2 Case law supports a special instruction that jurors must not apply
a different standard of proof to lawyer defendants than other defendants.
But deportation is not a criminal proceeding, and has
a different standard of proof.
In fact, a single statute can set out
different standards of proof that might apply depending on the level of adjudication within the administrative body and the legal issue to be decided, such as the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27.
Not exact matches
On the question in the instant action
of whether to grant an injunction or make an ASBO in substantially similar terms, given the criminal
standard of proof applying to ASBOs, the Court
of Appeal considered it «would be bizarre, not to say irrational, if the
standard of proof in answering the two questions were
different».
The matter came up in a slightly
different form in Re B (children)(sexual abuse:
standard of proof)(2008) UKHL 35, [2008] All ER (D) 134 (Jun).
It is defined differently in
different states and jurisdictions, however, most jurisdiction, including California define the civil lawsuit
proof standard as «by a preponderance
of the evidence» for most types
of claims and, the slightly higher
standard of «clear and convincing evidence» for claims for punitive damages (damages meant to punish the defendant rather than just compensate the victim).
In addition to applying
different claim construction
standards, the Court listed a number
of differences between AIA trials and federal court litigation: the lack
of a constitutional standing requirement for petitioners, the PTAB practice
of reaching a final decision even after the petitioner settles out, and a lower burden
of proof.
The
standard of proof to convict an individual for driving under the influence
of drugs is
different for marijuana and other forms
of CDS.
Practitioners have disagreed over both the burdens and the
standards of proof that relate to
different parts
of the Proceeds
of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2002).