affect)(as
measured by ACS) was correlated with the use
of different ER strategies.
Contrary to the meta - analyses
of Crits - Christoph5 andAnderson and Lambert, 7 studies
of IPT werenot included (eg, Elkin et al30 and Wilfleyet al31), because the relation
of IPT to STPPis controversial, and empirical results suggest that IPT is very close toCBT.9 Thus, this review includes only studiesfor which there is a general agreement that they represent models
of STPP.As it is questionable to aggregate the results
of very
different outcome measuresthat refer to
different areas
of psychological functioning, we assessed theefficacy
of STPP separately for target symptoms, general psychiatric symptoms (ie, comorbid symptoms), and social functioning.32 Thisprocedure is analogous to the meta - analysis
of Crits - Christoph.5 Asoutcome
measures of target problems, we included patient ratings
of targetproblems and
measures referring to the symptoms that are specific to the patientgroup under study, eg,
measures of anxiety for studies investigating treatmentsof
anxiety disorders.33 For the efficacy ofSTPP in general psychiatric symptoms, broad
measures of psychiatric symptomssuch as the Symptom Checklist - 90 and specific
measures that do not refer specificallyto the disorder under study were included; eg, the Beck Depression Inventoryapplied in patients with personality disorders.34, 35 Forthe assessment
of social functioning, the Social Adjustment Scale and similarmeasures were included.36
The study showed that it was possible to form composite
measures of mental health problems from single item questions regarding
anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms and FSS with acceptable to good internal consistency and factorial invariance across the
different follow - ups.