«I think it's inevitable - and most people in Parliament think it's not defensible in the future to have
a different system of accountability for academy chains and local authorities,» he said.
Not exact matches
My argument here is that a «diverse provider» environment (where an area has an array
of operators running an array
of schools) allows for a very
different kind
of accountability system.
The pattern
of test scores in Texas and the nation suggest that consequential
accountability — adopted early by Texas, then by more states, and finally by the nation as a whole — was a shock to the U.S. school
system that altered the ecosystem and led to a
different outcome than had existed before.
The dimensions
of accountability I've described represent the building blocks
of systems that could look quite a bit
different from what we have now and where we seem to be heading.
This is very
different from the MCT - based
accountability systems of the 1970s, under which students were held accountable, for example, for passing a high school exit exam if they were to receive a regular high school diploma.
Finally, Hill discusses the pros and cons
of six
different ways
of crafting a
system that strikes the right balance between innovation and
accountability.
States could also create entirely separate
accountability systems for alternative schools, weighting existing measures differently (e.g. placing less emphasis on proficiency and placing more emphasis on academic growth) and using
different indicators, such as high school completion rates instead
of cohort graduation rates.
Also in this issue: an analysis
of open educational resources and what the federal role should be in facilitating their adoption; an assessment
of Mayor Bill de Blasio's first few years in office in New York City; and an expert debate on the merits
of two
different approaches to designing state
accountability systems.
As Bush strategist Karl Rove explained in his book Courage and Consequence: «When Bush said education was the civil rights struggle
of our time or that the absence
of an
accountability system in our schools meant black, brown, poor, and rural children were getting left behind, it gave listeners important information about his respect and concern for every family and deepened the impression that he was a
different kind
of Republican whom suburban voters... could be proud to support.»
Following over a decade
of strong federal
accountability structures, states are now embarking on the creation
of new state - designed
accountability systems, possibly featuring very
different strategies from recent years and from each other.
«How Should States Design Their
Accountability Systems,» a forum in the Winter 2017 issue
of Education Next, looks at the pros and cons
of different ways
of rating schools.
The Donnell - Kay Foundation is undertaking a large - scale effort to create a new
system of public education delivery that would use
different accountability metrics.
In reaction to criticism
of the policy, Cate Swinburn, head
of data and
accountability in the D.C. school
system, stated, «In no way does DCPS hold our students to
different expectations based on their skin color or language ability or special learning needs».
Tom Vander Ark recently wrote about several
different approaches to
accountability, including John Bailey's idea
of state - created «innovation zones» that would free groups
of schools from existing
accountability systems.
In detailing the outcomes
of the Hope Study, Assessing What Really Matters in Schools gives hope to innovative and progressive schools and to new and
different accountability systems, while changing the conversation from an achievement discourse to a human development discourse.
In detailing the outcome
of the Hope Study, Assessing What Really Matters in Schools gives hope to innovative and progressive schools, to new and
different accountability systems, while changing the conversation from an achievement discourse to a human development discourse.
But this district
of 30,000 students has pioneered a local
accountability system with a
different, much broader conception
of success.
The NYS Charter Schools Act
of 1998 was created for the following purposes: • Improve student learning and achievement; • Increase learning opportunities for all students, with special emphasis on expanded learning experiences for students who are at - risk
of academic failure; • Encourage the use
of different and innovative teaching methods; • Create new professional opportunities for teachers, school administrators and other school personnel; • Provide parents and students with expanded choices in the types
of educational opportunities that are available within the public school
system; and • Provide schools with a method to change from rule - based to performance - based
accountability systems by holding the schools established under this article accountable for meeting measurable student achievement results.
While NPR's Westervelt criticizes Kane for making a «pretty scathing and strong indictment»
of America's education
system, what Kane does not understand writ large is that the very solutions for which Kane advocates — using VAM - based measurements to fire and hire bad and good teachers, respectively — are really no
different than the «stronger
accountability» measures upon which we have relied for the last 40 years (since the minimum competency testing era) within this alleged «echo chamber.»
The fact that the gambit has resulted in 35
different accountability systems — the very thing Duncan deceptively accused No Child
of doing — has led to an even bigger mess that can not be fixed easily; the evisceration
of No Child has also made it easier for traditionalists and Kline to push to ditch the law altogether because the administration has all but done so for them.
CORE, she says, has added SEL indicators as part
of its
accountability system «with a good buy - in from educators across
different roles and communities» after comprehensive conversations with stakeholders about what constitutes SEL skills and competencies — and why they matter.
Across the country, states are adopting a number
of different strategies to improve outcomes for students: third grade reading requirements, literacy initiatives, new assessment and
accountability systems, plus an increased focus on data - driven decision - making are changing how districts approach teaching and learning for all students.
The Dept.
of Education is also «sending West Virginia back to the drawing board» on the state's ESSA plan regarding «how much weight West Virginia gives to
different areas
of its academic
accountability system, whether West Virginia is holding its counties accountable for English - language proficiency and the viability
of locally - selected tests in lower grades.»
«ESSA shifts much
of the responsibility for student outcomes to states, which must develop robust
accountability systems that target large graduation rate gaps that continue to exist between
different groups
of students, as well as high schools that fail to graduate one - third or more
of their students,» said Gov. Bob Wise, president
of the Alliance for Excellent Education.
A coalition
of 10 California districts that together serve more than 1 million students also submitted an NCLB waiver proposal, which raises questions about both the wisdom
of a department decision to grant flexibility at the district level and the state's ability to manage two
different school
accountability systems.
Meanwhile, with three statesopenly defying NCLB's strictures and at least ten states preparing waiver requests, it looks like «states may have a mishmash
of different accountability systems,» says Jennings, who expects «the vast majority
of states» to apply for waivers by the time Duncan releases his regulations.
These
different forms
of punishment inflicted upon the public school
system by high stakes testing have been called
accountability.
Accountability systems (testing, reporting, and consequences) gave districts political muscle to close chronically failing schools or open
different kinds
of schools.
For example, in the 1990s, as the standards movement was gaining momentum but before NCLB prescribed what sorts
of measures states must report, states began experimenting with
different indicator
systems for school
accountability.
Such a
system allows many school personnel, not just in - house statisticians and programmers, to generate reports and analyses that supply information, provide
accountability, explore relationships among
different kinds
of data, and inform decision making.
According to West Virginia MetroNews» Brad McElhinny, West Virginia's final ESSA plan — recently approved by the U.S. Education Department — included several changes based on feedback from the federal agency, including how much weight the state «gives to
different areas
of its academic
accountability system,» whether or not the state properly holds counties accountable for English - language proficiency, and the «viability
of locally - selected tests in lower grades.»
· The Envelope
System: Handing over a stack
of bills has a much
different feel
of accountability than does simply swiping a debit or credit card — not to mention a visual for those wanting to learn self - regulation.
emphasises the
accountability of governments for socio - economic outcomes among
different sectors
of civil society by treating these outcomes as a matter
of legal obligation, to be assessed against the norms established through the human rights
system;
The full report provides details about the kinds
of measures that can be used to support a focus on SEL — for use in a state
accountability system, which reveals how
different groups
of students may be experiencing school and how they are being supported; and for use at the school or district level, to help educators improve classroom and school practices.