A study published in the Winter 2015 issue of Education Next, «Getting Classroom Observations Right: Lessons on How from Four Pioneering Districts,» looked at the strengths and weaknesses of
different teacher evaluation systems.
The first study looks at the strengths and weaknesses of
different teacher evaluation systems.
Not exact matches
Nonetheless, insofar as
teacher -
evaluation programs are judged by their ability to meaningfully differentiate between the performance of
different teachers, New Mexico's
system is a success.
After extensive research on
teacher evaluation procedures, the Measures of Effective Teaching Project mentions three
different measures to provide
teachers with feedback for growth: (1) classroom observations by peer - colleagues using validated scales such as the Framework for Teaching or the Classroom Assessment Scoring
System, further described in Gathering Feedback for Teaching (PDF) and Learning About Teaching (PDF), (2) student
evaluations using the Tripod survey developed by Ron Ferguson from Harvard, which measures students» perceptions of
teachers» ability to care, control, clarify, challenge, captivate, confer, and consolidate, and (3) growth in student learning based on standardized test scores over multiple years.
This year the list is topped by four major research pieces: an analysis of how U.S. students from highly educated families perform compare with similarly advantaged students from other countries; a study investigating what students gain when they are taken on field trips to see high - quality theater performances; a study of
teacher evaluation systems in four urban school districts that identifies strengths and weaknesses of
different evaluation systems; and the results of Education Next's annual survey of public opinion on education.
The authors point out that the Cincinnati
system of
evaluation is
different from the standard practice in place in most American school districts, where perfunctory
evaluations assign the vast majority of
teachers «satisfactory» ratings, leading many to «characterize classroom observation as a hopelessly flawed approach to assessing
teacher effectiveness.»
The challenge in all of this, however, is to be clear about the purpose of
teacher evaluation so as to guide appropriate selection of tools and processes, and to also understand that contextual needs in one
system may be very
different for another
system.
Making sense of the
teacher effectiveness data is tough work given that
different districts use
different evaluation systems.
Michelle Rhee who, as many of you know, is the founder and current CEO of StudentsFirst, as well as former Chancellor of Washington D.C.'s public schools who during her tenure there, enacted a strict, controversial
teacher evaluation system (i.e., IMPACT) that has been at the source of
different posts here and here, most recently following the «gross» errors in 44 D.C. public school
teachers»
evaluation scores.
He sent this to me for my thoughts, and I decided to summarize my thoughts here, with thanks and all due respect to the author, as clearly we are on
different sides of the spectrum in terms of the literal «value» America's new
teacher evaluation systems might in fact «add» to the reformation of America's public schools.
Efforts to legislate statewide
teacher -
evaluation systems, of the kind championed by the Obama administration in Race to the Top and as a condition for No Child Left Behind waivers, may be a whole
different kettle of fish
Donaldson added that the situation has led to «classroom
teachers in the pilot schools coming to very
different understandings of what is expected of them» under the new state
evaluation guidelines — a
system scheduled to be mandated for all educators next year.
The Center on Enhancing Early Learning Outcomes (CEELO) wanted to know how states are incorporating early childhood
teachers in their
teacher evaluation systems, and additionally, whether requirements for evaluating early childhood
teachers are
different from
teachers of higher grades.
However, the early results in states where new
evaluation systems have been in place for more than a year are not much
different from the old results, as nearly all
teachers have scored in the top tiers.