Sentences with phrase «different standards of review»

Not exact matches

Lee and Moher suggest that large experimental studies are needed to judge the effectiveness of different web - based peer review templates to enforce reporting standards, and of ways one might train authors, reviewers and editors to use such tools and evaluate research.

This product includes: • 4 links to instructional videos or texts • 2 links to practice quizzes or activities • Definitions of key terms, such as divisor and dividend • Examples of how to divide using different methods • An accompanying Teaching Notes file The Teaching Notes file includes: • A review of key terminology • Links to video tutorials for students struggling with certain parts of the standard, such as misunderstanding the steps to long division • Links to additional practice quizzes or activities

«While alignment to Florida standards was confirmed for the majority of items reviewed via the item review study,» the firm wrote in its report, «many were not confirmed, usually because these items focused on slightly different content within the same anchor standards.

Representative Holloway said the state will come up with new standards by reviewing all of the other different kinds of standards out there, which could very well share many similarities to Common Core.

The first two sources of evidence of leadership effects, reviewed above, suggest effects of very different magnitudes; small but significant in the first case and large by any standard in the second.

While it is clear that the two polls tapped very different constituents, Rick Hess, resident scholar and director of education policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, says that it isn't surprising that a standard - by - standard review of the Common Core would look different than a review of the sum of Common Core's parts.

FREE LIFETIME CAR WASHES AND STATE INSPECTIONS!!!!! Awards: * ALG Residual Value Awards * 2014 KBB.com Best Resale Value Awards Reviews: * Choice of four - cylinder or V6 power; good four - cylinder fuel economy; many different configurations; standard touchscreen; convenient size; strong resale value.

I'm not sure about finding a site that reviews only those sorts of books, doesn't that suggest you are holding them to a different standard than books published through traditional methods?

While reading James O'Shaughnessy's Predicting the Markets of Tomorrow (full review to come later), I came across an interesting section with three different models used to forecast the Standard & Poor's 500 Index.

That said, most of the reviews are left by locals, which have very different standards than those of foriegn tourists.

For this review I had the Xbox One X Project Scorpio Edition but the only difference between this and the standard version is that the look of the console is slightly different in its cosmetics but the performance and everything else is identical, except there is no vertical stand included with the standard edition console.

The Court decided that when a party is self - represented, the judicial standard for document compliance should be different from reviewing a lawyer's submissions, in a finding reminiscent of Pintea v Johns (2017 SCC 23).

Moreover, the standard of review is not so intense that courts must explore whether governments could choose or have chosen different approaches to high political issues such as centralisation, redistribution and liberty.

P. 52 (a)(6) mandates this more deferential standard of review and nothing in the Court's jurisprudence or the rationales adopted by the Federal Circuit in Cybor permitted a different standard.

The SCC also disapproved of different levels of the «reasonableness» standard of review (Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., 2016 SCC 29 at para. 18).

The Court of Appeal likewise ruled the applicable standard of review was correctness, but did so on very different grounds, which was the subject of my post in Where Are We Going on Standard of Review in Astandard of review was correctness, but did so on very different grounds, which was the subject of my post in Where Are We Going on Standard of Review in Albreview was correctness, but did so on very different grounds, which was the subject of my post in Where Are We Going on Standard of Review in AStandard of Review in AlbReview in Alberta?.

Speaking generally, it may be true (as Laws J said in a passage also quoted by Lord Bingham from R v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Ex p First City Trading [1997] 1 CMLR 250, 278 - 279) that «Wednesbury and European review are two different models — one looser, one tighter — of the same juridical concept, which is the imposition of compulsory standards on decision - makers so as to secure the repudiation of arbitrary power».

Categorising these different types of claim is difficult and the obvious overlaps create a significant risk that a claim will be assigned incorrectly, leading to the application of a more or less intrusive standard of review than appropriate.

A different and less deferential standard applies to appellate review of a jury award of punitive damages.

A third prominent arbitrator sought to distinguish domestic arbitrations from foreign - related and international arbitrations, where the standards of review were different.

Now, I've heard your argument that, unlike in TWU 2001, a BCLS decision would be reviewed by the Court on a standard of reasonableness (possible, although I note that the Dore decision involved a disciplinary hearing, which is a very different context from the current fact pattern).