Sentences with phrase «different subgroup analyses»

Not exact matches

We conducted an a priori subgroup analysis comparing risk of bias, results and conclusions of reviews with different industry sponsors (for example, cane and beet sugar industry sponsored reviews vs artificial sweetener industry sponsored reviews).

Planned subgroup analyses involved comparisons between different approaches to delivery for four key characteristics: group or individual or self - administered, length of programme (same or different), index child involvement or adjunctive treatment.

Although the results of the meta - regression showed no evidence of significant heterogeneity between subgroups, summary association estimates were slightly different in subgroup analyses by study design and exposure assessment.

Therefore, for the review's four primary outcomes we carried out subgroup analysis to explore the impact of interventions involving different types of supporter (professional versus lay person, or both); types of support (face - to - face versus telephone support or both); timing of support (antenatal and postnatal versus postnatal alone); whether the support was proactive (scheduled contacts) or reactive (women needed to request support); and whether support interventions had similar effects in settings with different background breastfeeding initiation rates (low, medium or high background rates).

The analysis calculated rates of vaginal birth of a healthy singleton at term in natural and assisted reproduction conception comparing women in the intervention (lifestyle modification) group and those in the control (prompt treatment) group according to six different subgroups: these subgroups were defined by age (over or under 36 years), cycle regularity (ovulatory or anovulatory) and body weight (above or below a BMI of 35 kg / m2).

The benefits of gabapentin were also similar on analysis of different subgroups, including patient considered at high risk of nausea and vomiting.

Additionally, whereas the BioCycle Study had greater racial diversity than comparable studies (3 — 6), our study was limited by different sample sizes among the racial groups, which may have limited our power to detect significant differences in some of our subgroup analyses.

For my nine insurance subgroups (bigger than Mr. Spehar's analysis — I cover them all), almost all of the intercept terms are different than zero with statistical significance.

8 One problem, they note, may be that the overall picture may be merging subgroups that are going in different directions — so it may require more refined analyses to discern differential impacts.

For example, a tobacco - focused review which included any intervention type, classified interventions with a component of resilience content into different subgroups such as social competence or social influence interventions, finding evidence for both broad intervention approaches.6 For the alcohol - focused review, only universal interventions were included with such interventions grouped according to whether they targeted alcohol alone or targeted multiple substance types.5 While meta - analysis was not conducted due to the heterogeneity of studies, the review concluded that some psychosocial and developmental prevention programmes were effective.

Subgroup analyses showed that the prevalence of depression and depressive symptoms in different specialties varied from 17.0 % to 53.0 %.

The additional analysis indicated that different subgroups were present for boys and girls.

The nature of significant interaction effects was determined by examining the main effects of sample status separately for the different levels of the moderator in GLM analyses of covariance, to statistically test the sample differences within the subgroups.

Planned subgroup analyses involved comparisons between different approaches to delivery for four key characteristics: group or individual or self - administered, length of programme (same or different), index child involvement or adjunctive treatment.

To identify different subgroups of adolescents with psychopathic traits, Latent Class Analyses (LCA; Muthén and Muthén 1998 — 2006) were performed using standardized scores (z - scores).