Sentences with phrase «different objects in»

Take them outside, get them to close their eyes, place different objects in their hands and ask them to describe and name the object using only touch

There are three book covers to select from, each depicting different objects in Craig - Martin's paintings: headphones, a credit card and an electric plug socket.

Playing with unexpected combinations of violence and peace, the natural and manmade, interiors and exteriors, Fouts challenges viewers to rethink the categories we habitually place different objects in.

A bunch of older games had split graphics like stages into tiles (small images that are, like, 16 × 16, though size can vary) and the devs wrote code to make the tiles repeat in different ways to make different objects in order to reduce size.

Making Crawl in Unity involved a lot of going back and forth between different objects in our project.

These items allow you to interact with different objects in the world, such as mithril gloves that allow the character wearing them to pull orange handles.

The study was performed by having humans engage with three different objects in front of their dogs: a book, a plastic jack - o - lantern, and a realistic looking stuffed dog that moved and made sound.

It's essential that during this time puppies are exposed to people of all ages, all different objects in the environment and all kinds of animals — especially dogs, cats or any other animal the dog will ultimately be exposed to.

Kids can measure different objects in the classroom to try to find that mystery object!

, to represent the different objects in the solar system.

If you get lost, there's a GPS system that conveniently shows you the way to the next objective, or shows different objects in the world to interact with.

Their study looked at whether having the potential to act upon objects influences how humans allocate attention to different objects in a scene.

I like to point out different objects in the pictures.

Told simply and illustrated in elegant brush strokes, Mo Smells Red follows the color smelling nose of Mo as he experiences different objects in the world.

Not exact matches

A different feature in development would use augmented reality to place virtual effects and objects on a person, much the way Snapchat works.

Puzzled pilots of different airlines think they saw an unusual object in the skies on Feb. 24.

«Things» were «moving» in this early stage of the universe, and this motion by different «objects» produced angluar motion in different directions, causing the first stars and galaxies to rotate in different directions.

One can agree with David Bohm, that scientific objects are not fundamentally different from what happens in immediate perception (STR 228).

Although the eternal objects descriptive of the different phases may differ only by complexity of integration, to identify the genetic process with its definite eternal objects is to miss the dynamism of the decisions involved in the succession of phases (Ford quotes PR 342).

Eternal objects are, in Whitehead's terminology, what had been called universals, but as he himself is quick to point out (SMW 169), the conception is quite different.

Thus man is the material object alike of anthropology, psychology, physiology and so on, the formal object being different in each case.

too true; you're right, we are holistic people in a holistic world living holistic lives and political theory, religion, ethics, behavior, psychology, these and many others are all so inextricably intertwined with each other that it may be better to think of them as different views of the same object rather than distinct objects that are inter-related (using «object» here, of course, metaphorically)

Because of God's transcendence it would be mythological to refer to God's action in terms appropriate only to objects available, in principle at least, to ordinary sense perception.13 This especially means that one can not speak of God in terms of the categories of time and space; 14 i.e., whatever is predicated of God can not apply only to some particular time and space, but must apply equally to all times and spaces.15 Thus the implication of Ogden's criterion for non-mythological language about God corresponds to his statement of several years ago, that «there is not the slightest evidence that God has acted in Christ in any way different from the way in which he primordially acts in every other event.

That is, as an aesthetic object which finds completeness in performance but which is brought into the liturgical frame in order to be broken by a different, but related «language of actions, a language of sounds».

The logical structure of a Prolog program is the same logic, in a slightly different form, from which Whitehead's mature understanding of eternal objects developed.

The success of pigeons with cases of absolute value may be relevant to Richard Herrnstein's finding that pigeons possess natural concepts of person, wee, and bodies of water, in the sense of recognizing these objects in many different pictures even when the size or angle of the representation is changed or it is mixed with a bewildering variety of other objects (CVPC 550).

The other is either passed over in silence or without distinction looked upon as the stranger, the foreigner, the pagan, the one who is different, the outsider and the threat, the unbeliever, the one to be ministered to, the object for mission.

Now it could be contended that eternal objects are actually involved in both physical feelings and conceptual feelings, although in a different manner.

What I can't infer is if these believers are followers of the same religion as the object of their hate, a different one, or if it refers to all believers in general.

Generality and the recognition of different objects presuppose this form of memory, for both are initially based on an awareness of the likeness of bodily attitude or of a similarity of reactions in diverse situations.

But, in fact, since we can always compute rest mass from observed mass, it still makes sense to compare two objects moving at different velocities, and to that extent quantitas materiae survives.

Though the objects of study for each of the two disciplines are different, nonetheless both should be answerable to the same philosophical scheme, and appropriately enough we find in the very opening chapter to Process and Reality just such an assertion on Whitehead's part — note the justification which Whitehead offers for his cosmology.

It is not possible, according to Catholic teaching, to avoid even the mere possibility of a conflict between sacred theology and science by delimiting beforehand and on principle the domain of reality to which the propositions asserted by each refer, in such a way that even the material object of each set of affirmations would be different from the start and as a consequence no contradiction at all would be possible (Denzinger 2109).

It aims at foreign objects; when the subject realizes itself it changes that which is different from itself; when the free subject returns to itself it enters the sphere of the other in order to find itself.

So we are no different than any other object in the universe?

Confronting the same constellation of objects as before and knowing that he does so, he nevertheless finds them transformed through and through in many of their details... Operations and measurements are paradigm - determined... Scientists with different paradigms engage in different concrete laboratory manipulations.

Such different ways of conceiving it ought of themselves to arouse doubt as to whether it possibly can be one specific thing; and the moment we are willing to treat the term «religious sentiment» as a collective name for the many sentiments which religious objects may arouse in alternation, we see that it probably contains nothing whatever of a psychologically specific nature.

That Judaism has no such theology is due not to any incapacity or lack of development in its thought, but to the fact that Judaism has from the beginning a different conception of God; He does not in any sense belong to the world of objects about which man orients himself through thought.

Relations are object - like in that the same sort of relation can he discerned among different sets of events.

Thus, innumerable feeling - greenly's are negatively prehended and all but one occasion in the sequence through which feeling greenly allegedly flows are objectified under eternal objects different from green.

In a strand of really distinct actual entities, these would necessarily stand in a subject - object relationship to one another, so that the entity that perishes and is objectified is a different entity than that which is coming into beinIn a strand of really distinct actual entities, these would necessarily stand in a subject - object relationship to one another, so that the entity that perishes and is objectified is a different entity than that which is coming into beinin a subject - object relationship to one another, so that the entity that perishes and is objectified is a different entity than that which is coming into being.

Subjects and objects are not two types of entities, but the same entities considered in different ways.

First, it seems that God renders eternal objects effective for actual occasions in a way radically different from that in which temporal occasions make them effective for each other.

It may help Christians in many different situations with different experiences and interests to remain under a common judgment, to be open to each other in a common fellowship, and to recognize that they are objects of a common redemption.

God is seen as envisaging all the eternal objects as well as all actual occasions, but Whitehead does not see this envisagement as fundamentally different in kind from that possible to other occasions.

In its alternative definition, the word designated not «normal - sex,» but rather a different brand of deviant sex, like its homosexual counterpart in its disregard for procreation but made distinct by the typical object of its lustful inclinationIn its alternative definition, the word designated not «normal - sex,» but rather a different brand of deviant sex, like its homosexual counterpart in its disregard for procreation but made distinct by the typical object of its lustful inclinationin its disregard for procreation but made distinct by the typical object of its lustful inclinations.

On the basis of this formulation I suggest that the relation between God and the eternal objects can be restored to the situation we found in Religion in the Making, namely, that it belongs to no totally different mode from that of other actual entities to the eternal objects.

However, two points remain at which God seems to function in presenting eternal objects to actual occasions in a way radically different from that in which they present eternal objects to each other.

I had mentioned earlier that Ford finds no less than twenty - six different passages expressing an intermediate concept of God, that is, passages in which God is presented as the conceptual valuation of eternal objects.

In regard to his doctrine of ingression, Whitehead distinguished three different ways in which an eternal object can function in the concrescence of an actual entity:» (i) it can be an element in the definiteness of some objectified nexus, or of some single actual entity, which is the datum of a feeling; (ii) it can be an element in the definiteness of the subjective form of some feeling; or (iii) it can be an element in the datum of a conceptual, or propositional, feeling» (PR 290 / 445In regard to his doctrine of ingression, Whitehead distinguished three different ways in which an eternal object can function in the concrescence of an actual entity:» (i) it can be an element in the definiteness of some objectified nexus, or of some single actual entity, which is the datum of a feeling; (ii) it can be an element in the definiteness of the subjective form of some feeling; or (iii) it can be an element in the datum of a conceptual, or propositional, feeling» (PR 290 / 445in which an eternal object can function in the concrescence of an actual entity:» (i) it can be an element in the definiteness of some objectified nexus, or of some single actual entity, which is the datum of a feeling; (ii) it can be an element in the definiteness of the subjective form of some feeling; or (iii) it can be an element in the datum of a conceptual, or propositional, feeling» (PR 290 / 445in the concrescence of an actual entity:» (i) it can be an element in the definiteness of some objectified nexus, or of some single actual entity, which is the datum of a feeling; (ii) it can be an element in the definiteness of the subjective form of some feeling; or (iii) it can be an element in the datum of a conceptual, or propositional, feeling» (PR 290 / 445in the definiteness of some objectified nexus, or of some single actual entity, which is the datum of a feeling; (ii) it can be an element in the definiteness of the subjective form of some feeling; or (iii) it can be an element in the datum of a conceptual, or propositional, feeling» (PR 290 / 445in the definiteness of the subjective form of some feeling; or (iii) it can be an element in the datum of a conceptual, or propositional, feeling» (PR 290 / 445in the datum of a conceptual, or propositional, feeling» (PR 290 / 445).