Sentences with phrase «different rules of evidence»

So there's different rules of evidence when it comes to producing social media evidence in BC versus in say, Saskatchewan or Ontario or Quebec.

Not exact matches

The UWC, which uses a different, lower standard of evidence than law enforcement to reach a verdict quickly, delivered a ruling within five months.

Every law that alters the legal rules of evidence and receives less or different testimony than the law required at the time of the commission of the offense in order to convict the offender

However, on September 8, 2008, a different team of astronomers (Thierry Forveille, Xavier Bonfils, Xavier Delfosse, Michael Gillon, Stephane Udry, François Bouchy, Christophe Lovis, Michel Mayor, Francesco Pepe, Christian Perrier, Didier Queloz, Nuno Santos, Jean - Loup Bertaux) submitted a paper (based on data from the ESO 3.6 - meter telescope and its HARPS spectrograph) which claims to rule out the mass of a Neptune - sized inner planet but found evidence for a less massive «Super-Earth» companion in an tighter inner orbit (Forveille et al 2008).

However, on September 8, 2008, a different team of astronomers submitted a paper (based on data from the ESO 3.6 - meter telescope and its HARPS spectrograph) which claims to rule out the mass of a Neptune - sized inner planet but found evidence for a less massive «Super-Earth» companion in an tighter inner orbit (Forveille et al 2008).

Now evidence is emerging that this change is influencing levels of interracial marriage and even the We talked to a few different relationship and etiquette experts for their take on the most important rules of online dating etiquette that you need to know.

The standards (and language) of evidence can be quite different, as are the rules of advocacy.

And the addition in 1999 - 2000, of the (still ignored) electronic records provisions» required proof of «systems integrity» in the Evidence Acts, was not simply another chapter added to the same old story, but rather a very different story requiring different rules and practices for discovery and admissibility proceedings.

You have a judge trial that lasts 30 minutes against someone who is not represented — the perception is different than if you're doing a five - day jury trial which is hotly contested, with the regular rules of evidence, the rules of civil procedure.

While the decision of Rix J appears to reflect the consensus within the English legal profession, the attitude of many foreign lawyers and parties is very different — as evidenced by a recent and potentially highly significant ICSID Tribunal ruling.

These Rules will permit the standardization of procedure and evidence in the different divisions of the ALT, with a view towards improving efficiency.

The golden thread uniting these varying and different rules is the principle that the evidence must meet a minimal threshold or reliability as a condition of being heard by a judge or jury.

Although evidentiary rules of all share the purpose of ensuring a fair trial based on solid evidence, they each play a different role in achieving that goal by ensuring that a guilty verdict is only based on accurate and credible evidence presented at a fair trial.

[71] The common law, upon which our current rules of evidence are founded, recognized a variety of rules governing the capacity to testify in different circumstances.

Before long, it was clear that the rules of evidence play substantially different roles in access to justice depending on the sphere of the legal system (i.e. in a criminal court, in an administrative tribunal, in a setting of self - represented individuals, in mediation, etc.).

The language is unclear — a «tactical» burden is strictly speaking different from a «evidentiary» one and it prefaced by the statement «the normal rules of evidence and proof apply» so this clearly is not a reverse onus.

But I think it is nevertheless worth making the point that the rules of evidence are different in civil cases; whereas in criminal trials the rule against hearsay evidence is much more strictly adhered to.