Sentences with phrase «different points when»

Job seekers start out at different points when preparing resumes.

Measuring schools on GCSE attainment does not take into account the fact that children are at different points when they start their secondary education.

Not exact matches

When the researchers looked at data from that particular study, they found that taller boys and girls performed significantly better at age 3 on a test in which they had to point to pictures of different words.

She noted, however, that Project Include is in a different position than Y Combinator when it comes to asserting its relationship with Thiel, adding that YC has made a point of acknowledging problems of discrimination in tech.

Gladwell points out that things changed when lawmakers took a different approach to the problem.

As most companies grow, they hit an inflection point when they require a totally different type of leadership style and need to adjust their hiring criteria.

«When you look at it from a consumer's point of view, look at what they are being hit with from so many different mediums,» Cheplowitz says.

You might point out that when presidents sign treaties, they use a different pen for each signature and they give the pen to one of the people who helped to make that treaty happen.

The Wall Street Journal won't take your calls, but trade publications, local papers, radio stations, and moderately influential bloggers may, especially when you have something different to say and a story that proves your point.

Two are equidistant from the warehouse, so I split my time between both, and with 100 % consistency at both locations, despite being under different management operators (I asked for the sake of this article to ensure it did not bias my arising point) when I order four Munchkins, they put six in the bag, when I order ten Munchkins, when put twelve in the bag, etc..

Those are the key inflection points everyone needs to be cognizant of when going after different rounds of funding.

When you want to redeem the points you have earned, there are a few different ways to choose.

Couple points — I think having different ideas of what content marketing is is fantastic... I love the conversations coming from that... but when someone comes out and says «content marketing is this, this and that» and it's absolutely not true, I think we are doing a disservice to the entire marketing profession.

Case studies, testimonials and reviews offer value at different points in the sales funnel, but it doesn't mean marketers can't get creative when it comes to UGC — no matter what their industry is.

The sample graphs illustrate pre and post M - DAQ scenarios where buying and selling signals (i.e. «buy low» and «sell high» points) are vastly different when analysed in the respective investment currency.

Stocks might be a little different, but a $ 50 stop in Corn, which is one point, is simply too tight a stop, especially when the 10 - day average trading range in Corn recently has been more than 10 points.

A third and subtle point relates to the differences in the level of interest rates actually paid on different loan products (Graph 2) when compared with reference rates (Graph 1).

At different times investors would like correlated returns when markets are rising, uncorrelated returns when they're falling, absolute returns during a correction, downside protection against a crash, the ability to go both long and short in a sideways market, the ability to be tactical and time the market at the inflection points and, of course, you have to consistently beat the market.

I understand why it is recommended to get pre-approval, and why you want to compare lenders with the Loan Estimate form, but in practice, how do you do both when each requires being at a different point in the house buying process?»

Each pain point has a different solution that needs to be communicated and marketing efforts will have a larger impact when a contact feels like their pain is being addressed specifically.

Every business will have different pain points, and when you understand what they want and need, you can cultivate your content to let your clients know about the solutions you provide.

If, according to her, her «down syndrome» baby is god's gift, and is normal in God's point of view, then why do we see her hatred and vitriole, when she talks about the same god - created individuals, who are also normal, but in a bit different way?

So, what is the point of any teaching when there are millions of different interpretations and you just pick and choose what you like?

Sometimes these sources point in different directions — as when a right not recognized in the past becomes widely understood as fundamental — and a court has to make a judgment between the two lines of argument.

The point here is basically that each way of conceiving of evangelicalism produces a different population when each net is used to pull out of both church history and contemporary experience a coherently related and defined subset.

So since everybody cherry - picks verses from the Bible, the only time you will ever get accused of cherry - picking is when they don't like the verses you picked to prove your point, because the verses they cherry - picked prove a different point.

When the preliminary rule for the contraception mandate was released last year, it had a different four - point definition for a religious organization.

Further, Tibbetts points out that the reticular formation is sensitive, in different people, to different stimuli, and can discriminate, «as in the case of the mother awakening when her child is crying, though the husband remains unaffected» (3:27).

Biblicism falls apart, Smith says, because of the «the problem of pervasive interpretive pluralism,» for «even among presumably well - intentioned readers — including many evangelical biblicists — the Bible, after their very best efforts to understand it, says and teaches very different things about most significant topics... It becomes beside the point to assert a text to be solely authoritative or inerrant, for instance, when, lo and behold, it gives rise to a host of many divergent teachings on important matters.»

Fair enough, I mean, you make a valid point that one of the biggest things about the democractic party is trying to legislate so many different things when there are certain aspects of my life that the government should have 0 say over.

We have seen that when the Bible is read against the background of the ancient mythological cultures, it is found to be pointing in a different direction.

Granted, the believers are perfectly happy relying on scientists and science to — I don't know — talk to people around the world instantaneously via this comment board, and then get in their cars, and fly in planes, and use electricity, and watch TV — all of those things based on science, and yet, when someone points out that scientists have mapped the human genome and other primates and can show, irrefutably, where the different primate families branched off — well, no, no no!

I don't know many Christians to begin with, as they always start spouting off about how everyone else is going to hell because they haven't accepted Jesus in His name or some such nonsense, even when I point out that the word «God» is said in different names due to different languages.

When we say that something is unique, we point in the direction of «different from all the others.»

Anyway., maybe my view is different and I am not condemning, but I am pointing out that when you state you have some special gift that makes you «special» and separate from the body of Christ and you pass correction off as that you do not hold the same accountability to correct view of the bible, then you are already in danger.

And Exodus 21: 20 clearly gives notes on what should happen when a slave is beaten to the point of death or near death, not to mention the other rules of who should be set free, what to do with the slaves» children, how many years to keep a slave... It doesn't sound very different at all from our modern view of slavery.

When the two theories yielded different views of the simultaneity of distant events, both parties could retreat to observations on which they concurred, namely the simultaneity of two signals reaching a single point.

Polkinghorne pointed out: how can the human mind know reality when reality is outside of and different from my mind?

They say that religious people are intolerant of other beliefs and that may be so to a point, on the other hand atheists commit the same «sin» when they attack people who freely choose to believe in something different.

I do wonder though when you, seemingly purposely, avoid some very pointed questions which may reveal that your actions would be different than what you have suggested you believe.

But while Paul's testimony is, historically speaking, of first - class value, when it comes to the question of the story of the empty tomb and the physical nature of the resurrection, his words, far from bringing firm confirmation of the «bodily resurrection», are open to a variety of interpretations, and, on the whole, point to quite a different view of resurrection.

This diversity is different from other epochs - for example, the time when a Princeton scholasticism dominated the 19th - century Protestant landscape, or even the recent period when neo-orthodoxy was at the least the common reference point for theological debate.

When we turn to a later section of the book of Enoch, known as the Parables, we find quite a different point of view.

But that is beside the point — the whole argument to be made here is that Christianity and its messengers both try to differentiate themselves from the rest when, in truth, they really are no different.

It is certainly true — as I will soon point out — that many FWTs do utilize a set of criteria different from Griffin's when determining justified theistic belief.

Now the point of this analysis is that when we ask what self is accepted in therapy, the answer must be that all these selves are accepted, but in somewhat different senses.

Clearly, the thinking which produced this kind of theological statement is very different indeed from that which finds expression in the Lord's Prayer (though it is worth noticing that the context of both is, up to a point, similar: «When you pray, say «Father.»»

Claire Lilley, head of child online safety at the NSPCC, said: «Parents are the first point of call for a child when it comes to staying safe in real life and this is no different when it comes to their online life.

Ecumenical theology's task is to discern when the traditions are saying the same thing in different ways, when they are disagreeing on a point that need not be church - dividing, and when the disagreement truly threatens communion.

--- Yes, I do have very different points of view than NP, but he will be the first one to tell you that when he says the things in this blog, he isn't looking for the choir to endorse every one of his views.