It» s
no different than gravity, the phenomenon is observable but the theories need to be questioned.
Not exact matches
@Ed What was objectionable in your earlier statement is that you were implying that while
gravity is a known fact that is still less
than 100 % understood (hence the term «theory of
gravity»), evolution is somehow controversial within biology and is called a theory for some very
different reason.
Although contraception is on a
different level of moral
gravity than abortion, its widespread acceptance in the western Catholic world has no less devastating effects.
A belief is something you have come to based on an active search where you you gather evidence and then make a hypothesis changing your view from one of neutral to positive «I believe in
gravity after having studied the research that has been done and my personal experience with things falling on my head» which is
different than «I disbelieve Leprechauns because there is no evidence one way or the other as to their existence.»
But despite the increasing precision of some 300 modern - day experiments using Cavendish's set - up,
different labs have found slightly
different values for G, and in recent years the discrepancy has widened rather
than narrowed (see «G - whizzes disagree over
gravity»).
Those
gravity waves came from two black holes more massive
than any known outside a galactic core and formed in an environment
different than the Milky Way.
But really understanding that opens up whole new worlds of ideas and synthesis because it explains, for instance, why
gravity, one of the basic forces of nature, appears to be very, very
different and very, very much weaker
than the other forces.
Operating like a lens that focuses light along
different paths, the
gravity of the galaxy may make the object appear stretched or as though the light is coming from multiple objects, rather
than a single object.
Another study, which he published with Ezquiaga and others in April 2017, explored the theoretical conditions under which
gravity waves could travel at a
different velocity
than light.
Offering more
than 60
different exercises, the TG 1100 works by making you lift a percentage of your body weight against
gravity, making the resistance smooth and fluid.
Although it's the third film in as many years about astronauts in distress, «The Martian» is a smart, captivating and humorous adaptation of Andy Weir's bestselling novel that covers very
different narrative and emotional territory
than «
Gravity» and «Interstellar.»
EMA observed that heavy vehicles are
different from light vehicles because they have higher centers of
gravity and are more likely to roll over
than to lose directional control.
They also measure a slightly
different vaeiable: sea surface height (aka geocentric sea level, ie the height of the sea surface relwtive to the planet's center of
gravity, rather
than sea level proper, aka relative sea level, ie height of the sea surface relative to the solid Earth).
The US is responsible for 10 % of that, meaning the evil empire you wish to strangle is responsible for.000002 of the atmosphere being occupied by a gas that has a heavier specific
gravity than air, heat and COOL S FASTER
than air, has
different radiative properties, is 1 / 400th of the greenhouse gasses.
ZP says: January 27, 2012 at 6:19 am As one of the few people who have personally built, tested, modified, measured, played around with and experimented with the Ranque - Hilsch vortex tube, I can say from personal experience that they don't shed any light on the various «gravito - thermal» hypotheses, because the vortex tubes operate on very
different principles
than those claimed for the
gravity theories.
Meant to ask too, but just stop at «because the vortex tubes operate on very
different principles
than those claimed for the
gravity theories»
As one of the few people who have personally built, tested, modified, measured, played around with and experimented with the Ranque - Hilsch vortex tube, I can say from personal experience that they don't shed any light on the various «gravito - thermal» hypotheses, because the vortex tubes operate on very
different principles
than those claimed for the
gravity theories.
«In 1915 Einstein's theory of relativity, an entirely
different approach to understanding
gravity than classical mechanics, solved the problem.
If being.1 %
different than observation is grounds for being declared «physically meaningless»,
than the law of
gravity is in trouble, because recent empirical data was 2 % off.
Because real gases not only expand and condense when under
different pressures, but expand and condense when heated and cooled, so becoming lighter or heavier
than «standard air under
gravity», they will rise when heated and will sink when cooled.
The level of skill required to ride a motorcycle at high speeds is
different than the skill required to drive a car fast; forces of
gravity and inertia affect a biker's body far more
than a driver's.